Metrics

Washington StateCougars

Season
Current

Pac-10

Pac-10, 2005

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2005Washington State470 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#26 (of 119 teams · 422.1 yds/g · 4,643 yards)#21 (of 119 teams · 33.5 pts/g · 368 points)#35 (of 119 teams · 334.6 yds/g allowed · 3,680 yards)#99 (of 119 teams · 31.4 pts/g allowed · 346 points)#54 (of 119 teams · +2.0 /g · +22 on the season)#82 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 15 taken, 19 given · -0.36 /g)#117 (of 119 teams · 13:45 /g · 2h 31m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 119 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#93 (of 119 teams · 0.115 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#54 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#84 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#40 (of 119 teams · 1.032 average PPA on successful plays)#66 (of 119 teams · 1.006 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Pac-10 teams in 20050 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#26 (Total offense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range #1–#100. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#21 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range #2–#91. 3 of 10 in the top 10.)#89 (Total defense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range #6–#116. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#87 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range #26–#110. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#42 (Point margin: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range #2–#96. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#32 (Turnover margin: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range #2–#115. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#64 (Possession: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range #10–#117. 1 of 10 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#28 (Offensive EPA: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range #1–#92. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#74 (Defensive EPA: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range #2–#117. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#54 (Offensive success rate: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range #1–#102. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#72 (Defensive success rate: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range #2–#107. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#30 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range #2–#45. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#76 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range #37–#115. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)
2005Arizona380 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#71 (of 119 teams · 351.3 yds/g · 3,864 yards)#81 (of 119 teams · 22.9 pts/g · 252 points)#92 (of 119 teams · 408.8 yds/g allowed · 4,497 yards)#64 (of 119 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 290 points)#80 (of 119 teams · -3.5 /g · -38 on the season)#111 (of 119 teams · -12 on the season · 19 taken, 31 given · -1.09 /g)#49 (of 119 teams · 18:13 /g · 3h 20m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 119 teams · 0.072 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#74 (of 119 teams · 0.081 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#68 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#81 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#11 (of 119 teams · 1.121 average PPA on successful plays)#59 (of 119 teams · 0.999 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Arizona State750 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 519.1 yds/g · 6,229 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 36.8 pts/g · 442 points)#116 (of 119 teams · 468.8 yds/g allowed · 5,625 yards)#87 (of 119 teams · 29.9 pts/g allowed · 359 points)#33 (of 119 teams · +6.9 /g · +83 on the season)#30 (of 119 teams · +6 on the season · 28 taken, 22 given · +0.50 /g)#64 (of 119 teams · 17:49 /g · 3h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.196 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#92 (of 119 teams · 0.113 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#11 (of 119 teams · 46% of plays successful)#91 (of 119 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#16 (of 119 teams · 1.096 average PPA on successful plays)#76 (of 119 teams · 1.025 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005California840 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#22 (of 119 teams · 427.9 yds/g · 5,135 yards)#25 (of 119 teams · 32.9 pts/g · 395 points)#55 (of 119 teams · 359.6 yds/g allowed · 4,315 yards)#26 (of 119 teams · 21.2 pts/g allowed · 254 points)#17 (of 119 teams · +11.8 /g · +141 on the season)#91 (of 119 teams · -6 on the season · 22 taken, 28 given · -0.50 /g)#53 (of 119 teams · 18:05 /g · 3h 37m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 119 teams · 0.139 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#65 (of 119 teams · 0.071 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#40 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#40 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#20 (of 119 teams · 1.081 average PPA on successful plays)#110 (of 119 teams · 1.113 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Oregon1020 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#60 (of 119 teams · 360.8 yds/g · 4,330 yards)#12 (of 119 teams · 34.5 pts/g · 414 points)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 275.3 yds/g allowed · 3,303 yards)#38 (of 119 teams · 23.2 pts/g allowed · 278 points)#19 (of 119 teams · +11.3 /g · +136 on the season)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +14 on the season · 30 taken, 16 given · +1.17 /g)#115 (of 119 teams · 14:57 /g · 2h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#87 (of 119 teams · 0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#84 (of 119 teams · 36% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#36 (of 119 teams · 1.036 average PPA on successful plays)#104 (of 119 teams · 1.088 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Oregon State560 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#28 (of 119 teams · 419.0 yds/g · 4,609 yards)#60 (of 119 teams · 26.6 pts/g · 293 points)#89 (of 119 teams · 406.7 yds/g allowed · 4,474 yards)#107 (of 119 teams · 33.2 pts/g allowed · 365 points)#90 (of 119 teams · -6.5 /g · -72 on the season)#115 (of 119 teams · -15 on the season · 24 taken, 39 given · -1.36 /g)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:35 /g · 3h 35m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 119 teams · 0.073 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#56 (of 119 teams · 0.058 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#74 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#22 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#30 (of 119 teams · 1.057 average PPA on successful plays)#115 (of 119 teams · 1.151 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Stanford560 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#100 (of 119 teams · 316.2 yds/g · 3,478 yards)#71 (of 119 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 269 points)#111 (of 119 teams · 446.2 yds/g allowed · 4,908 yards)#90 (of 119 teams · 30.6 pts/g allowed · 337 points)#89 (of 119 teams · -6.2 /g · -68 on the season)#32 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 23 taken, 18 given · +0.45 /g)#47 (of 119 teams · 18:14 /g · 3h 21m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 119 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#117 (of 119 teams · 0.172 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#59 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#72 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#37 (of 119 teams · 1.035 average PPA on successful plays)#103 (of 119 teams · 1.085 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005UCLA1020 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#19 (of 119 teams · 431.0 yds/g · 5,172 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 39.1 pts/g · 469 points)#115 (of 119 teams · 468.1 yds/g allowed · 5,617 yards)#110 (of 119 teams · 34.2 pts/g allowed · 410 points)#42 (of 119 teams · +4.9 /g · +59 on the season)#26 (of 119 teams · +7 on the season · 24 taken, 17 given · +0.58 /g)#99 (of 119 teams · 16:20 /g · 3h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 119 teams · 0.110 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#114 (of 119 teams · 0.168 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#37 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#107 (of 119 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#35 (of 119 teams · 1.041 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 119 teams · 1.006 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005USC1211 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 522.5 yds/g · 6,792 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 49.1 pts/g · 638 points)#40 (of 119 teams · 339.1 yds/g allowed · 4,408 yards)#35 (of 119 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 297 points)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +26.2 /g · +341 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +22 on the season · 37 taken, 15 given · +1.69 /g)#100 (of 119 teams · 16:17 /g · 3h 32m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.244 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#89 (of 119 teams · 0.105 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 50% of plays successful)#82 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#45 (of 119 teams · 1.024 average PPA on successful plays)#85 (of 119 teams · 1.041 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Washington290 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#65 (of 119 teams · 358.0 yds/g · 3,938 yards)#91 (of 119 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 237 points)#99 (of 119 teams · 419.1 yds/g allowed · 4,610 yards)#90 (of 119 teams · 30.6 pts/g allowed · 337 points)#96 (of 119 teams · -9.1 /g · -100 on the season)#82 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 18 taken, 22 given · -0.36 /g)#87 (of 119 teams · 16:56 /g · 3h 06m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#92 (of 119 teams · 0.009 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#61 (of 119 teams · 0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#102 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#62 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.213 average PPA on successful plays)#37 (of 119 teams · 0.966 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Pac-10, 20052005 Washington StatePac-10 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #26
Total offense. Pac-10, 2005, best rank first: 2005 USC #1 of 119; 2005 Arizona State #2 of 119; 2005 UCLA #19 of 119; 2005 California #22 of 119; 2005 Oregon State #28 of 119; 2005 Oregon #60 of 119; 2005 Washington #65 of 119; 2005 Arizona #71 of 119; 2005 Stanford #100 of 119. Marked: 2005 Washington State, ranked 26 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 26.
Scoring offensemedian #21
Scoring offense. Pac-10, 2005, best rank first: 2005 USC #2 of 119; 2005 UCLA #5 of 119; 2005 Arizona State #7 of 119; 2005 Oregon #12 of 119; 2005 California #25 of 119; 2005 Oregon State #60 of 119; 2005 Stanford #71 of 119; 2005 Arizona #81 of 119; 2005 Washington #91 of 119. Marked: 2005 Washington State, ranked 21 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 21.
Total defensemedian #89
Total defense. Pac-10, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Oregon #6 of 119; 2005 USC #40 of 119; 2005 California #55 of 119; 2005 Oregon State #89 of 119; 2005 Arizona #92 of 119; 2005 Washington #99 of 119; 2005 Stanford #111 of 119; 2005 UCLA #115 of 119; 2005 Arizona State #116 of 119. Marked: 2005 Washington State, ranked 35 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 89.
Scoring defensemedian #87
Scoring defense. Pac-10, 2005, best rank first: 2005 California #26 of 119; 2005 USC #35 of 119; 2005 Oregon #38 of 119; 2005 Arizona #64 of 119; 2005 Arizona State #87 of 119; 2005 Stanford #90 of 119; 2005 Washington #90 of 119; 2005 Oregon State #107 of 119; 2005 UCLA #110 of 119. Marked: 2005 Washington State, ranked 99 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 87.
Point marginmedian #42
Point margin. Pac-10, 2005, best rank first: 2005 USC #2 of 119; 2005 California #17 of 119; 2005 Oregon #19 of 119; 2005 Arizona State #33 of 119; 2005 UCLA #42 of 119; 2005 Arizona #80 of 119; 2005 Stanford #89 of 119; 2005 Oregon State #90 of 119; 2005 Washington #96 of 119. Marked: 2005 Washington State, ranked 54 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 42.
Turnover marginmedian #32
Turnover margin. Pac-10, 2005, best rank first: 2005 USC #2 of 119; 2005 Oregon #8 of 119; 2005 UCLA #26 of 119; 2005 Arizona State #30 of 119; 2005 Stanford #32 of 119; 2005 Washington #82 of 119; 2005 California #91 of 119; 2005 Arizona #111 of 119; 2005 Oregon State #115 of 119. Marked: 2005 Washington State, ranked 82 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 32.
Possessionmedian #64
Possession. Pac-10, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Oregon State #10 of 119; 2005 Stanford #47 of 119; 2005 Arizona #49 of 119; 2005 California #53 of 119; 2005 Arizona State #64 of 119; 2005 Washington #87 of 119; 2005 UCLA #99 of 119; 2005 USC #100 of 119; 2005 Oregon #115 of 119. Marked: 2005 Washington State, ranked 117 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 64.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Pac-10, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Washington State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Pac-10, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Washington State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Pac-10, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Washington State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Pac-10, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Washington State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #28
Offensive EPA. Pac-10, 2005, best rank first: 2005 USC #1 of 119; 2005 Arizona State #3 of 119; 2005 California #14 of 119; 2005 UCLA #28 of 119; 2005 Oregon State #48 of 119; 2005 Arizona #50 of 119; 2005 Stanford #60 of 119; 2005 Oregon #87 of 119; 2005 Washington #92 of 119. Marked: 2005 Washington State, ranked 27 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 28.
Defensive EPAmedian #74
Defensive EPA. Pac-10, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Oregon #2 of 119; 2005 Oregon State #56 of 119; 2005 Washington #61 of 119; 2005 California #65 of 119; 2005 Arizona #74 of 119; 2005 USC #89 of 119; 2005 Arizona State #92 of 119; 2005 UCLA #114 of 119; 2005 Stanford #117 of 119. Marked: 2005 Washington State, ranked 93 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 74.
Offensive success ratemedian #54
Offensive success rate. Pac-10, 2005, best rank first: 2005 USC #1 of 119; 2005 Arizona State #11 of 119; 2005 UCLA #37 of 119; 2005 California #40 of 119; 2005 Stanford #59 of 119; 2005 Arizona #68 of 119; 2005 Oregon State #74 of 119; 2005 Oregon #84 of 119; 2005 Washington #102 of 119. Marked: 2005 Washington State, ranked 54 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 54.
Defensive success ratemedian #72
Defensive success rate. Pac-10, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Oregon #2 of 119; 2005 Oregon State #22 of 119; 2005 California #40 of 119; 2005 Washington #62 of 119; 2005 Stanford #72 of 119; 2005 Arizona #81 of 119; 2005 USC #82 of 119; 2005 Arizona State #91 of 119; 2005 UCLA #107 of 119. Marked: 2005 Washington State, ranked 84 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 72.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #30
Offensive explosiveness. Pac-10, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Washington #2 of 119; 2005 Arizona #11 of 119; 2005 Arizona State #16 of 119; 2005 California #20 of 119; 2005 Oregon State #30 of 119; 2005 UCLA #35 of 119; 2005 Oregon #36 of 119; 2005 Stanford #37 of 119; 2005 USC #45 of 119. Marked: 2005 Washington State, ranked 40 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 30.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #76
Defensive explosiveness. Pac-10, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Washington #37 of 119; 2005 Arizona #59 of 119; 2005 UCLA #65 of 119; 2005 Arizona State #76 of 119; 2005 USC #85 of 119; 2005 Stanford #103 of 119; 2005 Oregon #104 of 119; 2005 California #110 of 119; 2005 Oregon State #115 of 119. Marked: 2005 Washington State, ranked 66 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 76.