Metrics

TempleOwls

Season
Current

Big East

Big East, 2004

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2004Temple290 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#74 (of 119 teams · 351.4 yds/g · 3,865 yards)#91 (of 119 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 238 points)#84 (of 119 teams · 396.1 yds/g allowed · 4,357 yards)#109 (of 119 teams · 36.3 pts/g allowed · 399 points)#110 (of 119 teams · -14.6 /g · -161 on the season)#74 (of 119 teams · -2 on the season · 17 taken, 19 given · -0.18 /g)#104 (of 119 teams · 16:46 /g · 3h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 119 teams · -0.043 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#101 (of 119 teams · 0.068 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#44 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#98 (of 119 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#28 (of 119 teams · 1.052 average PPA on successful plays)#42 (of 119 teams · 0.952 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 7 Big East teams in 20040 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#45 (Total offense: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range #18–#101. 0 of 7 in the top 10.)#62 (Scoring offense: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range #27–#91. 0 of 7 in the top 10.)#71 (Total defense: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range #30–#108. 0 of 7 in the top 10.)#45 (Scoring defense: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range #12–#109. 0 of 7 in the top 10.)#45 (Point margin: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range #23–#110. 0 of 7 in the top 10.)#63 (Turnover margin: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range #6–#103. 1 of 7 in the top 10.)#41 (Possession: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range #16–#107. 0 of 7 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#43 (Offensive EPA: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range #29–#83. 0 of 7 in the top 10.)#34 (Defensive EPA: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range #15–#101. 0 of 7 in the top 10.)#46 (Offensive success rate: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range #14–#86. 0 of 7 in the top 10.)#46 (Defensive success rate: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range #7–#98. 1 of 7 in the top 10.)#37 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range #16–#89. 0 of 7 in the top 10.)#63 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range #14–#115. 0 of 7 in the top 10.)
2004Boston College930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#45 (of 119 teams · 385.4 yds/g · 4,625 yards)#62 (of 119 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 296 points)#34 (of 119 teams · 332.8 yds/g allowed · 3,994 yards)#12 (of 119 teams · 16.9 pts/g allowed · 203 points)#28 (of 119 teams · +7.8 /g · +93 on the season)#63 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 22 taken, 23 given · -0.08 /g)#40 (of 119 teams · 18:30 /g · 3h 42m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 119 teams · -0.022 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#34 (of 119 teams · -0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#54 (of 119 teams · 35% of plays successful)#50 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 119 teams · 1.036 average PPA on successful plays)#56 (of 119 teams · 0.981 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Pittsburgh840 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#70 (of 119 teams · 357.8 yds/g · 4,294 yards)#48 (of 119 teams · 27.1 pts/g · 325 points)#82 (of 119 teams · 395.4 yds/g allowed · 4,745 yards)#45 (of 119 teams · 24.0 pts/g allowed · 288 points)#45 (of 119 teams · +3.1 /g · +37 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +15 on the season · 28 taken, 13 given · +1.25 /g)#27 (of 119 teams · 18:50 /g · 3h 46m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 119 teams · -0.039 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 119 teams · -0.081 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#66 (of 119 teams · 34% of plays successful)#46 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#16 (of 119 teams · 1.092 average PPA on successful plays)#91 (of 119 teams · 1.042 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Rutgers470 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#39 (of 119 teams · 394.0 yds/g · 4,334 yards)#67 (of 119 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 269 points)#108 (of 119 teams · 428.7 yds/g allowed · 4,716 yards)#89 (of 119 teams · 31.2 pts/g allowed · 343 points)#88 (of 119 teams · -6.7 /g · -74 on the season)#103 (of 119 teams · -9 on the season · 30 taken, 39 given · -0.82 /g)#41 (of 119 teams · 18:30 /g · 3h 23m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 119 teams · -0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#64 (of 119 teams · -0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#46 (of 119 teams · 36% of plays successful)#45 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#40 (of 119 teams · 1.032 average PPA on successful plays)#111 (of 119 teams · 1.136 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Syracuse660 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#101 (of 119 teams · 309.1 yds/g · 3,709 yards)#75 (of 119 teams · 23.9 pts/g · 287 points)#71 (of 119 teams · 388.0 yds/g allowed · 4,656 yards)#77 (of 119 teams · 28.7 pts/g allowed · 344 points)#81 (of 119 teams · -4.8 /g · -57 on the season)#26 (of 119 teams · +7 on the season · 30 taken, 23 given · +0.58 /g)#107 (of 119 teams · 16:32 /g · 3h 18m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#83 (of 119 teams · -0.127 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#66 (of 119 teams · -0.032 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#86 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#82 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#59 (of 119 teams · 0.996 average PPA on successful plays)#14 (of 119 teams · 0.886 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004UConn840 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#18 (of 119 teams · 429.8 yds/g · 5,157 yards)#27 (of 119 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 363 points)#30 (of 119 teams · 327.4 yds/g allowed · 3,929 yards)#37 (of 119 teams · 21.7 pts/g allowed · 260 points)#25 (of 119 teams · +8.6 /g · +103 on the season)#87 (of 119 teams · -5 on the season · 20 taken, 25 given · -0.42 /g)#16 (of 119 teams · 19:13 /g · 3h 51m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 119 teams · -0.008 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#31 (of 119 teams · -0.085 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#14 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 30% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#89 (of 119 teams · 0.943 average PPA on successful plays)#115 (of 119 teams · 1.236 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004West Virginia840 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 7 Big East teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#25 (of 119 teams · 418.9 yds/g · 5,027 yards)#29 (of 119 teams · 30.1 pts/g · 361 points)#41 (of 119 teams · 339.3 yds/g allowed · 4,072 yards)#29 (of 119 teams · 20.5 pts/g allowed · 246 points)#23 (of 119 teams · +9.6 /g · +115 on the season)#45 (of 119 teams · +3 on the season · 25 taken, 22 given · +0.25 /g)#65 (of 119 teams · 18:01 /g · 3h 36m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 119 teams · -0.022 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#15 (of 119 teams · -0.123 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#40 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#23 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#37 (of 119 teams · 1.034 average PPA on successful plays)#63 (of 119 teams · 0.991 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big East, 20042004 TempleBig East medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #45
Total offense. Big East, 2004, best rank first: 2004 UConn #18 of 119; 2004 West Virginia #25 of 119; 2004 Rutgers #39 of 119; 2004 Boston College #45 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #70 of 119; 2004 Syracuse #101 of 119. Marked: 2004 Temple, ranked 74 of 119. Big East median rank 45.
Scoring offensemedian #62
Scoring offense. Big East, 2004, best rank first: 2004 UConn #27 of 119; 2004 West Virginia #29 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #48 of 119; 2004 Boston College #62 of 119; 2004 Rutgers #67 of 119; 2004 Syracuse #75 of 119. Marked: 2004 Temple, ranked 91 of 119. Big East median rank 62.
Total defensemedian #71
Total defense. Big East, 2004, best rank first: 2004 UConn #30 of 119; 2004 Boston College #34 of 119; 2004 West Virginia #41 of 119; 2004 Syracuse #71 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #82 of 119; 2004 Rutgers #108 of 119. Marked: 2004 Temple, ranked 84 of 119. Big East median rank 71.
Scoring defensemedian #45
Scoring defense. Big East, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Boston College #12 of 119; 2004 West Virginia #29 of 119; 2004 UConn #37 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #45 of 119; 2004 Syracuse #77 of 119; 2004 Rutgers #89 of 119. Marked: 2004 Temple, ranked 109 of 119. Big East median rank 45.
Point marginmedian #45
Point margin. Big East, 2004, best rank first: 2004 West Virginia #23 of 119; 2004 UConn #25 of 119; 2004 Boston College #28 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #45 of 119; 2004 Syracuse #81 of 119; 2004 Rutgers #88 of 119. Marked: 2004 Temple, ranked 110 of 119. Big East median rank 45.
Turnover marginmedian #63
Turnover margin. Big East, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Pittsburgh #6 of 119; 2004 Syracuse #26 of 119; 2004 West Virginia #45 of 119; 2004 Boston College #63 of 119; 2004 UConn #87 of 119; 2004 Rutgers #103 of 119. Marked: 2004 Temple, ranked 74 of 119. Big East median rank 63.
Possessionmedian #41
Possession. Big East, 2004, best rank first: 2004 UConn #16 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #27 of 119; 2004 Boston College #40 of 119; 2004 Rutgers #41 of 119; 2004 West Virginia #65 of 119; 2004 Syracuse #107 of 119. Marked: 2004 Temple, ranked 104 of 119. Big East median rank 41.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big East, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big East, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big East, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big East, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #43
Offensive EPA. Big East, 2004, best rank first: 2004 UConn #29 of 119; 2004 West Virginia #36 of 119; 2004 Boston College #37 of 119; 2004 Rutgers #43 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #46 of 119; 2004 Syracuse #83 of 119. Marked: 2004 Temple, ranked 47 of 119. Big East median rank 43.
Defensive EPAmedian #34
Defensive EPA. Big East, 2004, best rank first: 2004 West Virginia #15 of 119; 2004 UConn #31 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #33 of 119; 2004 Boston College #34 of 119; 2004 Rutgers #64 of 119; 2004 Syracuse #66 of 119. Marked: 2004 Temple, ranked 101 of 119. Big East median rank 34.
Offensive success ratemedian #46
Offensive success rate. Big East, 2004, best rank first: 2004 UConn #14 of 119; 2004 West Virginia #40 of 119; 2004 Rutgers #46 of 119; 2004 Boston College #54 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #66 of 119; 2004 Syracuse #86 of 119. Marked: 2004 Temple, ranked 44 of 119. Big East median rank 46.
Defensive success ratemedian #46
Defensive success rate. Big East, 2004, best rank first: 2004 UConn #7 of 119; 2004 West Virginia #23 of 119; 2004 Rutgers #45 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #46 of 119; 2004 Boston College #50 of 119; 2004 Syracuse #82 of 119. Marked: 2004 Temple, ranked 98 of 119. Big East median rank 46.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #37
Offensive explosiveness. Big East, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Pittsburgh #16 of 119; 2004 Boston College #34 of 119; 2004 West Virginia #37 of 119; 2004 Rutgers #40 of 119; 2004 Syracuse #59 of 119; 2004 UConn #89 of 119. Marked: 2004 Temple, ranked 28 of 119. Big East median rank 37.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #63
Defensive explosiveness. Big East, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Syracuse #14 of 119; 2004 Boston College #56 of 119; 2004 West Virginia #63 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #91 of 119; 2004 Rutgers #111 of 119; 2004 UConn #115 of 119. Marked: 2004 Temple, ranked 42 of 119. Big East median rank 63.