UT Martin game log
2023: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.
Game log
Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.
Success by play
Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: UT Martin on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is UT Martin's defense in the mirror.
Down
Play
Min to go
Player
Season, current filters:UT Martin offense 41% (295 of 720)Opponent offense / UT Martin defense 34% (223 of 665)
SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps
No player qualifies under these filters.
at #4 Georgia
7–48 L · 63 plays to 70UT Martin offense 29% (18/63)Georgia offense 47% (33/70)
UT Martin offense
29%
18 of 63 plays
Play #
Georgia offenseUT Martin defense
47%
33 of 70 plays
vs Missouri State
38–31 W · 72 plays to 82UT Martin offense 51% (37/72)Missouri State offense 39% (32/82)
UT Martin offense
51%
37 of 72 plays
Play #
Missouri State offenseUT Martin defense
39%
32 of 82 plays
vs Houston Christian
66–7 W · 83 plays to 53UT Martin offense 57% (47/83)HCU offense 19% (10/53)
UT Martin offense
57%
47 of 83 plays
Play #
HCU offenseUT Martin defense
19%
10 of 53 plays
at North Alabama
37–21 W · 79 plays to 87UT Martin offense 39% (31/79)North Alabama offense 38% (33/87)
UT Martin offense
39%
31 of 79 plays
Play #
North Alabama offenseUT Martin defense
38%
33 of 87 plays
vs Tennessee State
20–10 W · 69 plays to 62UT Martin offense 45% (31/69)Tennessee State offense 27% (17/62)
UT Martin offense
45%
31 of 69 plays
Play #
Tennessee State offenseUT Martin defense
27%
17 of 62 plays
at Eastern Illinois
28–27 W · 63 plays to 60UT Martin offense 30% (19/63)Eastern Illinois offense 32% (19/60)
UT Martin offense
30%
19 of 63 plays
Play #
Eastern Illinois offenseUT Martin defense
32%
19 of 60 plays
vs Charleston Southern
17–0 W · 80 plays to 57UT Martin offense 35% (28/80)Charleston S. offense 30% (17/57)
UT Martin offense
35%
28 of 80 plays
Play #
Charleston S. offenseUT Martin defense
30%
17 of 57 plays
at Tennessee Tech
44–41 W · 69 plays to 80UT Martin offense 41% (28/69)Tennessee Tech offense 33% (26/80)
UT Martin offense
41%
28 of 69 plays
Play #
Tennessee Tech offenseUT Martin defense
33%
26 of 80 plays
vs Southeast Missouri State
41–14 W · 74 plays to 43UT Martin offense 41% (30/74)SE. Missouri St. offense 23% (10/43)
UT Martin offense
41%
30 of 74 plays
Play #
SE. Missouri St. offenseUT Martin defense
23%
10 of 43 plays
at Samford
17–27 L · 68 plays to 71UT Martin offense 38% (26/68)Samford offense 37% (26/71)
UT Martin offense
38%
26 of 68 plays
Play #
Samford offenseUT Martin defense
37%
26 of 71 plays