Metrics

Washington StateCougars

Season
Current

Pac-10

Pac-10, 2006

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2006Washington State660 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#23 (of 119 teams · 388.1 yds/g · 4,657 yards)#57 (of 119 teams · 24.6 pts/g · 295 points)#85 (of 119 teams · 357.2 yds/g allowed · 4,286 yards)#62 (of 119 teams · 23.1 pts/g allowed · 277 points)#58 (of 119 teams · +1.5 /g · +18 on the season)#26 (of 119 teams · +6 on the season · 30 taken, 24 given · +0.50 /g)#63 (of 119 teams · 18:05 /g · 3h 37m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 119 teams · 0.108 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#58 (of 119 teams · 0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#64 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#58 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.081 average PPA on successful plays)#91 (of 119 teams · 0.995 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Pac-10 teams in 20060 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#40 (Total offense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range #7–#118. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#42 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range #11–#118. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#54 (Total defense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range #24–#99. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#54 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range #11–#108. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#53 (Point margin: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range #14–#116. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#36 (Turnover margin: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range #14–#115. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#75 (Possession: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range #34–#102. 0 of 10 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#33 (Offensive EPA: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range #15–#111. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#47 (Defensive EPA: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range #26–#111. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#37 (Offensive success rate: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range #4–#112. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#41 (Defensive success rate: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range #23–#115. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#70 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range #9–#111. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#58 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range #17–#113. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)
2006Arizona660 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#113 (of 119 teams · 252.8 yds/g · 3,034 yards)#105 (of 119 teams · 16.6 pts/g · 199 points)#53 (of 119 teams · 326.3 yds/g allowed · 3,915 yards)#35 (of 119 teams · 19.6 pts/g allowed · 235 points)#77 (of 119 teams · -3.0 /g · -36 on the season)#14 (of 119 teams · +10 on the season · 28 taken, 18 given · +0.83 /g)#36 (of 119 teams · 18:45 /g · 3h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#105 (of 119 teams · -0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#52 (of 119 teams · 0.030 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#112 (of 119 teams · 32% of plays successful)#65 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#21 (of 119 teams · 1.025 average PPA on successful plays)#41 (of 119 teams · 0.896 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Arizona State760 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#40 (of 119 teams · 367.3 yds/g · 4,775 yards)#42 (of 119 teams · 26.8 pts/g · 348 points)#54 (of 119 teams · 327.5 yds/g allowed · 4,257 yards)#76 (of 119 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 326 points)#56 (of 119 teams · +1.7 /g · +22 on the season)#61 (of 119 teams · +0 on the season · 27 taken, 27 given · +0.00 /g)#88 (of 119 teams · 17:43 /g · 3h 50m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 119 teams · 0.064 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#44 (of 119 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#37 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#28 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#70 (of 119 teams · 0.918 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 119 teams · 0.962 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006California1031 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 416.0 yds/g · 5,408 yards)#11 (of 119 teams · 32.9 pts/g · 427 points)#95 (of 119 teams · 366.2 yds/g allowed · 4,761 yards)#32 (of 119 teams · 19.3 pts/g allowed · 251 points)#16 (of 119 teams · +13.5 /g · +176 on the season)#36 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 29 taken, 24 given · +0.38 /g)#87 (of 119 teams · 17:44 /g · 3h 50m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 119 teams · 0.119 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 119 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#53 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#12 (of 119 teams · 1.057 average PPA on successful plays)#57 (of 119 teams · 0.936 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Oregon760 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 422.9 yds/g · 5,497 yards)#25 (of 119 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 383 points)#48 (of 119 teams · 322.1 yds/g allowed · 4,187 yards)#89 (of 119 teams · 26.5 pts/g allowed · 345 points)#53 (of 119 teams · +2.9 /g · +38 on the season)#101 (of 119 teams · -9 on the season · 23 taken, 32 given · -0.69 /g)#93 (of 119 teams · 17:30 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 119 teams · 0.098 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#36 (of 119 teams · 0.015 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 48% of plays successful)#29 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#97 (of 119 teams · 0.868 average PPA on successful plays)#58 (of 119 teams · 0.937 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Oregon State1040 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#43 (of 119 teams · 360.6 yds/g · 5,048 yards)#36 (of 119 teams · 27.8 pts/g · 389 points)#62 (of 119 teams · 333.9 yds/g allowed · 4,674 yards)#54 (of 119 teams · 22.2 pts/g allowed · 311 points)#44 (of 119 teams · +5.6 /g · +78 on the season)#41 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 35 taken, 30 given · +0.36 /g)#53 (of 119 teams · 18:15 /g · 4h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 119 teams · 0.072 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#42 (of 119 teams · 0.023 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#36 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#41 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#86 (of 119 teams · 0.899 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 119 teams · 0.979 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Stanford1110 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#118 (of 119 teams · 231.9 yds/g · 2,783 yards)#118 (of 119 teams · 10.6 pts/g · 127 points)#99 (of 119 teams · 387.5 yds/g allowed · 4,650 yards)#108 (of 119 teams · 31.4 pts/g allowed · 377 points)#116 (of 119 teams · -20.8 /g · -250 on the season)#115 (of 119 teams · -16 on the season · 15 taken, 31 given · -1.33 /g)#102 (of 119 teams · 17:13 /g · 3h 27m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#103 (of 119 teams · -0.042 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#111 (of 119 teams · 0.143 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#85 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#115 (of 119 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#89 (of 119 teams · 0.895 average PPA on successful plays)#17 (of 119 teams · 0.844 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006UCLA760 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#68 (of 119 teams · 330.1 yds/g · 4,291 yards)#64 (of 119 teams · 23.0 pts/g · 299 points)#39 (of 119 teams · 314.5 yds/g allowed · 4,088 yards)#39 (of 119 teams · 19.9 pts/g allowed · 259 points)#51 (of 119 teams · +3.1 /g · +40 on the season)#22 (of 119 teams · +8 on the season · 33 taken, 25 given · +0.62 /g)#34 (of 119 teams · 18:46 /g · 4h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#92 (of 119 teams · -0.004 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#26 (of 119 teams · 0.003 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#69 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#37 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#111 (of 119 teams · 0.813 average PPA on successful plays)#61 (of 119 teams · 0.943 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006USC1122 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#19 (of 119 teams · 391.9 yds/g · 5,094 yards)#18 (of 119 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 396 points)#24 (of 119 teams · 295.9 yds/g allowed · 3,846 yards)#11 (of 119 teams · 15.2 pts/g allowed · 197 points)#14 (of 119 teams · +15.3 /g · +199 on the season)#36 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 24 taken, 19 given · +0.38 /g)#75 (of 119 teams · 17:54 /g · 3h 53m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 119 teams · 0.107 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#48 (of 119 teams · 0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#30 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#23 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 119 teams · 1.007 average PPA on successful plays)#113 (of 119 teams · 1.071 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Washington570 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#73 (of 119 teams · 321.8 yds/g · 3,861 yards)#76 (of 119 teams · 21.8 pts/g · 262 points)#98 (of 119 teams · 379.8 yds/g allowed · 4,557 yards)#85 (of 119 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 311 points)#82 (of 119 teams · -4.1 /g · -49 on the season)#102 (of 119 teams · -9 on the season · 15 taken, 24 given · -0.75 /g)#80 (of 119 teams · 17:50 /g · 3h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#111 (of 119 teams · -0.054 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#97 (of 119 teams · 0.096 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#102 (of 119 teams · 36% of plays successful)#92 (of 119 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#103 (of 119 teams · 0.858 average PPA on successful plays)#20 (of 119 teams · 0.850 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Pac-10, 20062006 Washington StatePac-10 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #40
Total offense. Pac-10, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Oregon #7 of 119; 2006 California #9 of 119; 2006 USC #19 of 119; 2006 Arizona State #40 of 119; 2006 Oregon State #43 of 119; 2006 UCLA #68 of 119; 2006 Washington #73 of 119; 2006 Arizona #113 of 119; 2006 Stanford #118 of 119. Marked: 2006 Washington State, ranked 23 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 40.
Scoring offensemedian #42
Scoring offense. Pac-10, 2006, best rank first: 2006 California #11 of 119; 2006 USC #18 of 119; 2006 Oregon #25 of 119; 2006 Oregon State #36 of 119; 2006 Arizona State #42 of 119; 2006 UCLA #64 of 119; 2006 Washington #76 of 119; 2006 Arizona #105 of 119; 2006 Stanford #118 of 119. Marked: 2006 Washington State, ranked 57 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 42.
Total defensemedian #54
Total defense. Pac-10, 2006, best rank first: 2006 USC #24 of 119; 2006 UCLA #39 of 119; 2006 Oregon #48 of 119; 2006 Arizona #53 of 119; 2006 Arizona State #54 of 119; 2006 Oregon State #62 of 119; 2006 California #95 of 119; 2006 Washington #98 of 119; 2006 Stanford #99 of 119. Marked: 2006 Washington State, ranked 85 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 54.
Scoring defensemedian #54
Scoring defense. Pac-10, 2006, best rank first: 2006 USC #11 of 119; 2006 California #32 of 119; 2006 Arizona #35 of 119; 2006 UCLA #39 of 119; 2006 Oregon State #54 of 119; 2006 Arizona State #76 of 119; 2006 Washington #85 of 119; 2006 Oregon #89 of 119; 2006 Stanford #108 of 119. Marked: 2006 Washington State, ranked 62 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 54.
Point marginmedian #53
Point margin. Pac-10, 2006, best rank first: 2006 USC #14 of 119; 2006 California #16 of 119; 2006 Oregon State #44 of 119; 2006 UCLA #51 of 119; 2006 Oregon #53 of 119; 2006 Arizona State #56 of 119; 2006 Arizona #77 of 119; 2006 Washington #82 of 119; 2006 Stanford #116 of 119. Marked: 2006 Washington State, ranked 58 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 53.
Turnover marginmedian #36
Turnover margin. Pac-10, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Arizona #14 of 119; 2006 UCLA #22 of 119; 2006 California #36 of 119; 2006 USC #36 of 119; 2006 Oregon State #41 of 119; 2006 Arizona State #61 of 119; 2006 Oregon #101 of 119; 2006 Washington #102 of 119; 2006 Stanford #115 of 119. Marked: 2006 Washington State, ranked 26 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 36.
Possessionmedian #75
Possession. Pac-10, 2006, best rank first: 2006 UCLA #34 of 119; 2006 Arizona #36 of 119; 2006 Oregon State #53 of 119; 2006 USC #75 of 119; 2006 Washington #80 of 119; 2006 California #87 of 119; 2006 Arizona State #88 of 119; 2006 Oregon #93 of 119; 2006 Stanford #102 of 119. Marked: 2006 Washington State, ranked 63 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 75.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Pac-10, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Washington State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Pac-10, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Washington State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Pac-10, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Washington State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Pac-10, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Washington State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #33
Offensive EPA. Pac-10, 2006, best rank first: 2006 California #15 of 119; 2006 USC #19 of 119; 2006 Oregon #22 of 119; 2006 Oregon State #33 of 119; 2006 Arizona State #38 of 119; 2006 UCLA #92 of 119; 2006 Stanford #103 of 119; 2006 Arizona #105 of 119; 2006 Washington #111 of 119. Marked: 2006 Washington State, ranked 17 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 33.
Defensive EPAmedian #47
Defensive EPA. Pac-10, 2006, best rank first: 2006 UCLA #26 of 119; 2006 Oregon #36 of 119; 2006 Oregon State #42 of 119; 2006 Arizona State #44 of 119; 2006 California #47 of 119; 2006 USC #48 of 119; 2006 Arizona #52 of 119; 2006 Washington #97 of 119; 2006 Stanford #111 of 119. Marked: 2006 Washington State, ranked 58 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 47.
Offensive success ratemedian #37
Offensive success rate. Pac-10, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Oregon #4 of 119; 2006 California #20 of 119; 2006 USC #30 of 119; 2006 Oregon State #36 of 119; 2006 Arizona State #37 of 119; 2006 UCLA #69 of 119; 2006 Stanford #85 of 119; 2006 Washington #102 of 119; 2006 Arizona #112 of 119. Marked: 2006 Washington State, ranked 64 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 37.
Defensive success ratemedian #41
Defensive success rate. Pac-10, 2006, best rank first: 2006 USC #23 of 119; 2006 Arizona State #28 of 119; 2006 Oregon #29 of 119; 2006 UCLA #37 of 119; 2006 Oregon State #41 of 119; 2006 California #53 of 119; 2006 Arizona #65 of 119; 2006 Washington #92 of 119; 2006 Stanford #115 of 119. Marked: 2006 Washington State, ranked 58 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 41.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #70
Offensive explosiveness. Pac-10, 2006, best rank first: 2006 California #12 of 119; 2006 Arizona #21 of 119; 2006 USC #25 of 119; 2006 Arizona State #70 of 119; 2006 Oregon State #86 of 119; 2006 Stanford #89 of 119; 2006 Oregon #97 of 119; 2006 Washington #103 of 119; 2006 UCLA #111 of 119. Marked: 2006 Washington State, ranked 9 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 70.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #58
Defensive explosiveness. Pac-10, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Stanford #17 of 119; 2006 Washington #20 of 119; 2006 Arizona #41 of 119; 2006 California #57 of 119; 2006 Oregon #58 of 119; 2006 UCLA #61 of 119; 2006 Arizona State #75 of 119; 2006 Oregon State #84 of 119; 2006 USC #113 of 119. Marked: 2006 Washington State, ranked 91 of 119. Pac-10 median rank 58.