| 2004 | New Mexico State5–6 | 0 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #56 (of 119 teams · 372.9 yds/g · 4,102 yds) | #60 (of 119 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 273 points) | #98 (of 119 teams · 418.9 yds/g allowed · 4,608 yds) | #98 (of 119 teams · 32.3 pts/g allowed · 355 points) | #93 (of 119 teams · -7.5 /g · -82 on the season) | #44 (of 119 teams · +3 on the season · 24 taken, 21 given · +0.27 /g) | #79 (of 119 teams · 17:41 /g · 3h 14m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #103 (of 119 teams · -0.162 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #112 — bottom 10 (of 119 teams · 0.127 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #80 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful) | #112 — bottom 10 (of 119 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #111 — bottom 10 (of 119 teams · 0.858 average PPA on successful plays) | #26 (of 119 teams · 0.902 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| Median | of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | #73 (Total offense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range #47–#110. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #87 (Scoring offense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range #53–#113. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #94 (Total defense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range #20–#107. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #82 (Scoring defense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range #10–#115. 1 of 9 in the top 10.) | #93 (Point margin: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range #31–#118. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #77 (Turnover margin: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range #8–#92. 2 of 9 in the top 10.) | #67 (Possession: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range #11–#88. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | — (No team has a rank for this) | — (No team has a rank for this) | — (No team has a rank for this) | — (No team has a rank for this) | #102 (Offensive EPA: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range #1–#116. 1 of 9 in the top 10.) | #106 (Defensive EPA: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range #52–#118. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #96 (Offensive success rate: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range #34–#111. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #109 (Defensive success rate: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range #53–#115. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #80 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range #1–#112. 2 of 9 in the top 10.) | #53 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range #1–#90. 2 of 9 in the top 10.) |
| 2004 | Louisiana4–7 | 0 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #47 (of 119 teams · 382.4 yds/g · 4,206 yds) | #87 (of 119 teams · 22.0 pts/g · 242 points) | #70 (of 119 teams · 387.9 yds/g allowed · 4,267 yds) | #53 (of 119 teams · 24.7 pts/g allowed · 272 points) | #74 (of 119 teams · -2.7 /g · -30 on the season) | #77 (of 119 teams · -3 on the season · 21 taken, 24 given · -0.27 /g) | #64 (of 119 teams · 18:01 /g · 3h 18m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.130 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #85 (of 119 teams · 0.007 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #81 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful) | #115 — bottom 10 (of 119 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.487 average PPA on successful plays) | #1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.680 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2004 | Arkansas State3–8 | 0 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #68 (of 119 teams · 358.2 yds/g · 3,940 yds) | #105 (of 119 teams · 19.6 pts/g · 215 points) | #102 (of 119 teams · 422.4 yds/g allowed · 4,646 yds) | #103 (of 119 teams · 33.2 pts/g allowed · 365 points) | #106 (of 119 teams · -13.6 /g · -150 on the season) | #92 (of 119 teams · -6 on the season · 23 taken, 29 given · -0.55 /g) | #67 (of 119 teams · 17:59 /g · 3h 18m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #26 (of 119 teams · -0.004 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #113 — bottom 10 (of 119 teams · 0.150 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #74 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful) | #106 (of 119 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.206 average PPA on successful plays) | #69 (of 119 teams · 1.006 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2004 | North Texas7–5 | 0 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #80 (of 119 teams · 344.0 yds/g · 4,128 yds) | #53 (of 119 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 309 points) | #95 (of 119 teams · 414.2 yds/g allowed · 4,970 yds) | #82 (of 119 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 358 points) | #77 (of 119 teams · -4.1 /g · -49 on the season) | #8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +13 on the season · 27 taken, 14 given · +1.08 /g) | #72 (of 119 teams · 17:52 /g · 3h 34m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #110 — bottom 10 (of 119 teams · -0.181 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #106 (of 119 teams · 0.083 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #108 (of 119 teams · 28% of plays successful) | #104 (of 119 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #21 (of 119 teams · 1.077 average PPA on successful plays) | #70 (of 119 teams · 1.008 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2004 | Troy7–5 | 0 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #110 — bottom 10 (of 119 teams · 284.2 yds/g · 3,410 yds) | #76 (of 119 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 286 points) | #20 (of 119 teams · 311.0 yds/g allowed · 3,732 yds) | #10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 16.7 pts/g allowed · 200 points) | #31 (of 119 teams · +7.2 /g · +86 on the season) | #9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +12 on the season · 34 taken, 22 given · +1.00 /g) | #84 (of 119 teams · 17:29 /g · 3h 30m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #109 (of 119 teams · -0.180 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #70 (of 119 teams · -0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #111 — bottom 10 (of 119 teams · 27% of plays successful) | #53 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #97 (of 119 teams · 0.923 average PPA on successful plays) | #53 (of 119 teams · 0.977 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2004 | UL Monroe5–6 | 0 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #73 (of 119 teams · 353.0 yds/g · 3,883 yds) | #108 (of 119 teams · 19.2 pts/g · 211 points) | #72 (of 119 teams · 388.1 yds/g allowed · 4,269 yds) | #74 (of 119 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 303 points) | #95 (of 119 teams · -8.4 /g · -92 on the season) | #66 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 23 taken, 24 given · -0.09 /g) | #59 (of 119 teams · 18:07 /g · 3h 19m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #86 (of 119 teams · -0.131 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #114 — bottom 10 (of 119 teams · 0.159 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #101 (of 119 teams · 30% of plays successful) | #96 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #76 (of 119 teams · 0.964 average PPA on successful plays) | #90 (of 119 teams · 1.042 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2004 | Idaho3–9 | 0 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #82 (of 119 teams · 340.1 yds/g · 4,081 yds) | #101 (of 119 teams · 20.4 pts/g · 245 points) | #107 (of 119 teams · 428.7 yds/g allowed · 5,144 yds) | #115 — bottom 10 (of 119 teams · 39.4 pts/g allowed · 473 points) | #118 — bottom 10 (of 119 teams · -19.0 /g · -228 on the season) | #81 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 27 taken, 31 given · -0.33 /g) | #11 (of 119 teams · 19:23 /g · 3h 53m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #102 (of 119 teams · -0.158 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #52 (of 119 teams · -0.046 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #96 (of 119 teams · 31% of plays successful) | #109 (of 119 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #102 (of 119 teams · 0.898 average PPA on successful plays) | #11 (of 119 teams · 0.869 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2004 | Middle Tennessee5–6 | 0 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #55 (of 119 teams · 374.3 yds/g · 4,117 yds) | #67 (of 119 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 269 points) | #94 (of 119 teams · 412.3 yds/g allowed · 4,535 yds) | #69 (of 119 teams · 26.6 pts/g allowed · 293 points) | #70 (of 119 teams · -2.2 /g · -24 on the season) | #92 (of 119 teams · -6 on the season · 21 taken, 27 given · -0.55 /g) | #38 (of 119 teams · 18:33 /g · 3h 24m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #11 (of 119 teams · 0.060 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #118 — bottom 10 (of 119 teams · 0.246 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #34 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful) | #114 — bottom 10 (of 119 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #80 (of 119 teams · 0.957 average PPA on successful plays) | #83 (of 119 teams · 1.027 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2004 | Utah State3–8 | 0 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #108 (of 119 teams · 290.4 yds/g · 3,194 yds) | #113 — bottom 10 (of 119 teams · 16.7 pts/g · 184 points) | #81 (of 119 teams · 394.6 yds/g allowed · 4,340 yds) | #83 (of 119 teams · 30.3 pts/g allowed · 333 points) | #105 (of 119 teams · -13.6 /g · -149 on the season) | #90 (of 119 teams · -5 on the season · 24 taken, 29 given · -0.45 /g) | #88 (of 119 teams · 17:23 /g · 3h 11m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #116 — bottom 10 (of 119 teams · -0.260 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #97 (of 119 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #98 (of 119 teams · 31% of plays successful) | #110 — bottom 10 (of 119 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #112 — bottom 10 (of 119 teams · 0.847 average PPA on successful plays) | #2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.775 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |