Metrics

TempleOwls

Season
Current

FBS Independents

FBS Independents, 2005

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2005Temple0110 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#119 (of 119 teams · 223.6 yds/g · 2,459 yards)#119 (of 119 teams · 9.7 pts/g · 107 points)#98 (of 119 teams · 419.0 yds/g allowed · 4,609 yards)#119 (of 119 teams · 45.2 pts/g allowed · 497 points)#119 (of 119 teams · -35.5 /g · -390 on the season)#87 (of 119 teams · -5 on the season · 23 taken, 28 given · -0.45 /g)#112 (of 119 teams · 15:43 /g · 2h 53m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#116 (of 119 teams · -0.064 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#96 (of 119 teams · 0.120 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#113 (of 119 teams · 30% of plays successful)#109 (of 119 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 119 teams · 1.014 average PPA on successful plays)#11 (of 119 teams · 0.884 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 4 FBS Independents teams in 20050 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#17 (Total offense: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Range #8–#119. 1 of 4 in the top 10.)#15 (Scoring offense: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Range #8–#119. 1 of 4 in the top 10.)#69 (Total defense: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Range #46–#98. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#62 (Scoring defense: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Range #53–#119. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#31 (Point margin: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Range #16–#119. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#72 (Turnover margin: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Range #16–#87. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#35 (Possession: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Range #2–#113. 1 of 4 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#23 (Offensive EPA: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Range #9–#116. 1 of 4 in the top 10.)#85 (Defensive EPA: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Range #77–#104. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#19 (Offensive success rate: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Range #16–#113. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#97 (Defensive success rate: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Range #38–#109. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#57 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Range #50–#65. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#11 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Range #6–#116. 1 of 4 in the top 10.)
2005Army470 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#102 (of 119 teams · 315.9 yds/g · 3,475 yards)#98 (of 119 teams · 20.0 pts/g · 220 points)#46 (of 119 teams · 346.6 yds/g allowed · 3,812 yards)#66 (of 119 teams · 26.7 pts/g allowed · 294 points)#91 (of 119 teams · -6.7 /g · -74 on the season)#72 (of 119 teams · -2 on the season · 18 taken, 20 given · -0.18 /g)#35 (of 119 teams · 18:34 /g · 3h 24m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#91 (of 119 teams · 0.010 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#77 (of 119 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#65 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#97 (of 119 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#64 (of 119 teams · 0.994 average PPA on successful plays)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.854 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Navy840 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#17 (of 119 teams · 435.8 yds/g · 5,230 yards)#15 (of 119 teams · 34.2 pts/g · 410 points)#69 (of 119 teams · 377.3 yds/g allowed · 4,528 yards)#62 (of 119 teams · 26.1 pts/g allowed · 313 points)#31 (of 119 teams · +8.1 /g · +97 on the season)#78 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 18 taken, 22 given · -0.33 /g)#113 (of 119 teams · 15:42 /g · 3h 08m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.161 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#104 (of 119 teams · 0.135 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#19 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#104 (of 119 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#65 (of 119 teams · 0.994 average PPA on successful plays)#24 (of 119 teams · 0.929 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Notre Dame930 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 477.3 yds/g · 5,728 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 36.7 pts/g · 440 points)#81 (of 119 teams · 396.9 yds/g allowed · 4,763 yards)#53 (of 119 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 294 points)#16 (of 119 teams · +12.2 /g · +146 on the season)#16 (of 119 teams · +11 on the season · 25 taken, 14 given · +0.92 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:01 /g · 4h 00m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 119 teams · 0.119 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#85 (of 119 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#16 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#38 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 119 teams · 1.008 average PPA on successful plays)#116 (of 119 teams · 1.151 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

FBS Independents, 20052005 TempleFBS Independents medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #17
Total offense. FBS Independents, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Notre Dame #8 of 119; 2005 Navy #17 of 119; 2005 Army #102 of 119. Marked: 2005 Temple, ranked 119 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 17.
Scoring offensemedian #15
Scoring offense. FBS Independents, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Notre Dame #8 of 119; 2005 Navy #15 of 119; 2005 Army #98 of 119. Marked: 2005 Temple, ranked 119 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 15.
Total defensemedian #69
Total defense. FBS Independents, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Army #46 of 119; 2005 Navy #69 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #81 of 119. Marked: 2005 Temple, ranked 98 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 69.
Scoring defensemedian #62
Scoring defense. FBS Independents, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Notre Dame #53 of 119; 2005 Navy #62 of 119; 2005 Army #66 of 119. Marked: 2005 Temple, ranked 119 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 62.
Point marginmedian #31
Point margin. FBS Independents, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Notre Dame #16 of 119; 2005 Navy #31 of 119; 2005 Army #91 of 119. Marked: 2005 Temple, ranked 119 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 31.
Turnover marginmedian #72
Turnover margin. FBS Independents, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Notre Dame #16 of 119; 2005 Army #72 of 119; 2005 Navy #78 of 119. Marked: 2005 Temple, ranked 87 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 72.
Possessionmedian #35
Possession. FBS Independents, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Notre Dame #2 of 119; 2005 Army #35 of 119; 2005 Navy #113 of 119. Marked: 2005 Temple, ranked 112 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 35.
Returning passing
Returning passing. FBS Independents, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. FBS Independents, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. FBS Independents, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. FBS Independents, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #23
Offensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Navy #9 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #23 of 119; 2005 Army #91 of 119. Marked: 2005 Temple, ranked 116 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 23.
Defensive EPAmedian #85
Defensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Army #77 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #85 of 119; 2005 Navy #104 of 119. Marked: 2005 Temple, ranked 96 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 85.
Offensive success ratemedian #19
Offensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Notre Dame #16 of 119; 2005 Navy #19 of 119; 2005 Army #65 of 119. Marked: 2005 Temple, ranked 113 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 19.
Defensive success ratemedian #97
Defensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Notre Dame #38 of 119; 2005 Army #97 of 119; 2005 Navy #104 of 119. Marked: 2005 Temple, ranked 109 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 97.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #57
Offensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Notre Dame #57 of 119; 2005 Army #64 of 119; 2005 Navy #65 of 119. Marked: 2005 Temple, ranked 50 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 57.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #11
Defensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Army #6 of 119; 2005 Navy #24 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #116 of 119. Marked: 2005 Temple, ranked 11 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 11.