THIRD AND DATA

UT Martin game log

2024: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 31at Kansas State6–41 L551342.438–3610–17–9886–170–004–2533:3020%57%
Sep 7at Southeast Missouri State42–45 L764706.243–19323–33–277223–132–2112–10438:1341%34%
Sep 14vs North Alabama43–28 W744165.639–19318–35–223213–151–228–7032:1242%34%
Sep 21vs Missouri State24–31 L633084.935–9520–28–213193–123–427–3329:5437%39%
Sep 28at Kennesaw State24–13 W582925.035–16013–23–132167–161–112–1031:1146%29%
Oct 5vs Gardner-Webb35–17 W644026.339–23515–25–1672110–161–209–6930:3944%33%
Oct 12at Western Illinois45–17 W695417.841–30620–28–235275–101–224–4432:0351%36%
Oct 26vs Eastern Illinois52–17 W534608.730–21216–23–248205–90–105–3527:4451%54%
Nov 2at Tennessee State28–21 W583706.431–10418–27–266225–120–016–5630:3546%50%
Nov 9at Charleston Southern40–14 W644917.738–23713–26–254218–151–138–8333:3741%28%
Nov 16vs Tennessee Tech9–10 L601692.830–3912–30–13083–170–122–1626:3219%24%
Nov 23vs Lindenwood33–26 W351945.517–7810–18–11695–90–124–3816:3629%39%
Nov 30at New Hampshire41–10 W483437.128–15612–20–187148–131–104–2722:4447%10%
Dec 7at Montana State17–49 L662644.035–9216–31–172117–191–207–6230:3736%53%
Season14 games9–58434,8545.8479–2136216–364–2,71823978–19312–201682–6726:56:0740%39%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: UT Martin on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is UT Martin's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:UT Martin offense 40% (327 of 824)Opponent offense / UT Martin defense 39% (320 of 826)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Kansas State: opponent offense 57% of 56Kansas State: UT Martin offense 20% of 55Southeast Missouri State: opponent offense 34% of 64Southeast Missouri State: UT Martin offense 41% of 71North Alabama: opponent offense 34% of 68North Alabama: UT Martin offense 42% of 73Missouri State: opponent offense 39% of 57Missouri State: UT Martin offense 37% of 62Kennesaw State: opponent offense 29% of 65Kennesaw State: UT Martin offense 46% of 57Gardner-Webb: opponent offense 33% of 57Gardner-Webb: UT Martin offense 44% of 62Western Illinois: opponent offense 36% of 73Western Illinois: UT Martin offense 51% of 70Eastern Illinois: opponent offense 54% of 74Eastern Illinois: UT Martin offense 51% of 51Tennessee State: opponent offense 50% of 72Tennessee State: UT Martin offense 46% of 56Charleston Southern: opponent offense 28% of 53Charleston Southern: UT Martin offense 41% of 59Tennessee Tech: opponent offense 24% of 59Tennessee Tech: UT Martin offense 19% of 59Lindenwood: opponent offense 39% of 51Lindenwood: UT Martin offense 29% of 34New Hampshire: opponent offense 10% of 20New Hampshire: UT Martin offense 47% of 49Montana State: opponent offense 53% of 57Montana State: UT Martin offense 36% of 66
@ Kansas State@ Southeast Missouri StateNorth AlabamaMissouri State@ Kennesaw StateGardner-Webb@ Western IllinoisEastern Illinois@ Tennessee State@ Charleston SouthernTennessee TechLindenwood@ New Hampshire@ Montana State
UT Martin offenseOpponent offense (UT Martin defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

at Kansas State

6–41 L · 55 plays to 56
UT Martin offense 20% (11/55)Kansas State offense 57% (32/56)

at Southeast Missouri State

42–45 L · 71 plays to 64
UT Martin offense 41% (29/71)SE. Missouri St. offense 34% (22/64)

vs North Alabama

43–28 W · 73 plays to 68
UT Martin offense 42% (31/73)North Alabama offense 34% (23/68)

vs Missouri State

24–31 L · 62 plays to 57
UT Martin offense 37% (23/62)Missouri State offense 39% (22/57)

at Kennesaw State

24–13 W · 57 plays to 65
UT Martin offense 46% (26/57)Kennesaw State offense 29% (19/65)

vs Gardner-Webb

35–17 W · 62 plays to 57
UT Martin offense 44% (27/62)Gardner-Webb offense 33% (19/57)

at Western Illinois

45–17 W · 70 plays to 73
UT Martin offense 51% (36/70)Western Illinois offense 36% (26/73)

vs Eastern Illinois

52–17 W · 51 plays to 74
UT Martin offense 51% (26/51)Eastern Illinois offense 54% (40/74)

at Tennessee State

28–21 W · 56 plays to 72
UT Martin offense 46% (26/56)Tennessee State offense 50% (36/72)

at Charleston Southern

40–14 W · 59 plays to 53
UT Martin offense 41% (24/59)Charleston S. offense 28% (15/53)

vs Tennessee Tech

9–10 L · 59 plays to 59
UT Martin offense 19% (11/59)Tennessee Tech offense 24% (14/59)

vs Lindenwood

33–26 W · 34 plays to 51
UT Martin offense 29% (10/34)Lindenwood offense 39% (20/51)

at New Hampshire

41–10 W · 49 plays to 20
UT Martin offense 47% (23/49)New Hampshire offense 10% (2/20)

at Montana State

17–49 L · 66 plays to 57
UT Martin offense 36% (24/66)Montana State offense 53% (30/57)