THIRD AND DATA

UT Martin game log

2023: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Sep 2at #4 Georgia7–48 L622624.229–13418–33–128152–141–1110–7229:3529%47%
Sep 9vs Missouri State38–31 W745126.941–40514–33–107247–140–105–3526:0351%39%
Sep 16vs Houston Christian66–7 W847088.448–27127–36–437329–153–315–4038:2257%19%
Sep 23at North Alabama37–21 W814805.951–30813–30–172218–172–326–5530:3839%38%
Sep 30vs Tennessee State20–10 W714866.846–25616–25–230255–120–116–6035:3545%27%
Oct 7at Eastern Illinois28–27 W623175.132–14614–30–171146–140–039–9025:0230%32%
Oct 21vs Charleston Southern17–0 W763104.148–19412–28–116197–193–401–1532:3335%30%
Oct 28at Gardner-Webb34–38 L633445.526–11820–37–226178–150–028–6926:21——
Nov 4at Tennessee Tech44–41 W694196.128–10124–41–318224–153–434–3527:5841%33%
Nov 11vs Southeast Missouri State41–14 W755337.146–31616–29–2172411–192–226–4337:5441%23%
Nov 18at Samford17–27 L694456.431–18423–38–261212–133–4411–10430:4038%37%
Season11 games8–37864,8166.1426–2433197–360–2,38323469–16717–231971–6185:40:4141%34%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: UT Martin on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is UT Martin's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:UT Martin offense 41% (295 of 720)Opponent offense / UT Martin defense 34% (223 of 665)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%#4 Georgia: opponent offense 47% of 70#4 Georgia: UT Martin offense 29% of 63Missouri State: opponent offense 39% of 82Missouri State: UT Martin offense 51% of 72Houston Christian: opponent offense 19% of 53Houston Christian: UT Martin offense 57% of 83North Alabama: opponent offense 38% of 87North Alabama: UT Martin offense 39% of 79Tennessee State: opponent offense 27% of 62Tennessee State: UT Martin offense 45% of 69Eastern Illinois: opponent offense 32% of 60Eastern Illinois: UT Martin offense 30% of 63Charleston Southern: opponent offense 30% of 57Charleston Southern: UT Martin offense 35% of 80Tennessee Tech: opponent offense 33% of 80Tennessee Tech: UT Martin offense 41% of 69Southeast Missouri State: opponent offense 23% of 43Southeast Missouri State: UT Martin offense 41% of 74Samford: opponent offense 37% of 71Samford: UT Martin offense 38% of 68
UT Martin offenseOpponent offense (UT Martin defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

at #4 Georgia

7–48 L · 63 plays to 70
UT Martin offense 29% (18/63)Georgia offense 47% (33/70)

vs Missouri State

38–31 W · 72 plays to 82
UT Martin offense 51% (37/72)Missouri State offense 39% (32/82)

vs Houston Christian

66–7 W · 83 plays to 53
UT Martin offense 57% (47/83)HCU offense 19% (10/53)

at North Alabama

37–21 W · 79 plays to 87
UT Martin offense 39% (31/79)North Alabama offense 38% (33/87)

vs Tennessee State

20–10 W · 69 plays to 62
UT Martin offense 45% (31/69)Tennessee State offense 27% (17/62)

at Eastern Illinois

28–27 W · 63 plays to 60
UT Martin offense 30% (19/63)Eastern Illinois offense 32% (19/60)

vs Charleston Southern

17–0 W · 80 plays to 57
UT Martin offense 35% (28/80)Charleston S. offense 30% (17/57)

at Tennessee Tech

44–41 W · 69 plays to 80
UT Martin offense 41% (28/69)Tennessee Tech offense 33% (26/80)

vs Southeast Missouri State

41–14 W · 74 plays to 43
UT Martin offense 41% (30/74)SE. Missouri St. offense 23% (10/43)

at Samford

17–27 L · 68 plays to 71
UT Martin offense 38% (26/68)Samford offense 37% (26/71)