| 2019 | Duke5–7 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #115 (of 130 teams · 329.7 yds/g · 3,956 yards) | #94 (of 130 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 303 points) | #55 (of 130 teams · 378.3 yds/g allowed · 4,539 yards) | #77 (of 130 teams · 29.2 pts/g allowed · 350 points) | #94 (of 130 teams · -3.9 /g · -47 on the season) | #125 (of 130 teams · -12 on the season · 17 taken, 29 given · -1.00 /g) | #89 (of 130 teams · 29:02 /g · 5h 48m on the season) | #98 (of 130 teams · 17% of last season's passing production returning) | #124 (of 130 teams · 26% of last season's receiving production returning) | #41 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's rushing production returning) | #44 (of 130 teams · 633.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #122 (of 130 teams · 0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #50 (of 130 teams · 0.131 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #120 (of 130 teams · 37% of plays successful) | #34 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #100 (of 130 teams · 1.150 average PPA on successful plays) | #93 (of 130 teams · 1.257 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| Median | of 14 ACC teams in 2019 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range 0–4.) | 0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | 0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | #71 (Total offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range #5–#127. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #66 (Scoring offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range #4–#124. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #55 (Total defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range #6–#125. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #67 (Scoring defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range #3–#109. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #69 (Point margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range #2–#123. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #70 (Turnover margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range #8–#126. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #59 (Possession: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range #12–#126. 0 of 14 in the top 10.) | #55 (Returning passing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range #16–#127. 0 of 14 in the top 10.) | #60 (Returning receiving: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range #23–#124. 0 of 14 in the top 10.) | #76 (Returning rushing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range #21–#121. 0 of 14 in the top 10.) | #38 (Team talent: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range #6–#66. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #74 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range #5–#122. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #50 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range #3–#107. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #78 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range #7–#124. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #46 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range #4–#99. 3 of 14 in the top 10.) | #56 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range #1–#126. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #83 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range #4–#129. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) |
| 2019 | Boston College6–7 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #47 (of 130 teams · 429.1 yds/g · 5,579 yards) | #66 (of 130 teams · 29.0 pts/g · 377 points) | #125 (of 130 teams · 478.7 yds/g allowed · 6,223 yards) | #101 (of 130 teams · 32.1 pts/g allowed · 418 points) | #90 (of 130 teams · -3.1 /g · -41 on the season) | #31 (of 130 teams · +5 on the season · 17 taken, 12 given · +0.38 /g) | #112 (of 130 teams · 27:49 /g · 6h 02m on the season) | #55 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's passing production returning) | #57 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning) | #21 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing production returning) | #65 (of 130 teams · 565.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #38 (of 130 teams · 0.219 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #106 (of 130 teams · 0.222 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #69 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful) | #99 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #72 (of 130 teams · 1.201 average PPA on successful plays) | #89 (of 130 teams · 1.256 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Clemson14–1 | 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #2 Ohio State) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #24 Virginia · postseason: #2 Ohio State) | #5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 528.7 yds/g · 7,931 yards) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 43.9 pts/g · 659 points) | #6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 288.3 yds/g allowed · 4,325 yards) | #3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 13.5 pts/g allowed · 203 points) | #2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +30.4 /g · +456 on the season) | #8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +15 on the season · 30 taken, 15 given · +1.00 /g) | #58 (of 130 teams · 30:16 /g · 7h 34m on the season) | #50 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's passing production returning) | #23 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving production returning) | #65 (of 130 teams · 64% of last season's rushing production returning) | #9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 863.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.365 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · -0.001 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 51% of plays successful) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #22 (of 130 teams · 1.290 average PPA on successful plays) | #29 (of 130 teams · 1.145 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Florida State6–7 | 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #60 (of 130 teams · 408.3 yds/g · 5,308 yards) | #73 (of 130 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 363 points) | #90 (of 130 teams · 424.1 yds/g allowed · 5,514 yards) | #67 (of 130 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 362 points) | #69 (of 130 teams · +0.1 /g · +1 on the season) | #86 (of 130 teams · -3 on the season · 18 taken, 21 given · -0.23 /g) | #126 (of 130 teams · 26:15 /g · 5h 41m on the season) | #100 (of 130 teams · 13% of last season's passing production returning) | #31 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving production returning) | #90 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's rushing production returning) | #6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 878.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #64 (of 130 teams · 0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #42 (of 130 teams · 0.116 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #97 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful) | #78 (of 130 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.402 average PPA on successful plays) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.066 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Georgia Tech3–9 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #127 (of 130 teams · 286.3 yds/g · 3,436 yards) | #124 (of 130 teams · 16.7 pts/g · 200 points) | #89 (of 130 teams · 422.9 yds/g allowed · 5,075 yards) | #104 (of 130 teams · 32.4 pts/g allowed · 389 points) | #123 (of 130 teams · -15.8 /g · -189 on the season) | #93 (of 130 teams · -4 on the season · 16 taken, 20 given · -0.33 /g) | #121 (of 130 teams · 26:43 /g · 5h 21m on the season) | #99 (of 130 teams · 16% of last season's passing production returning) | #111 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's receiving production returning) | #78 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's rushing production returning) | #45 (of 130 teams · 629.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #118 (of 130 teams · 0.047 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #91 (of 130 teams · 0.200 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #124 (of 130 teams · 36% of plays successful) | #84 (of 130 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #52 (of 130 teams · 1.238 average PPA on successful plays) | #40 (of 130 teams · 1.175 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Louisville8–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #24 Virginia) | #23 (of 130 teams · 447.4 yds/g · 5,816 yards) | #30 (of 130 teams · 33.1 pts/g · 430 points) | #102 (of 130 teams · 440.1 yds/g allowed · 5,721 yards) | #109 (of 130 teams · 33.4 pts/g allowed · 434 points) | #74 (of 130 teams · -0.3 /g · -4 on the season) | #70 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 18 taken, 19 given · -0.08 /g) | #34 (of 130 teams · 31:13 /g · 6h 46m on the season) | #42 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's passing production returning) | #65 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving production returning) | #76 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's rushing production returning) | #38 (of 130 teams · 645.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #15 (of 130 teams · 0.275 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #107 (of 130 teams · 0.228 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #70 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful) | #89 (of 130 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.493 average PPA on successful plays) | #111 (of 130 teams · 1.296 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Miami6–7 | 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #24 Virginia) | #98 (of 130 teams · 367.2 yds/g · 4,774 yards) | #90 (of 130 teams · 25.7 pts/g · 334 points) | #13 (of 130 teams · 309.9 yds/g allowed · 4,028 yards) | #23 (of 130 teams · 20.2 pts/g allowed · 263 points) | #47 (of 130 teams · +5.5 /g · +71 on the season) | #47 (of 130 teams · +3 on the season · 20 taken, 17 given · +0.23 /g) | #61 (of 130 teams · 30:12 /g · 6h 33m on the season) | #78 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's passing production returning) | #51 (of 130 teams · 64% of last season's receiving production returning) | #101 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's rushing production returning) | #18 (of 130 teams · 815.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #92 (of 130 teams · 0.130 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #22 (of 130 teams · 0.070 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #90 (of 130 teams · 41% of plays successful) | #5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #37 (of 130 teams · 1.261 average PPA on successful plays) | #118 (of 130 teams · 1.317 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | NC State4–8 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #88 (of 130 teams · 380.3 yds/g · 4,563 yards) | #107 (of 130 teams · 22.1 pts/g · 265 points) | #72 (of 130 teams · 398.9 yds/g allowed · 4,787 yards) | #82 (of 130 teams · 30.1 pts/g allowed · 361 points) | #104 (of 130 teams · -8.0 /g · -96 on the season) | #126 (of 130 teams · -13 on the season · 8 taken, 21 given · -1.08 /g) | #78 (of 130 teams · 29:23 /g · 5h 53m on the season) | #127 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning) | #106 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's receiving production returning) | #118 (of 130 teams · 34% of last season's rushing production returning) | #36 (of 130 teams · 668.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #105 (of 130 teams · 0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #86 (of 130 teams · 0.188 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #81 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful) | #57 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #124 (of 130 teams · 1.083 average PPA on successful plays) | #83 (of 130 teams · 1.237 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | North Carolina7–6 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #12 (of 130 teams · 474.0 yds/g · 6,162 yards) | #30 (of 130 teams · 33.1 pts/g · 430 points) | #50 (of 130 teams · 373.1 yds/g allowed · 4,851 yards) | #44 (of 130 teams · 23.7 pts/g allowed · 308 points) | #29 (of 130 teams · +9.4 /g · +122 on the season) | #14 (of 130 teams · +9 on the season · 21 taken, 12 given · +0.69 /g) | #54 (of 130 teams · 30:20 /g · 6h 34m on the season) | #109 (of 130 teams · 5% of last season's passing production returning) | #47 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's receiving production returning) | #67 (of 130 teams · 63% of last season's rushing production returning) | #28 (of 130 teams · 697.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #20 (of 130 teams · 0.256 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #40 (of 130 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #38 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful) | #46 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #21 (of 130 teams · 1.290 average PPA on successful plays) | #54 (of 130 teams · 1.202 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Pittsburgh8–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #87 (of 130 teams · 380.5 yds/g · 4,946 yards) | #114 (of 130 teams · 21.1 pts/g · 275 points) | #15 (of 130 teams · 312.9 yds/g allowed · 4,068 yards) | #36 (of 130 teams · 22.5 pts/g allowed · 292 points) | #80 (of 130 teams · -1.3 /g · -17 on the season) | #112 (of 130 teams · -8 on the season · 14 taken, 22 given · -0.62 /g) | #44 (of 130 teams · 30:40 /g · 6h 39m on the season) | #23 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning) | #70 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving production returning) | #121 (of 130 teams · 32% of last season's rushing production returning) | #42 (of 130 teams · 638.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #107 (of 130 teams · 0.089 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #11 (of 130 teams · 0.038 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #94 (of 130 teams · 41% of plays successful) | #9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #126 (of 130 teams · 1.080 average PPA on successful plays) | #44 (of 130 teams · 1.181 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Syracuse5–7 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #71 (of 130 teams · 394.6 yds/g · 4,735 yards) | #69 (of 130 teams · 28.3 pts/g · 339 points) | #115 (of 130 teams · 464.1 yds/g allowed · 5,569 yards) | #88 (of 130 teams · 30.7 pts/g allowed · 368 points) | #86 (of 130 teams · -2.4 /g · -29 on the season) | #12 (of 130 teams · +9 on the season · 25 taken, 16 given · +0.75 /g) | #82 (of 130 teams · 29:19 /g · 5h 52m on the season) | #92 (of 130 teams · 22% of last season's passing production returning) | #60 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's receiving production returning) | #92 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's rushing production returning) | #62 (of 130 teams · 574.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #102 (of 130 teams · 0.099 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #82 (of 130 teams · 0.185 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #111 (of 130 teams · 39% of plays successful) | #75 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #56 (of 130 teams · 1.228 average PPA on successful plays) | #104 (of 130 teams · 1.283 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Virginia9–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #81 (of 130 teams · 388.9 yds/g · 5,445 yards) | #40 (of 130 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 449 points) | #47 (of 130 teams · 371.9 yds/g allowed · 5,206 yards) | #62 (of 130 teams · 27.1 pts/g allowed · 380 points) | #50 (of 130 teams · +4.9 /g · +69 on the season) | #85 (of 130 teams · -3 on the season · 18 taken, 21 given · -0.21 /g) | #12 (of 130 teams · 33:03 /g · 7h 43m on the season) | #16 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning) | #84 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving production returning) | #91 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's rushing production returning) | #59 (of 130 teams · 580.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #73 (of 130 teams · 0.161 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #78 (of 130 teams · 0.179 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #32 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful) | #40 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #112 (of 130 teams · 1.126 average PPA on successful plays) | #125 (of 130 teams · 1.347 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Virginia Tech8–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #86 (of 130 teams · 384.9 yds/g · 5,004 yards) | #49 (of 130 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 401 points) | #42 (of 130 teams · 363.3 yds/g allowed · 4,723 yards) | #46 (of 130 teams · 24.7 pts/g allowed · 321 points) | #44 (of 130 teams · +6.2 /g · +80 on the season) | #86 (of 130 teams · -3 on the season · 19 taken, 22 given · -0.23 /g) | #40 (of 130 teams · 30:49 /g · 6h 41m on the season) | #53 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's passing production returning) | #52 (of 130 teams · 63% of last season's receiving production returning) | #68 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's rushing production returning) | #29 (of 130 teams · 696.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #75 (of 130 teams · 0.158 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #38 (of 130 teams · 0.103 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #71 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful) | #16 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #102 (of 130 teams · 1.146 average PPA on successful plays) | #129 (of 130 teams · 1.368 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Wake Forest8–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2019. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #15 (of 130 teams · 463.9 yds/g · 6,030 yards) | #42 (of 130 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 414 points) | #85 (of 130 teams · 416.5 yds/g allowed · 5,414 yards) | #76 (of 130 teams · 29.1 pts/g allowed · 378 points) | #56 (of 130 teams · +2.8 /g · +36 on the season) | #19 (of 130 teams · +8 on the season · 25 taken, 17 given · +0.62 /g) | #59 (of 130 teams · 30:16 /g · 6h 33m on the season) | #19 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning) | #92 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's receiving production returning) | #50 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's rushing production returning) | #66 (of 130 teams · 563.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #74 (of 130 teams · 0.159 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #70 (of 130 teams · 0.161 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #78 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful) | #48 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #85 (of 130 teams · 1.171 average PPA on successful plays) | #80 (of 130 teams · 1.233 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |