Metrics

TempleOwls

Season
Current

FBS Independents

FBS Independents, 2006

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2006Temple1110 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#119 (of 119 teams · 197.3 yds/g · 2,367 yards)#116 (of 119 teams · 10.9 pts/g · 131 points)#111 (of 119 teams · 405.8 yds/g allowed · 4,870 yards)#118 (of 119 teams · 41.3 pts/g allowed · 496 points)#119 (of 119 teams · -30.4 /g · -365 on the season)#112 (of 119 teams · -13 on the season · 15 taken, 28 given · -1.08 /g)#114 (of 119 teams · 16:26 /g · 3h 17m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#115 (of 119 teams · -0.084 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#89 (of 119 teams · 0.087 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#115 (of 119 teams · 31% of plays successful)#102 (of 119 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#76 (of 119 teams · 0.910 average PPA on successful plays)#32 (of 119 teams · 0.879 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 4 FBS Independents teams in 20060 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#26 (Total offense: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Range #21–#119. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#32 (Scoring offense: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Range #16–#116. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#69 (Total defense: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Range #64–#111. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#67 (Scoring defense: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Range #41–#118. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#38 (Point margin: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Range #29–#119. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#64 (Turnover margin: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Range #30–#119. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#39 (Possession: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Range #16–#114. 0 of 4 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#25 (Offensive EPA: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Range #14–#115. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#74 (Defensive EPA: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Range #45–#96. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#23 (Offensive success rate: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Range #11–#115. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#79 (Defensive success rate: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Range #70–#104. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#76 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Range #64–#117. 0 of 4 in the top 10.)#26 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Range #4–#54. 1 of 4 in the top 10.)
2006Army390 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#111 (of 119 teams · 261.0 yds/g · 3,132 yards)#90 (of 119 teams · 19.3 pts/g · 232 points)#82 (of 119 teams · 354.8 yds/g allowed · 4,258 yards)#96 (of 119 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 335 points)#97 (of 119 teams · -8.6 /g · -103 on the season)#119 (of 119 teams · -20 on the season · 19 taken, 39 given · -1.67 /g)#106 (of 119 teams · 17:04 /g · 3h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#107 (of 119 teams · -0.051 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#96 (of 119 teams · 0.096 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#57 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#104 (of 119 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#117 (of 119 teams · 0.771 average PPA on successful plays)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.806 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Navy940 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#26 (of 119 teams · 383.0 yds/g · 4,979 yards)#32 (of 119 teams · 28.2 pts/g · 367 points)#64 (of 119 teams · 335.1 yds/g allowed · 4,357 yards)#41 (of 119 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 261 points)#29 (of 119 teams · +8.2 /g · +106 on the season)#64 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 23 taken, 24 given · -0.08 /g)#16 (of 119 teams · 19:17 /g · 4h 11m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 119 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#74 (of 119 teams · 0.053 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#11 (of 119 teams · 46% of plays successful)#70 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#114 (of 119 teams · 0.797 average PPA on successful plays)#54 (of 119 teams · 0.933 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Notre Dame1030 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#21 (of 119 teams · 389.8 yds/g · 5,067 yards)#16 (of 119 teams · 31.0 pts/g · 403 points)#69 (of 119 teams · 340.2 yds/g allowed · 4,423 yards)#67 (of 119 teams · 23.9 pts/g allowed · 310 points)#38 (of 119 teams · +7.2 /g · +93 on the season)#30 (of 119 teams · +6 on the season · 21 taken, 15 given · +0.46 /g)#39 (of 119 teams · 18:42 /g · 4h 03m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 119 teams · 0.093 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#45 (of 119 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#23 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#79 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#64 (of 119 teams · 0.930 average PPA on successful plays)#26 (of 119 teams · 0.863 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

FBS Independents, 20062006 TempleFBS Independents medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #26
Total offense. FBS Independents, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Notre Dame #21 of 119; 2006 Navy #26 of 119; 2006 Army #111 of 119. Marked: 2006 Temple, ranked 119 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 26.
Scoring offensemedian #32
Scoring offense. FBS Independents, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Notre Dame #16 of 119; 2006 Navy #32 of 119; 2006 Army #90 of 119. Marked: 2006 Temple, ranked 116 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 32.
Total defensemedian #69
Total defense. FBS Independents, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Navy #64 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #69 of 119; 2006 Army #82 of 119. Marked: 2006 Temple, ranked 111 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 69.
Scoring defensemedian #67
Scoring defense. FBS Independents, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Navy #41 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #67 of 119; 2006 Army #96 of 119. Marked: 2006 Temple, ranked 118 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 67.
Point marginmedian #38
Point margin. FBS Independents, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Navy #29 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #38 of 119; 2006 Army #97 of 119. Marked: 2006 Temple, ranked 119 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 38.
Turnover marginmedian #64
Turnover margin. FBS Independents, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Notre Dame #30 of 119; 2006 Navy #64 of 119; 2006 Army #119 of 119. Marked: 2006 Temple, ranked 112 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 64.
Possessionmedian #39
Possession. FBS Independents, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Navy #16 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #39 of 119; 2006 Army #106 of 119. Marked: 2006 Temple, ranked 114 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 39.
Returning passing
Returning passing. FBS Independents, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. FBS Independents, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. FBS Independents, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. FBS Independents, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Temple, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #25
Offensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Navy #14 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #25 of 119; 2006 Army #107 of 119. Marked: 2006 Temple, ranked 115 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 25.
Defensive EPAmedian #74
Defensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Notre Dame #45 of 119; 2006 Navy #74 of 119; 2006 Army #96 of 119. Marked: 2006 Temple, ranked 89 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 74.
Offensive success ratemedian #23
Offensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Navy #11 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #23 of 119; 2006 Army #57 of 119. Marked: 2006 Temple, ranked 115 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 23.
Defensive success ratemedian #79
Defensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Navy #70 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #79 of 119; 2006 Army #104 of 119. Marked: 2006 Temple, ranked 102 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 79.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #76
Offensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Notre Dame #64 of 119; 2006 Navy #114 of 119; 2006 Army #117 of 119. Marked: 2006 Temple, ranked 76 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 76.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #26
Defensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Army #4 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #26 of 119; 2006 Navy #54 of 119. Marked: 2006 Temple, ranked 32 of 119. FBS Independents median rank 26.