THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

DukeBlue Devils

Season
‹

ACC

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Duke played 6 such games.

ACC, 2026

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2026Duke6–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#27 (of 69 teams · 391.0 yds/g · 2,346 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 177 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 69 teams · 315.7 yds/g allowed · 1,894 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 17.3 pts/g allowed · 104 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +12.2 /g · +73 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · +4 in these games · 8 taken, 4 given · +0.67 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 69 teams · 31:00 /g · 3h 06m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#119 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 138 teams · 23% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 138 teams · 49% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 138 teams · 668.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.268 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · 0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 42% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.376 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.093 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 17 ACC teams in 20260 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#33 (Total offense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #2–#62. 3 of 17 in the top 10.)#37 (Scoring offense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #2–#65. 3 of 17 in the top 10.)#34 (Total defense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #13–#68. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#42 (Scoring defense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #10–#69. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#42 (Point margin: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #2–#69. 3 of 17 in the top 10.)#29 (Turnover margin: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #8–#66. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#40 (Possession: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #1–#65. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#98 (Returning passing: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #17–#127. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#91 (Returning receiving: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #17–#126. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#83 (Returning rushing: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #11–#129. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#34 (Team talent: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #12–#71. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#30 (Offensive EPA: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #1–#62. 5 of 17 in the top 10.)#39 (Defensive EPA: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #12–#69. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#34 (Offensive success rate: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #5–#65. 3 of 17 in the top 10.)#41 (Defensive success rate: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #8–#69. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#26 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #2–#66. 3 of 17 in the top 10.)#46 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range #2–#69. 4 of 17 in the top 10.)
2026Louisville5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 471.7 yds/g · 3,302 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 37.7 pts/g · 264 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 433.9 yds/g allowed · 3,037 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 29.0 pts/g allowed · 203 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · +8.7 /g · +61 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +6 in these games · 13 taken, 7 given · +0.86 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · 28:42 /g · 3h 21m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 138 teams · 24% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 138 teams · 61% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 138 teams · 740.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.310 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 69 teams · 0.114 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 48% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 69 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.442 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · 1.339 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Miami8–02 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 475.2 yds/g · 2,851 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 42.0 pts/g · 252 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · 372.7 yds/g allowed · 2,236 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 22.0 pts/g allowed · 132 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +20.0 /g · +120 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · +4 in these games · 7 taken, 3 given · +0.67 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 34:13 /g · 3h 25m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#98 (of 138 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 138 teams · 90% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 138 teams · 885.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.369 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · 0.110 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 49% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · 1.306 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 1.344 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Wake Forest7–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 442.9 yds/g · 3,100 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 39.3 pts/g · 275 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 326.1 yds/g allowed · 2,283 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · 18.1 pts/g allowed · 127 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +21.1 /g · +148 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 4 taken, 3 given · +0.14 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · 29:01 /g · 3h 23m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#101 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 138 teams · 28% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 (of 138 teams · 10% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 138 teams · 680.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.374 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 50% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 1.292 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.071 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026North Carolina4–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#52 (of 69 teams · 332.9 yds/g · 2,330 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 171 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 395.7 yds/g allowed · 2,770 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 181 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · -1.4 /g · -10 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · -5 in these games · 6 taken, 11 given · -0.71 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 27:51 /g · 3h 15m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#95 (of 138 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 138 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 138 teams · 767.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 69 teams · 0.142 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 0.141 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 46% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 1.148 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.115 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Syracuse4–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#22 (of 69 teams · 411.3 yds/g · 2,468 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 143 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · 353.8 yds/g allowed · 2,123 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 167 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · -4.0 /g · -24 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · -3 in these games · 5 taken, 8 given · -0.50 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 32:39 /g · 3h 16m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 (of 138 teams · 11% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 138 teams · 20% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 138 teams · 745.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 69 teams · 0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 0.178 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · 40% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 69 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · 1.232 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 1.204 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Clemson5–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#59 (of 69 teams · 316.3 yds/g · 1,898 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · 21.2 pts/g · 127 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 382.0 yds/g allowed · 2,292 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · 27.7 pts/g allowed · 166 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · -6.5 /g · -39 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 69 teams · +2 in these games · 9 taken, 7 given · +0.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 28:57 /g · 2h 54m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#80 (of 138 teams · 18% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 138 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#87 (of 138 teams · 30% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 138 teams · 862.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 69 teams · 0.032 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 0.132 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 36% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 69 teams · 1.268 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.158 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026NC State4–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#44 (of 69 teams · 345.5 yds/g · 2,073 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 143 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · 406.7 yds/g allowed · 2,440 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 176 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 69 teams · -5.5 /g · -33 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · -1 in these games · 7 taken, 8 given · -0.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 30:17 /g · 3h 02m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 138 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 138 teams · 28% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 138 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 138 teams · 757.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 69 teams · 0.142 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · 0.241 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 41% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 1.219 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 69 teams · 1.324 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026SMU6–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#15 (of 69 teams · 433.2 yds/g · 2,599 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 32.0 pts/g · 192 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 69 teams · 331.5 yds/g allowed · 1,989 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 24.0 pts/g allowed · 144 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · +8.0 /g · +48 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -6 in these games · 3 taken, 9 given · -1.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · 29:26 /g · 2h 57m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 138 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 138 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 138 teams · 30% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 138 teams · 764.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.261 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 69 teams · 0.183 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 69 teams · 47% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · 1.293 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 1.308 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Virginia Tech6–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#26 (of 69 teams · 393.0 yds/g · 2,358 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 69 teams · 27.2 pts/g · 163 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 69 teams · 349.7 yds/g allowed · 2,098 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 140 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · +3.8 /g · +23 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · -4 in these games · 2 taken, 6 given · -0.67 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 31:49 /g · 3h 11m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 138 teams · 58% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 138 teams · 32% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 138 teams · 769.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 69 teams · 0.191 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 44% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 69 teams · 1.293 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · 1.260 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Pittsburgh6–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#33 (of 69 teams · 371.9 yds/g · 2,603 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 69 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 169 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 69 teams · 351.9 yds/g allowed · 2,463 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 23.4 pts/g allowed · 164 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0.7 /g · +5 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · +2 in these games · 12 taken, 10 given · +0.29 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 30:39 /g · 3h 35m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 138 teams · 68% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#99 (of 138 teams · 26% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 138 teams · 675.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 69 teams · 0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 0.067 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 41% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.123 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.513 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Boston College4–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#41 (of 69 teams · 354.9 yds/g · 2,484 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 151 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · 349.3 yds/g allowed · 2,445 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 69 teams · 28.0 pts/g allowed · 196 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · -6.4 /g · -45 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 11 taken, 10 given · +0.14 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 26:43 /g · 3h 07m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#109 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 138 teams · 21% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#129 — bottom 10 (of 138 teams · 8% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 138 teams · 660.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 69 teams · 0.099 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 0.096 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 69 teams · 42% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 1.286 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · 1.217 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Virginia4–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 314.4 yds/g · 2,201 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 18.9 pts/g · 132 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 395.4 yds/g allowed · 2,768 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 202 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · -10.0 /g · -70 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0 in these games · 4 taken, 4 given · +0.00 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 69 teams · 31:11 /g · 3h 38m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#119 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 138 teams · 21% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 138 teams · 21% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 138 teams · 700.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 69 teams · 0.057 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 69 teams · 0.237 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 40% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 69 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.090 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 1.308 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Florida State3–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#21 (of 69 teams · 413.2 yds/g · 2,479 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 177 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 471.3 yds/g allowed · 2,828 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 34.5 pts/g allowed · 207 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · -5.0 /g · -30 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -7 in these games · 5 taken, 12 given · -1.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 69 teams · 28:38 /g · 2h 52m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#93 (of 138 teams · 6% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 138 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 138 teams · 33% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 138 teams · 800.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 69 teams · 0.148 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · 0.240 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 41% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.421 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.359 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Georgia Tech2–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#41 (of 69 teams · 354.9 yds/g · 2,484 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 22.0 pts/g · 154 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · 432.0 yds/g allowed · 3,024 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 33.6 pts/g allowed · 235 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · -11.6 /g · -81 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -7 in these games · 4 taken, 11 given · -1.00 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 27:19 /g · 3h 11m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 (of 138 teams · 14% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 138 teams · 28% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 138 teams · 751.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 69 teams · 0.082 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · 0.248 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 69 teams · 40% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · 1.312 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 69 teams · 1.292 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026California3–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 304.7 yds/g · 2,133 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 16.7 pts/g · 117 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · 427.0 yds/g allowed · 2,989 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 34.0 pts/g allowed · 238 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -17.3 /g · -121 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 7 taken, 6 given · +0.14 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · 30:15 /g · 3h 32m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 138 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 138 teams · 31% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 138 teams · 14% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 138 teams · 751.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.257 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 36% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 69 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · 1.146 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 69 teams · 1.308 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Stanford4–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2026. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#56 (of 69 teams · 320.7 yds/g · 2,245 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 16.0 pts/g · 112 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 499.0 yds/g allowed · 3,493 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 43.1 pts/g allowed · 302 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -27.1 /g · -190 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0 in these games · 7 taken, 7 given · +0.00 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 27:18 /g · 3h 11m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#103 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 138 teams · 32% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 138 teams · 63% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 138 teams · 705.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 69 teams · 0.038 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.435 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 35% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 54% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 1.342 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 69 teams · 1.338 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20262026 DukeACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #33
Total offense. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami #2 of 69; 2026 Louisville #3 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #9 of 69; 2026 SMU #15 of 69; 2026 Florida State #21 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #22 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #26 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #33 of 69; 2026 Boston College #41 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #41 of 69; 2026 NC State #44 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #52 of 69; 2026 Stanford #56 of 69; 2026 Clemson #59 of 69; 2026 Virginia #60 of 69; 2026 California #62 of 69. Marked: 2026 Duke, ranked 27 of 69. ACC median rank 33.
Scoring offensemedian #37
Scoring offense. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami #2 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #4 of 69; 2026 Louisville #5 of 69; 2026 SMU #16 of 69; 2026 Florida State #19 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #28 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #36 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #37 of 69; 2026 NC State #39 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #39 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #47 of 69; 2026 Boston College #49 of 69; 2026 Clemson #52 of 69; 2026 Virginia #58 of 69; 2026 California #62 of 69; 2026 Stanford #65 of 69. Marked: 2026 Duke, ranked 19 of 69. ACC median rank 37.
Total defensemedian #34
Total defense. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Wake Forest #16 of 69; 2026 SMU #17 of 69; 2026 Boston College #20 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #21 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #23 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #25 of 69; 2026 Miami #31 of 69; 2026 Clemson #34 of 69; 2026 Virginia #47 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #48 of 69; 2026 NC State #52 of 69; 2026 California #56 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #57 of 69; 2026 Louisville #58 of 69; 2026 Florida State #66 of 69; 2026 Stanford #68 of 69. Marked: 2026 Duke, ranked 13 of 69. ACC median rank 34.
Scoring defensemedian #42
Scoring defense. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Wake Forest #12 of 69; 2026 Miami #22 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #25 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #26 of 69; 2026 SMU #27 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #34 of 69; 2026 Clemson #40 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #42 of 69; 2026 Boston College #43 of 69; 2026 Virginia #44 of 69; 2026 Louisville #45 of 69; 2026 NC State #47 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #60 of 69; 2026 California #61 of 69; 2026 Florida State #63 of 69; 2026 Stanford #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Duke, ranked 10 of 69. ACC median rank 42.
Point marginmedian #42
Point margin. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Wake Forest #2 of 69; 2026 Miami #3 of 69; 2026 Louisville #18 of 69; 2026 SMU #20 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #27 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #29 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #36 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #42 of 69; 2026 Florida State #44 of 69; 2026 NC State #46 of 69; 2026 Boston College #48 of 69; 2026 Clemson #49 of 69; 2026 Virginia #57 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #59 of 69; 2026 California #66 of 69; 2026 Stanford #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Duke, ranked 10 of 69. ACC median rank 42.
Turnover marginmedian #29
Turnover margin. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Louisville #8 of 69; 2026 Miami #12 of 69; 2026 Clemson #17 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #18 of 69; 2026 Boston College #25 of 69; 2026 California #25 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #25 of 69; 2026 Stanford #29 of 69; 2026 Virginia #29 of 69; 2026 NC State #40 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #52 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #56 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #58 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #60 of 69; 2026 SMU #60 of 69; 2026 Florida State #66 of 69. Marked: 2026 Duke, ranked 12 of 69. ACC median rank 29.
Possessionmedian #40
Possession. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami #1 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #10 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #16 of 69; 2026 Virginia #21 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #26 of 69; 2026 NC State #30 of 69; 2026 California #31 of 69; 2026 SMU #40 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #42 of 69; 2026 Clemson #45 of 69; 2026 Louisville #49 of 69; 2026 Florida State #50 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #58 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #63 of 69; 2026 Stanford #64 of 69; 2026 Boston College #65 of 69. Marked: 2026 Duke, ranked 24 of 69. ACC median rank 40.
Returning passingmedian #98
Returning passing. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 SMU #17 of 138; 2026 NC State #29 of 138; 2026 California #30 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #59 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #63 of 138; 2026 Clemson #80 of 138; 2026 Florida State #93 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #95 of 138; 2026 Miami #98 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #101 of 138; 2026 Stanford #103 of 138; 2026 Boston College #109 of 138; 2026 Virginia #119 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #127 of 138; 2026 Louisville #127 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #127 of 138. Marked: 2026 Duke, ranked 119 of 138. ACC median rank 98.
Returning receivingmedian #91
Returning receiving. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Clemson #17 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #27 of 138; 2026 Florida State #29 of 138; 2026 Miami #32 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #53 of 138; 2026 SMU #69 of 138; 2026 Stanford #81 of 138; 2026 California #83 of 138; 2026 NC State #91 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #94 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #99 of 138; 2026 Louisville #103 of 138; 2026 Boston College #108 of 138; 2026 Virginia #109 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #121 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #126 of 138. Marked: 2026 Duke, ranked 106 of 138. ACC median rank 91.
Returning rushingmedian #83
Returning rushing. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami #11 of 138; 2026 Stanford #34 of 138; 2026 Louisville #36 of 138; 2026 NC State #48 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #49 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #50 of 138; 2026 Florida State #82 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #83 of 138; 2026 Clemson #87 of 138; 2026 SMU #88 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #93 of 138; 2026 Virginia #104 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #105 of 138; 2026 California #119 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #125 of 138; 2026 Boston College #129 of 138. Marked: 2026 Duke, ranked 59 of 138. ACC median rank 83.
Team talentmedian #34
Team talent. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami #12 of 138; 2026 Clemson #16 of 138; 2026 Florida State #21 of 138; 2026 Virginia Tech #27 of 138; 2026 North Carolina #28 of 138; 2026 SMU #31 of 138; 2026 NC State #32 of 138; 2026 California #33 of 138; 2026 Georgia Tech #34 of 138; 2026 Syracuse #35 of 138; 2026 Louisville #37 of 138; 2026 Stanford #50 of 138; 2026 Virginia #53 of 138; 2026 Wake Forest #63 of 138; 2026 Pittsburgh #64 of 138; 2026 Boston College #71 of 138. Marked: 2026 Duke, ranked 69 of 138. ACC median rank 34.
Offensive EPAmedian #30
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Wake Forest #1 of 69; 2026 Miami #2 of 69; 2026 Louisville #6 of 69; 2026 SMU #10 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #21 of 69; 2026 Florida State #27 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #29 of 69; 2026 NC State #30 of 69; 2026 Boston College #38 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #41 of 69; 2026 Virginia #46 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #48 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #51 of 69; 2026 Stanford #55 of 69; 2026 Clemson #57 of 69; 2026 California #62 of 69. Marked: 2026 Duke, ranked 9 of 69. ACC median rank 30.
Defensive EPAmedian #39
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Wake Forest #15 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #22 of 69; 2026 Boston College #30 of 69; 2026 Miami #31 of 69; 2026 Louisville #32 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #34 of 69; 2026 Clemson #35 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #39 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #45 of 69; 2026 SMU #51 of 69; 2026 Virginia #55 of 69; 2026 Florida State #56 of 69; 2026 NC State #57 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #59 of 69; 2026 California #60 of 69; 2026 Stanford #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Duke, ranked 12 of 69. ACC median rank 39.
Offensive success ratemedian #34
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Wake Forest #5 of 69; 2026 Miami #7 of 69; 2026 Louisville #10 of 69; 2026 SMU #13 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #16 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #22 of 69; 2026 Boston College #33 of 69; 2026 Florida State #34 of 69; 2026 NC State #35 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #39 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #41 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #44 of 69; 2026 Virginia #47 of 69; 2026 Clemson #61 of 69; 2026 California #63 of 69; 2026 Stanford #65 of 69. Marked: 2026 Duke, ranked 26 of 69. ACC median rank 34.
Defensive success ratemedian #41
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Pittsburgh #8 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #22 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #25 of 69; 2026 SMU #27 of 69; 2026 Louisville #28 of 69; 2026 Miami #30 of 69; 2026 Boston College #34 of 69; 2026 Virginia #41 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #44 of 69; 2026 Florida State #47 of 69; 2026 Clemson #48 of 69; 2026 NC State #49 of 69; 2026 California #50 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #52 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #55 of 69; 2026 Stanford #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Duke, ranked 35 of 69. ACC median rank 41.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #26
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Louisville #2 of 69; 2026 Florida State #4 of 69; 2026 Stanford #16 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #18 of 69; 2026 Miami #20 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #24 of 69; 2026 SMU #25 of 69; 2026 Wake Forest #26 of 69; 2026 Boston College #27 of 69; 2026 Clemson #33 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #40 of 69; 2026 NC State #45 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #58 of 69; 2026 California #59 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #63 of 69; 2026 Virginia #66 of 69. Marked: 2026 Duke, ranked 9 of 69. ACC median rank 26.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #46
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Wake Forest #2 of 69; 2026 North Carolina #4 of 69; 2026 Clemson #9 of 69; 2026 Syracuse #22 of 69; 2026 Boston College #25 of 69; 2026 Virginia Tech #36 of 69; 2026 Georgia Tech #41 of 69; 2026 California #46 of 69; 2026 SMU #47 of 69; 2026 Virginia #48 of 69; 2026 NC State #53 of 69; 2026 Stanford #54 of 69; 2026 Louisville #56 of 69; 2026 Miami #58 of 69; 2026 Florida State #64 of 69; 2026 Pittsburgh #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Duke, ranked 3 of 69. ACC median rank 46.