Metrics

UCLABruins

Season
Current

Pac-10

Pac-10, 2004

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2004UCLA660 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#27 (of 119 teams · 410.0 yds/g · 4,920 yards)#29 (of 119 teams · 30.1 pts/g · 361 points)#110 (of 119 teams · 432.9 yds/g allowed · 5,195 yards)#66 (of 119 teams · 25.8 pts/g allowed · 309 points)#41 (of 119 teams · +4.3 /g · +52 on the season)#95 (of 119 teams · -7 on the season · 19 taken, 26 given · -0.58 /g)#92 (of 119 teams · 17:16 /g · 3h 27m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 119 teams · -0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#77 (of 119 teams · -0.011 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#38 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#57 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#42 (of 119 teams · 1.029 average PPA on successful plays)#97 (of 119 teams · 1.053 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Pac-10 teams in 20040 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#36 (Total offense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range #5–#109. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#50 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range #6–#119. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#51 (Total defense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range #9–#110. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#49 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range #3–#84. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#50 (Point margin: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range #3–#112. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#51 (Turnover margin: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range #1–#119. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#35 (Possession: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range #4–#106. 1 of 10 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#58 (Offensive EPA: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range #4–#111. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive EPA: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range #13–#77. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#56 (Offensive success rate: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range #3–#105. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#21 (Defensive success rate: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range #4–#72. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#42 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range #5–#81. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#84 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range #31–#110. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)
2004Arizona380 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#109 (of 119 teams · 288.9 yds/g · 3,178 yards)#118 (of 119 teams · 14.9 pts/g · 164 points)#67 (of 119 teams · 379.4 yds/g allowed · 4,173 yards)#56 (of 119 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 275 points)#98 (of 119 teams · -10.1 /g · -111 on the season)#40 (of 119 teams · +4 on the season · 29 taken, 25 given · +0.36 /g)#45 (of 119 teams · 18:25 /g · 3h 23m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#67 (of 119 teams · -0.090 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#56 (of 119 teams · -0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#79 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#72 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#71 (of 119 teams · 0.969 average PPA on successful plays)#36 (of 119 teams · 0.939 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Arizona State930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#15 (of 119 teams · 435.4 yds/g · 5,225 yards)#32 (of 119 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 358 points)#51 (of 119 teams · 358.9 yds/g allowed · 4,307 yards)#49 (of 119 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 294 points)#37 (of 119 teams · +5.3 /g · +64 on the season)#51 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 29 taken, 27 given · +0.17 /g)#35 (of 119 teams · 18:39 /g · 3h 44m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 119 teams · -0.072 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#45 (of 119 teams · -0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#56 (of 119 teams · 35% of plays successful)#42 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#18 (of 119 teams · 1.086 average PPA on successful plays)#89 (of 119 teams · 1.036 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004California1020 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 492.4 yds/g · 5,909 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 36.8 pts/g · 441 points)#28 (of 119 teams · 320.9 yds/g allowed · 3,851 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 16.0 pts/g allowed · 192 points)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +20.8 /g · +249 on the season)#51 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 22 taken, 20 given · +0.17 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:19 /g · 4h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.101 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#36 (of 119 teams · -0.074 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 45% of plays successful)#20 (of 119 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#81 (of 119 teams · 0.957 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 119 teams · 1.032 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Oregon560 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#36 (of 119 teams · 397.0 yds/g · 4,367 yards)#56 (of 119 teams · 25.6 pts/g · 282 points)#39 (of 119 teams · 338.9 yds/g allowed · 3,728 yards)#63 (of 119 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 282 points)#61 (of 119 teams · +0.0 /g · +0 on the season)#82 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 23 taken, 27 given · -0.36 /g)#33 (of 119 teams · 18:45 /g · 3h 26m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 119 teams · -0.016 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 119 teams · -0.077 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#33 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#17 (of 119 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#27 (of 119 teams · 1.054 average PPA on successful plays)#109 (of 119 teams · 1.132 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Oregon State750 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#52 (of 119 teams · 379.5 yds/g · 4,554 yards)#50 (of 119 teams · 26.7 pts/g · 320 points)#22 (of 119 teams · 313.3 yds/g allowed · 3,760 yards)#49 (of 119 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 294 points)#50 (of 119 teams · +2.2 /g · +26 on the season)#45 (of 119 teams · +3 on the season · 34 taken, 31 given · +0.25 /g)#28 (of 119 teams · 18:49 /g · 3h 46m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 (of 119 teams · -0.091 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 119 teams · -0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#89 (of 119 teams · 32% of plays successful)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 28% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#14 (of 119 teams · 1.100 average PPA on successful plays)#110 (of 119 teams · 1.132 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Stanford470 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#89 (of 119 teams · 328.4 yds/g · 3,613 yards)#87 (of 119 teams · 22.0 pts/g · 242 points)#77 (of 119 teams · 392.3 yds/g allowed · 4,315 yards)#34 (of 119 teams · 21.2 pts/g allowed · 233 points)#59 (of 119 teams · +0.8 /g · +9 on the season)#17 (of 119 teams · +8 on the season · 29 taken, 21 given · +0.73 /g)#96 (of 119 teams · 17:07 /g · 3h 08m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#77 (of 119 teams · -0.113 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#69 (of 119 teams · -0.028 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#84 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#47 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#78 (of 119 teams · 0.961 average PPA on successful plays)#106 (of 119 teams · 1.098 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004USC1300 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#11 (of 119 teams · 449.1 yds/g · 5,838 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 38.1 pts/g · 496 points)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 280.4 yds/g allowed · 3,645 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 13.0 pts/g allowed · 169 points)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +25.1 /g · +327 on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +24 on the season · 43 taken, 19 given · +1.85 /g)#14 (of 119 teams · 19:17 /g · 4h 11m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 119 teams · 0.019 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#16 (of 119 teams · -0.121 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#21 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#58 (of 119 teams · 0.997 average PPA on successful plays)#31 (of 119 teams · 0.930 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Washington1100 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#99 (of 119 teams · 311.0 yds/g · 3,421 yards)#119 (of 119 teams · 14.0 pts/g · 154 points)#58 (of 119 teams · 369.4 yds/g allowed · 4,064 yards)#84 (of 119 teams · 30.4 pts/g allowed · 334 points)#112 (of 119 teams · -16.4 /g · -180 on the season)#119 (of 119 teams · -21 on the season · 25 taken, 46 given · -1.91 /g)#86 (of 119 teams · 17:26 /g · 3h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#111 (of 119 teams · -0.185 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 119 teams · -0.073 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#99 (of 119 teams · 31% of plays successful)#41 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#51 (of 119 teams · 1.014 average PPA on successful plays)#68 (of 119 teams · 1.000 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Washington State560 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#62 (of 119 teams · 368.6 yds/g · 4,055 yards)#58 (of 119 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 275 points)#56 (of 119 teams · 366.6 yds/g allowed · 4,033 yards)#75 (of 119 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 307 points)#75 (of 119 teams · -2.9 /g · -32 on the season)#66 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 33 taken, 34 given · -0.09 /g)#106 (of 119 teams · 16:36 /g · 3h 03m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#100 (of 119 teams · -0.151 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#14 (of 119 teams · -0.124 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#105 (of 119 teams · 29% of plays successful)#12 (of 119 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.172 average PPA on successful plays)#55 (of 119 teams · 0.980 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Pac-10, 20042004 UCLAPac-10 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #36
Total offense. Pac-10, 2004, best rank first: 2004 California #5 of 119; 2004 USC #11 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #15 of 119; 2004 Oregon #36 of 119; 2004 Oregon State #52 of 119; 2004 Washington State #62 of 119; 2004 Stanford #89 of 119; 2004 Washington #99 of 119; 2004 Arizona #109 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCLA, ranked 27 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 36.
Scoring offensemedian #50
Scoring offense. Pac-10, 2004, best rank first: 2004 USC #6 of 119; 2004 California #7 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #32 of 119; 2004 Oregon State #50 of 119; 2004 Oregon #56 of 119; 2004 Washington State #58 of 119; 2004 Stanford #87 of 119; 2004 Arizona #118 of 119; 2004 Washington #119 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCLA, ranked 29 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 50.
Total defensemedian #51
Total defense. Pac-10, 2004, best rank first: 2004 USC #9 of 119; 2004 Oregon State #22 of 119; 2004 California #28 of 119; 2004 Oregon #39 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #51 of 119; 2004 Washington State #56 of 119; 2004 Washington #58 of 119; 2004 Arizona #67 of 119; 2004 Stanford #77 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCLA, ranked 110 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 51.
Scoring defensemedian #49
Scoring defense. Pac-10, 2004, best rank first: 2004 USC #3 of 119; 2004 California #8 of 119; 2004 Stanford #34 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #49 of 119; 2004 Oregon State #49 of 119; 2004 Arizona #56 of 119; 2004 Oregon #63 of 119; 2004 Washington State #75 of 119; 2004 Washington #84 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCLA, ranked 66 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 49.
Point marginmedian #50
Point margin. Pac-10, 2004, best rank first: 2004 USC #3 of 119; 2004 California #7 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #37 of 119; 2004 Oregon State #50 of 119; 2004 Stanford #59 of 119; 2004 Oregon #61 of 119; 2004 Washington State #75 of 119; 2004 Arizona #98 of 119; 2004 Washington #112 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCLA, ranked 41 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 50.
Turnover marginmedian #51
Turnover margin. Pac-10, 2004, best rank first: 2004 USC #1 of 119; 2004 Stanford #17 of 119; 2004 Arizona #40 of 119; 2004 Oregon State #45 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #51 of 119; 2004 California #51 of 119; 2004 Washington State #66 of 119; 2004 Oregon #82 of 119; 2004 Washington #119 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCLA, ranked 95 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 51.
Possessionmedian #35
Possession. Pac-10, 2004, best rank first: 2004 California #4 of 119; 2004 USC #14 of 119; 2004 Oregon State #28 of 119; 2004 Oregon #33 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #35 of 119; 2004 Arizona #45 of 119; 2004 Washington #86 of 119; 2004 Stanford #96 of 119; 2004 Washington State #106 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCLA, ranked 92 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 35.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Pac-10, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 UCLA, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Pac-10, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 UCLA, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Pac-10, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 UCLA, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Pac-10, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 UCLA, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #58
Offensive EPA. Pac-10, 2004, best rank first: 2004 California #4 of 119; 2004 USC #23 of 119; 2004 Oregon #31 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #58 of 119; 2004 Arizona #67 of 119; 2004 Oregon State #69 of 119; 2004 Stanford #77 of 119; 2004 Washington State #100 of 119; 2004 Washington #111 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCLA, ranked 39 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 58.
Defensive EPAmedian #36
Defensive EPA. Pac-10, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Oregon State #13 of 119; 2004 Washington State #14 of 119; 2004 USC #16 of 119; 2004 Oregon #35 of 119; 2004 California #36 of 119; 2004 Washington #37 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #45 of 119; 2004 Arizona #56 of 119; 2004 Stanford #69 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCLA, ranked 77 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 36.
Offensive success ratemedian #56
Offensive success rate. Pac-10, 2004, best rank first: 2004 California #3 of 119; 2004 USC #20 of 119; 2004 Oregon #33 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #56 of 119; 2004 Arizona #79 of 119; 2004 Stanford #84 of 119; 2004 Oregon State #89 of 119; 2004 Washington #99 of 119; 2004 Washington State #105 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCLA, ranked 38 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 56.
Defensive success ratemedian #21
Defensive success rate. Pac-10, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Oregon State #4 of 119; 2004 Washington State #12 of 119; 2004 Oregon #17 of 119; 2004 California #20 of 119; 2004 USC #21 of 119; 2004 Washington #41 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #42 of 119; 2004 Stanford #47 of 119; 2004 Arizona #72 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCLA, ranked 57 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 21.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #42
Offensive explosiveness. Pac-10, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Washington State #5 of 119; 2004 Oregon State #14 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #18 of 119; 2004 Oregon #27 of 119; 2004 Washington #51 of 119; 2004 USC #58 of 119; 2004 Arizona #71 of 119; 2004 Stanford #78 of 119; 2004 California #81 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCLA, ranked 42 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 42.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #84
Defensive explosiveness. Pac-10, 2004, best rank first: 2004 USC #31 of 119; 2004 Arizona #36 of 119; 2004 Washington State #55 of 119; 2004 Washington #68 of 119; 2004 California #84 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #89 of 119; 2004 Stanford #106 of 119; 2004 Oregon #109 of 119; 2004 Oregon State #110 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCLA, ranked 97 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 84.