THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

UCLABruins

Season
‹
›Current

Pac-12

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

Pac-12, 2013

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2013UCLA10–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#38 (of 125 teams · 448.5 yds/g · 5,830 yds)#20 (of 125 teams · 36.9 pts/g · 480 points)#54 (of 125 teams · 385.9 yds/g allowed · 5,017 yds)#35 (of 125 teams · 23.1 pts/g allowed · 301 points)#21 (of 125 teams · +13.8 /g · +179 on the season)#19 (of 125 teams · +10 on the season · 26 taken, 16 given · +0.77 /g)#76 (of 125 teams · 29:35 /g · 6h 25m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 125 teams · 0.156 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#91 (of 125 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#37 (of 125 teams · 45% of plays successful)#93 (of 125 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 125 teams · 0.959 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 125 teams · 0.876 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Pac-12 teams in 20130 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#34 (Total offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #2–#88. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#36 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #4–#97. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Total defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #13–#124. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#39 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #10–#124. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#35 (Point margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #3–#118. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#39 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #7–#124. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#76 (Possession: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #2–#122. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#54 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #4–#118. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#49 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #11–#102. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#41 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #6–#103. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#39 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #13–#93. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#27 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #5–#120. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#63 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #9–#119. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2013Oregon11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 565.0 yds/g · 7,345 yds)#4 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 45.5 pts/g · 591 points)#37 (of 125 teams · 370.1 yds/g allowed · 4,811 yds)#13 (of 125 teams · 20.5 pts/g allowed · 266 points)#3 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +25.0 /g · +325 on the season)#14 (of 125 teams · +11 on the season · 29 taken, 18 given · +0.85 /g)#122 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 26:02 /g · 5h 38m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.208 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#14 (of 125 teams · 0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#6 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 50% of plays successful)#31 (of 125 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#19 (of 125 teams · 1.008 average PPA on successful plays)#9 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.850 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Arizona State10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#32 (of 125 teams · 457.3 yds/g · 6,402 yds)#10 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 39.7 pts/g · 556 points)#42 (of 125 teams · 372.4 yds/g allowed · 5,213 yds)#64 (of 125 teams · 26.6 pts/g allowed · 373 points)#27 (of 125 teams · +13.1 /g · +183 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +15 on the season · 33 taken, 18 given · +1.07 /g)#56 (of 125 teams · 30:17 /g · 7h 04m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 125 teams · 0.088 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#77 (of 125 teams · 0.090 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#38 (of 125 teams · 45% of plays successful)#23 (of 125 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#89 (of 125 teams · 0.906 average PPA on successful plays)#119 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 1.075 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Stanford11–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#70 (of 125 teams · 405.4 yds/g · 5,675 yds)#45 (of 125 teams · 32.3 pts/g · 452 points)#16 (of 125 teams · 343.1 yds/g allowed · 4,804 yds)#10 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 19.0 pts/g allowed · 266 points)#25 (of 125 teams · +13.3 /g · +186 on the season)#61 (of 125 teams · +0 on the season · 19 taken, 19 given · +0.00 /g)#37 (of 125 teams · 31:35 /g · 7h 22m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 125 teams · 0.096 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#40 (of 125 teams · 0.057 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#58 (of 125 teams · 43% of plays successful)#38 (of 125 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#88 (of 125 teams · 0.907 average PPA on successful plays)#97 (of 125 teams · 1.004 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013USC10–45 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#73 (of 125 teams · 399.9 yds/g · 5,599 yds)#60 (of 125 teams · 29.7 pts/g · 416 points)#13 (of 125 teams · 335.2 yds/g allowed · 4,693 yds)#16 (of 125 teams · 21.2 pts/g allowed · 297 points)#37 (of 125 teams · +8.5 /g · +119 on the season)#36 (of 125 teams · +5 on the season · 22 taken, 17 given · +0.36 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 34:18 /g · 8h 00m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 125 teams · 0.100 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#11 (of 125 teams · -0.000 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#78 (of 125 teams · 41% of plays successful)#13 (of 125 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#24 (of 125 teams · 0.995 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 125 teams · 0.948 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Washington9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#13 (of 125 teams · 499.3 yds/g · 6,491 yds)#18 (of 125 teams · 37.9 pts/g · 493 points)#56 (of 125 teams · 388.5 yds/g allowed · 5,051 yds)#29 (of 125 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 297 points)#15 (of 125 teams · +15.1 /g · +196 on the season)#24 (of 125 teams · +7 on the season · 23 taken, 16 given · +0.54 /g)#83 (of 125 teams · 29:14 /g · 6h 20m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 125 teams · 0.165 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#27 (of 125 teams · 0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#41 (of 125 teams · 45% of plays successful)#41 (of 125 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#5 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 1.058 average PPA on successful plays)#35 (of 125 teams · 0.906 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Oregon State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#26 (of 125 teams · 467.0 yds/g · 6,071 yds)#29 (of 125 teams · 34.8 pts/g · 452 points)#101 (of 125 teams · 436.6 yds/g allowed · 5,676 yds)#91 (of 125 teams · 31.4 pts/g allowed · 408 points)#61 (of 125 teams · +3.4 /g · +44 on the season)#42 (of 125 teams · +3 on the season · 29 taken, 26 given · +0.23 /g)#25 (of 125 teams · 32:09 /g · 6h 58m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 125 teams · 0.117 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#102 (of 125 teams · 0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#23 (of 125 teams · 46% of plays successful)#90 (of 125 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#27 (of 125 teams · 0.993 average PPA on successful plays)#63 (of 125 teams · 0.945 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Washington State6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#54 (of 125 teams · 421.4 yds/g · 5,478 yds)#52 (of 125 teams · 31.0 pts/g · 403 points)#103 (of 125 teams · 458.0 yds/g allowed · 5,954 yds)#97 (of 125 teams · 32.5 pts/g allowed · 423 points)#76 (of 125 teams · -1.5 /g · -20 on the season)#93 (of 125 teams · -5 on the season · 30 taken, 35 given · -0.38 /g)#84 (of 125 teams · 29:13 /g · 6h 20m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#83 (of 125 teams · 0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#49 (of 125 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#67 (of 125 teams · 43% of plays successful)#89 (of 125 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#21 (of 125 teams · 1.000 average PPA on successful plays)#12 (of 125 teams · 0.860 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Arizona8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#31 (of 125 teams · 458.5 yds/g · 5,960 yds)#36 (of 125 teams · 33.5 pts/g · 435 points)#63 (of 125 teams · 401.1 yds/g allowed · 5,214 yds)#39 (of 125 teams · 24.2 pts/g allowed · 315 points)#35 (of 125 teams · +9.2 /g · +120 on the season)#39 (of 125 teams · +4 on the season · 22 taken, 18 given · +0.31 /g)#104 (of 125 teams · 28:35 /g · 6h 12m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 125 teams · 0.100 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#26 (of 125 teams · 0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#33 (of 125 teams · 45% of plays successful)#39 (of 125 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#116 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 0.849 average PPA on successful plays)#56 (of 125 teams · 0.930 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Utah5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#77 (of 125 teams · 396.6 yds/g · 4,759 yds)#66 (of 125 teams · 29.2 pts/g · 350 points)#61 (of 125 teams · 397.7 yds/g allowed · 4,772 yds)#73 (of 125 teams · 28.0 pts/g allowed · 336 points)#67 (of 125 teams · +1.2 /g · +14 on the season)#113 (of 125 teams · -9 on the season · 16 taken, 25 given · -0.75 /g)#64 (of 125 teams · 30:02 /g · 6h 00m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#74 (of 125 teams · 0.065 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#69 (of 125 teams · 0.082 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#103 (of 125 teams · 39% of plays successful)#25 (of 125 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#29 (of 125 teams · 0.993 average PPA on successful plays)#117 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 1.069 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Colorado4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#88 (of 125 teams · 369.9 yds/g · 4,439 yds)#87 (of 125 teams · 25.4 pts/g · 305 points)#108 (of 125 teams · 468.0 yds/g allowed · 5,616 yds)#114 (of 125 teams · 38.3 pts/g allowed · 459 points)#107 (of 125 teams · -12.8 /g · -154 on the season)#81 (of 125 teams · -3 on the season · 21 taken, 24 given · -0.25 /g)#98 (of 125 teams · 28:40 /g · 5h 44m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#118 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · -0.011 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#82 (of 125 teams · 0.094 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#86 (of 125 teams · 40% of plays successful)#79 (of 125 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#120 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 0.814 average PPA on successful plays)#81 (of 125 teams · 0.975 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013California1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#34 (of 125 teams · 453.6 yds/g · 5,443 yds)#97 (of 125 teams · 23.0 pts/g · 276 points)#124 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 529.6 yds/g allowed · 6,355 yds)#124 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 45.9 pts/g allowed · 551 points)#118 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · -22.9 /g · -275 on the season)#124 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · -15 on the season · 13 taken, 28 given · -1.25 /g)#93 (of 125 teams · 28:55 /g · 5h 47m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#88 (of 125 teams · 0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#94 (of 125 teams · 0.115 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#84 (of 125 teams · 40% of plays successful)#68 (of 125 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#12 (of 125 teams · 1.018 average PPA on successful plays)#106 (of 125 teams · 1.033 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Pac-12, 20132013 UCLAPac-12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #34
Total offense. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Oregon #2 of 125; 2013 Washington #13 of 125; 2013 Oregon State #26 of 125; 2013 Arizona #31 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #32 of 125; 2013 California #34 of 125; 2013 Washington State #54 of 125; 2013 Stanford #70 of 125; 2013 USC #73 of 125; 2013 Utah #77 of 125; 2013 Colorado #88 of 125. Marked: 2013 UCLA, ranked 38 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 34.
Scoring offensemedian #36
Scoring offense. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Oregon #4 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #10 of 125; 2013 Washington #18 of 125; 2013 Oregon State #29 of 125; 2013 Arizona #36 of 125; 2013 Stanford #45 of 125; 2013 Washington State #52 of 125; 2013 USC #60 of 125; 2013 Utah #66 of 125; 2013 Colorado #87 of 125; 2013 California #97 of 125. Marked: 2013 UCLA, ranked 20 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 36.
Total defensemedian #56
Total defense. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 USC #13 of 125; 2013 Stanford #16 of 125; 2013 Oregon #37 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #42 of 125; 2013 Washington #56 of 125; 2013 Utah #61 of 125; 2013 Arizona #63 of 125; 2013 Oregon State #101 of 125; 2013 Washington State #103 of 125; 2013 Colorado #108 of 125; 2013 California #124 of 125. Marked: 2013 UCLA, ranked 54 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 56.
Scoring defensemedian #39
Scoring defense. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Stanford #10 of 125; 2013 Oregon #13 of 125; 2013 USC #16 of 125; 2013 Washington #29 of 125; 2013 Arizona #39 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #64 of 125; 2013 Utah #73 of 125; 2013 Oregon State #91 of 125; 2013 Washington State #97 of 125; 2013 Colorado #114 of 125; 2013 California #124 of 125. Marked: 2013 UCLA, ranked 35 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 39.
Point marginmedian #35
Point margin. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Oregon #3 of 125; 2013 Washington #15 of 125; 2013 Stanford #25 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #27 of 125; 2013 Arizona #35 of 125; 2013 USC #37 of 125; 2013 Oregon State #61 of 125; 2013 Utah #67 of 125; 2013 Washington State #76 of 125; 2013 Colorado #107 of 125; 2013 California #118 of 125. Marked: 2013 UCLA, ranked 21 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 35.
Turnover marginmedian #39
Turnover margin. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Arizona State #7 of 125; 2013 Oregon #14 of 125; 2013 Washington #24 of 125; 2013 USC #36 of 125; 2013 Arizona #39 of 125; 2013 Oregon State #42 of 125; 2013 Stanford #61 of 125; 2013 Colorado #81 of 125; 2013 Washington State #93 of 125; 2013 Utah #113 of 125; 2013 California #124 of 125. Marked: 2013 UCLA, ranked 19 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 39.
Possessionmedian #76
Possession. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 USC #2 of 125; 2013 Oregon State #25 of 125; 2013 Stanford #37 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #56 of 125; 2013 Utah #64 of 125; 2013 Washington #83 of 125; 2013 Washington State #84 of 125; 2013 California #93 of 125; 2013 Colorado #98 of 125; 2013 Arizona #104 of 125; 2013 Oregon #122 of 125. Marked: 2013 UCLA, ranked 76 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 76.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 UCLA, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 UCLA, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 UCLA, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 UCLA, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #54
Offensive EPA. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Oregon #4 of 125; 2013 Washington #13 of 125; 2013 Oregon State #39 of 125; 2013 USC #53 of 125; 2013 Arizona #54 of 125; 2013 Stanford #59 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #64 of 125; 2013 Utah #74 of 125; 2013 Washington State #83 of 125; 2013 California #88 of 125; 2013 Colorado #118 of 125. Marked: 2013 UCLA, ranked 16 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 54.
Defensive EPAmedian #49
Defensive EPA. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 USC #11 of 125; 2013 Oregon #14 of 125; 2013 Arizona #26 of 125; 2013 Washington #27 of 125; 2013 Stanford #40 of 125; 2013 Washington State #49 of 125; 2013 Utah #69 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #77 of 125; 2013 Colorado #82 of 125; 2013 California #94 of 125; 2013 Oregon State #102 of 125. Marked: 2013 UCLA, ranked 91 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 49.
Offensive success ratemedian #41
Offensive success rate. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Oregon #6 of 125; 2013 Oregon State #23 of 125; 2013 Arizona #33 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #38 of 125; 2013 Washington #41 of 125; 2013 Stanford #58 of 125; 2013 Washington State #67 of 125; 2013 USC #78 of 125; 2013 California #84 of 125; 2013 Colorado #86 of 125; 2013 Utah #103 of 125. Marked: 2013 UCLA, ranked 37 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 41.
Defensive success ratemedian #39
Defensive success rate. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 USC #13 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #23 of 125; 2013 Utah #25 of 125; 2013 Oregon #31 of 125; 2013 Stanford #38 of 125; 2013 Arizona #39 of 125; 2013 Washington #41 of 125; 2013 California #68 of 125; 2013 Colorado #79 of 125; 2013 Washington State #89 of 125; 2013 Oregon State #90 of 125. Marked: 2013 UCLA, ranked 93 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 39.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #27
Offensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Washington #5 of 125; 2013 California #12 of 125; 2013 Oregon #19 of 125; 2013 Washington State #21 of 125; 2013 USC #24 of 125; 2013 Oregon State #27 of 125; 2013 Utah #29 of 125; 2013 Stanford #88 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #89 of 125; 2013 Arizona #116 of 125; 2013 Colorado #120 of 125. Marked: 2013 UCLA, ranked 57 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 27.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #63
Defensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Oregon #9 of 125; 2013 Washington State #12 of 125; 2013 Washington #35 of 125; 2013 Arizona #56 of 125; 2013 Oregon State #63 of 125; 2013 USC #65 of 125; 2013 Colorado #81 of 125; 2013 Stanford #97 of 125; 2013 California #106 of 125; 2013 Utah #117 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #119 of 125. Marked: 2013 UCLA, ranked 21 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 63.