THIRD AND DATA
Sign in

Metrics

TempleOwls

Season
‹
›Current

Mid-American

Mid-American, 2007

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2007Temple4–80 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#114 (of 119 teams · 276.0 yds/g · 3,312 yards)#116 (of 119 teams · 16.4 pts/g · 197 points)#29 (of 119 teams · 332.6 yds/g allowed · 3,991 yards)#53 (of 119 teams · 26.3 pts/g allowed · 315 points)#100 (of 119 teams · -9.8 /g · -118 on the season)#85 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 24 taken, 28 given · -0.33 /g)#112 (of 119 teams · 16:38 /g · 3h 20m on the season)— (— of last season's passing production returning)— (— of last season's receiving production returning)— (— of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#96 (of 119 teams · -0.016 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#89 (of 119 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#90 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#82 (of 119 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#67 (of 119 teams · 0.908 average PPA on successful plays)#61 (of 119 teams · 0.927 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 13 Mid-American teams in 20070 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#79 (Total offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range #15–#114. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#82 (Scoring offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range #20–#116. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#79 (Total defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range #29–#110. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#75 (Scoring defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range #48–#116. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#86 (Point margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range #53–#106. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#52 (Turnover margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range #4–#116. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#86 (Possession: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range #7–#112. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#62 (Offensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range #20–#115. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#76 (Defensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range #23–#116. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#58 (Offensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range #15–#90. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#85 (Defensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range #39–#118. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#82 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range #17–#119. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#52 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range #7–#90. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)
2007Akron4–80 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#110 (of 119 teams · 311.7 yds/g · 3,740 yards)#97 (of 119 teams · 21.2 pts/g · 254 points)#83 (of 119 teams · 408.7 yds/g allowed · 4,904 yards)#75 (of 119 teams · 29.2 pts/g allowed · 350 points)#94 (of 119 teams · -8.0 /g · -96 on the season)#85 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 24 taken, 28 given · -0.33 /g)#86 (of 119 teams · 17:37 /g · 3h 31m on the season)— (— of last season's passing production returning)— (— of last season's receiving production returning)— (— of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#109 (of 119 teams · -0.042 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 119 teams · 0.005 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#82 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#77 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#113 (of 119 teams · 0.815 average PPA on successful plays)#49 (of 119 teams · 0.901 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Ball State7–60 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#47 (of 119 teams · 400.8 yds/g · 5,210 yards)#39 (of 119 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 409 points)#76 (of 119 teams · 399.0 yds/g allowed · 5,187 yards)#68 (of 119 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 368 points)#53 (of 119 teams · +3.1 /g · +41 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17 on the season · 29 taken, 12 given · +1.31 /g)#37 (of 119 teams · 18:52 /g · 4h 05m on the season)— (— of last season's passing production returning)— (— of last season's receiving production returning)— (— of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 119 teams · 0.090 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#104 (of 119 teams · 0.102 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#31 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#92 (of 119 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#29 (of 119 teams · 0.960 average PPA on successful plays)#32 (of 119 teams · 0.875 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Bowling Green8–50 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#46 (of 119 teams · 402.5 yds/g · 5,232 yards)#46 (of 119 teams · 30.1 pts/g · 392 points)#97 (of 119 teams · 424.5 yds/g allowed · 5,518 yards)#94 (of 119 teams · 32.1 pts/g allowed · 417 points)#69 (of 119 teams · -1.9 /g · -25 on the season)#48 (of 119 teams · +1 on the season · 28 taken, 27 given · +0.08 /g)#101 (of 119 teams · 17:17 /g · 3h 45m on the season)— (— of last season's passing production returning)— (— of last season's receiving production returning)— (— of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 119 teams · 0.063 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#77 (of 119 teams · 0.060 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#21 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#114 (of 119 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#41 (of 119 teams · 0.939 average PPA on successful plays)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.790 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Buffalo5–70 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#86 (of 119 teams · 347.9 yds/g · 4,175 yards)#82 (of 119 teams · 24.3 pts/g · 291 points)#79 (of 119 teams · 405.6 yds/g allowed · 4,867 yards)#62 (of 119 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 331 points)#77 (of 119 teams · -3.3 /g · -40 on the season)#36 (of 119 teams · +4 on the season · 21 taken, 17 given · +0.33 /g)#75 (of 119 teams · 17:57 /g · 3h 35m on the season)— (— of last season's passing production returning)— (— of last season's receiving production returning)— (— of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 119 teams · 0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#116 (of 119 teams · 0.150 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#71 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#118 (of 119 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#72 (of 119 teams · 0.904 average PPA on successful plays)#90 (of 119 teams · 0.971 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Central Michigan8–60 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#16 (of 119 teams · 447.0 yds/g · 6,258 yards)#20 (of 119 teams · 34.8 pts/g · 487 points)#110 (of 119 teams · 460.0 yds/g allowed · 6,440 yards)#111 (of 119 teams · 36.9 pts/g allowed · 517 points)#72 (of 119 teams · -2.1 /g · -30 on the season)#28 (of 119 teams · +6 on the season · 30 taken, 24 given · +0.43 /g)#102 (of 119 teams · 17:07 /g · 4h 00m on the season)— (— of last season's passing production returning)— (— of last season's receiving production returning)— (— of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 119 teams · 0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#76 (of 119 teams · 0.055 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#15 (of 119 teams · 45% of plays successful)#90 (of 119 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#85 (of 119 teams · 0.878 average PPA on successful plays)#20 (of 119 teams · 0.840 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Eastern Michigan4–80 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#111 (of 119 teams · 305.8 yds/g · 3,669 yards)#85 (of 119 teams · 24.2 pts/g · 290 points)#65 (of 119 teams · 380.6 yds/g allowed · 4,567 yards)#89 (of 119 teams · 31.2 pts/g allowed · 374 points)#91 (of 119 teams · -7.0 /g · -84 on the season)#21 (of 119 teams · +9 on the season · 29 taken, 20 given · +0.75 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:57 /g · 3h 59m on the season)— (— of last season's passing production returning)— (— of last season's receiving production returning)— (— of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#95 (of 119 teams · -0.015 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#99 (of 119 teams · 0.089 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#58 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#97 (of 119 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#108 (of 119 teams · 0.835 average PPA on successful plays)#64 (of 119 teams · 0.931 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Kent State3–90 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#77 (of 119 teams · 366.7 yds/g · 4,400 yards)#94 (of 119 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 259 points)#68 (of 119 teams · 385.6 yds/g allowed · 4,627 yards)#75 (of 119 teams · 29.2 pts/g allowed · 350 points)#93 (of 119 teams · -7.6 /g · -91 on the season)#110 (of 119 teams · -13 on the season · 17 taken, 30 given · -1.08 /g)#90 (of 119 teams · 17:30 /g · 3h 30m on the season)— (— of last season's passing production returning)— (— of last season's receiving production returning)— (— of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 119 teams · 0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#72 (of 119 teams · 0.046 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#47 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#61 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#45 (of 119 teams · 0.937 average PPA on successful plays)#48 (of 119 teams · 0.898 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Miami (OH)6–70 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#91 (of 119 teams · 338.4 yds/g · 4,399 yards)#108 (of 119 teams · 19.2 pts/g · 250 points)#41 (of 119 teams · 352.5 yds/g allowed · 4,582 yards)#48 (of 119 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 333 points)#87 (of 119 teams · -6.4 /g · -83 on the season)#61 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 26 taken, 27 given · -0.08 /g)#107 (of 119 teams · 16:50 /g · 3h 39m on the season)— (— of last season's passing production returning)— (— of last season's receiving production returning)— (— of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#115 (of 119 teams · -0.058 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#60 (of 119 teams · 0.035 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#84 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#85 (of 119 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#93 (of 119 teams · 0.866 average PPA on successful plays)#52 (of 119 teams · 0.910 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Northern Illinois2–100 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#92 (of 119 teams · 337.9 yds/g · 4,055 yards)#109 (of 119 teams · 19.1 pts/g · 229 points)#99 (of 119 teams · 434.3 yds/g allowed · 5,211 yards)#86 (of 119 teams · 30.8 pts/g allowed · 370 points)#106 (of 119 teams · -11.8 /g · -141 on the season)#116 (of 119 teams · -17 on the season · 17 taken, 34 given · -1.42 /g)#95 (of 119 teams · 17:27 /g · 3h 29m on the season)— (— of last season's passing production returning)— (— of last season's receiving production returning)— (— of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#94 (of 119 teams · -0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#111 (of 119 teams · 0.116 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#67 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#83 (of 119 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#119 (of 119 teams · 0.769 average PPA on successful plays)#59 (of 119 teams · 0.926 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Ohio6–60 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#78 (of 119 teams · 364.5 yds/g · 4,374 yards)#44 (of 119 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 366 points)#81 (of 119 teams · 407.7 yds/g allowed · 4,892 yards)#81 (of 119 teams · 29.9 pts/g allowed · 359 points)#62 (of 119 teams · +0.6 /g · +7 on the season)#43 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 26 taken, 24 given · +0.17 /g)#57 (of 119 teams · 18:24 /g · 3h 41m on the season)— (— of last season's passing production returning)— (— of last season's receiving production returning)— (— of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#81 (of 119 teams · 0.002 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#56 (of 119 teams · 0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#72 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#68 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#82 (of 119 teams · 0.885 average PPA on successful plays)#88 (of 119 teams · 0.968 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Toledo5–70 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#15 (of 119 teams · 448.4 yds/g · 5,381 yards)#31 (of 119 teams · 32.9 pts/g · 395 points)#103 (of 119 teams · 444.1 yds/g allowed · 5,329 yards)#116 (of 119 teams · 39.2 pts/g allowed · 470 points)#86 (of 119 teams · -6.3 /g · -75 on the season)#52 (of 119 teams · +0 on the season · 26 taken, 26 given · +0.00 /g)#36 (of 119 teams · 18:54 /g · 3h 47m on the season)— (— of last season's passing production returning)— (— of last season's receiving production returning)— (— of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 119 teams · 0.084 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#73 (of 119 teams · 0.053 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#57 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#105 (of 119 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#17 (of 119 teams · 0.989 average PPA on successful plays)#17 (of 119 teams · 0.836 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Western Michigan5–70 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2007. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#79 (of 119 teams · 361.9 yds/g · 4,343 yards)#65 (of 119 teams · 26.9 pts/g · 323 points)#46 (of 119 teams · 363.4 yds/g allowed · 4,361 yards)#73 (of 119 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 347 points)#70 (of 119 teams · -2.0 /g · -24 on the season)#99 (of 119 teams · -8 on the season · 25 taken, 33 given · -0.67 /g)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:56 /g · 3h 59m on the season)— (— of last season's passing production returning)— (— of last season's receiving production returning)— (— of last season's rushing production returning)— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 119 teams · 0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 119 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#52 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#39 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#103 (of 119 teams · 0.850 average PPA on successful plays)#70 (of 119 teams · 0.943 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mid-American, 20072007 TempleMid-American medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #79
Total offense. Mid-American, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Toledo #15 of 119; 2007 Central Michigan #16 of 119; 2007 Bowling Green #46 of 119; 2007 Ball State #47 of 119; 2007 Kent State #77 of 119; 2007 Ohio #78 of 119; 2007 Western Michigan #79 of 119; 2007 Buffalo #86 of 119; 2007 Miami (OH) #91 of 119; 2007 Northern Illinois #92 of 119; 2007 Akron #110 of 119; 2007 Eastern Michigan #111 of 119. Marked: 2007 Temple, ranked 114 of 119. Mid-American median rank 79.
Scoring offensemedian #82
Scoring offense. Mid-American, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Central Michigan #20 of 119; 2007 Toledo #31 of 119; 2007 Ball State #39 of 119; 2007 Ohio #44 of 119; 2007 Bowling Green #46 of 119; 2007 Western Michigan #65 of 119; 2007 Buffalo #82 of 119; 2007 Eastern Michigan #85 of 119; 2007 Kent State #94 of 119; 2007 Akron #97 of 119; 2007 Miami (OH) #108 of 119; 2007 Northern Illinois #109 of 119. Marked: 2007 Temple, ranked 116 of 119. Mid-American median rank 82.
Total defensemedian #79
Total defense. Mid-American, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Miami (OH) #41 of 119; 2007 Western Michigan #46 of 119; 2007 Eastern Michigan #65 of 119; 2007 Kent State #68 of 119; 2007 Ball State #76 of 119; 2007 Buffalo #79 of 119; 2007 Ohio #81 of 119; 2007 Akron #83 of 119; 2007 Bowling Green #97 of 119; 2007 Northern Illinois #99 of 119; 2007 Toledo #103 of 119; 2007 Central Michigan #110 of 119. Marked: 2007 Temple, ranked 29 of 119. Mid-American median rank 79.
Scoring defensemedian #75
Scoring defense. Mid-American, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Miami (OH) #48 of 119; 2007 Buffalo #62 of 119; 2007 Ball State #68 of 119; 2007 Western Michigan #73 of 119; 2007 Akron #75 of 119; 2007 Kent State #75 of 119; 2007 Ohio #81 of 119; 2007 Northern Illinois #86 of 119; 2007 Eastern Michigan #89 of 119; 2007 Bowling Green #94 of 119; 2007 Central Michigan #111 of 119; 2007 Toledo #116 of 119. Marked: 2007 Temple, ranked 53 of 119. Mid-American median rank 75.
Point marginmedian #86
Point margin. Mid-American, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Ball State #53 of 119; 2007 Ohio #62 of 119; 2007 Bowling Green #69 of 119; 2007 Western Michigan #70 of 119; 2007 Central Michigan #72 of 119; 2007 Buffalo #77 of 119; 2007 Toledo #86 of 119; 2007 Miami (OH) #87 of 119; 2007 Eastern Michigan #91 of 119; 2007 Kent State #93 of 119; 2007 Akron #94 of 119; 2007 Northern Illinois #106 of 119. Marked: 2007 Temple, ranked 100 of 119. Mid-American median rank 86.
Turnover marginmedian #52
Turnover margin. Mid-American, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Ball State #4 of 119; 2007 Eastern Michigan #21 of 119; 2007 Central Michigan #28 of 119; 2007 Buffalo #36 of 119; 2007 Ohio #43 of 119; 2007 Bowling Green #48 of 119; 2007 Toledo #52 of 119; 2007 Miami (OH) #61 of 119; 2007 Akron #85 of 119; 2007 Western Michigan #99 of 119; 2007 Kent State #110 of 119; 2007 Northern Illinois #116 of 119. Marked: 2007 Temple, ranked 85 of 119. Mid-American median rank 52.
Possessionmedian #86
Possession. Mid-American, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Eastern Michigan #7 of 119; 2007 Western Michigan #8 of 119; 2007 Toledo #36 of 119; 2007 Ball State #37 of 119; 2007 Ohio #57 of 119; 2007 Buffalo #75 of 119; 2007 Akron #86 of 119; 2007 Kent State #90 of 119; 2007 Northern Illinois #95 of 119; 2007 Bowling Green #101 of 119; 2007 Central Michigan #102 of 119; 2007 Miami (OH) #107 of 119. Marked: 2007 Temple, ranked 112 of 119. Mid-American median rank 86.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Mid-American, 2007, best rank first: . Marked: 2007 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Mid-American, 2007, best rank first: . Marked: 2007 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Mid-American, 2007, best rank first: . Marked: 2007 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Mid-American, 2007, best rank first: . Marked: 2007 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #62
Offensive EPA. Mid-American, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Ball State #20 of 119; 2007 Toledo #24 of 119; 2007 Central Michigan #34 of 119; 2007 Bowling Green #36 of 119; 2007 Western Michigan #60 of 119; 2007 Buffalo #61 of 119; 2007 Kent State #62 of 119; 2007 Ohio #81 of 119; 2007 Northern Illinois #94 of 119; 2007 Eastern Michigan #95 of 119; 2007 Akron #109 of 119; 2007 Miami (OH) #115 of 119. Marked: 2007 Temple, ranked 96 of 119. Mid-American median rank 62.
Defensive EPAmedian #76
Defensive EPA. Mid-American, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Western Michigan #23 of 119; 2007 Akron #33 of 119; 2007 Ohio #56 of 119; 2007 Miami (OH) #60 of 119; 2007 Kent State #72 of 119; 2007 Toledo #73 of 119; 2007 Central Michigan #76 of 119; 2007 Bowling Green #77 of 119; 2007 Eastern Michigan #99 of 119; 2007 Ball State #104 of 119; 2007 Northern Illinois #111 of 119; 2007 Buffalo #116 of 119. Marked: 2007 Temple, ranked 89 of 119. Mid-American median rank 76.
Offensive success ratemedian #58
Offensive success rate. Mid-American, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Central Michigan #15 of 119; 2007 Bowling Green #21 of 119; 2007 Ball State #31 of 119; 2007 Kent State #47 of 119; 2007 Western Michigan #52 of 119; 2007 Toledo #57 of 119; 2007 Eastern Michigan #58 of 119; 2007 Northern Illinois #67 of 119; 2007 Buffalo #71 of 119; 2007 Ohio #72 of 119; 2007 Akron #82 of 119; 2007 Miami (OH) #84 of 119. Marked: 2007 Temple, ranked 90 of 119. Mid-American median rank 58.
Defensive success ratemedian #85
Defensive success rate. Mid-American, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Western Michigan #39 of 119; 2007 Kent State #61 of 119; 2007 Ohio #68 of 119; 2007 Akron #77 of 119; 2007 Northern Illinois #83 of 119; 2007 Miami (OH) #85 of 119; 2007 Central Michigan #90 of 119; 2007 Ball State #92 of 119; 2007 Eastern Michigan #97 of 119; 2007 Toledo #105 of 119; 2007 Bowling Green #114 of 119; 2007 Buffalo #118 of 119. Marked: 2007 Temple, ranked 82 of 119. Mid-American median rank 85.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #82
Offensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Toledo #17 of 119; 2007 Ball State #29 of 119; 2007 Bowling Green #41 of 119; 2007 Kent State #45 of 119; 2007 Buffalo #72 of 119; 2007 Ohio #82 of 119; 2007 Central Michigan #85 of 119; 2007 Miami (OH) #93 of 119; 2007 Western Michigan #103 of 119; 2007 Eastern Michigan #108 of 119; 2007 Akron #113 of 119; 2007 Northern Illinois #119 of 119. Marked: 2007 Temple, ranked 67 of 119. Mid-American median rank 82.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #52
Defensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Bowling Green #7 of 119; 2007 Toledo #17 of 119; 2007 Central Michigan #20 of 119; 2007 Ball State #32 of 119; 2007 Kent State #48 of 119; 2007 Akron #49 of 119; 2007 Miami (OH) #52 of 119; 2007 Northern Illinois #59 of 119; 2007 Eastern Michigan #64 of 119; 2007 Western Michigan #70 of 119; 2007 Ohio #88 of 119; 2007 Buffalo #90 of 119. Marked: 2007 Temple, ranked 61 of 119. Mid-American median rank 52.