Metrics

New Mexico StateAggies

Season
Current

Sun Belt

Peers are the 25 teams ranked in the last regular-season AP poll of 2004, released in week 15.

AP Top 25, 2004

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2004New Mexico State560 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#56 (of 119 teams · 372.9 yds/g · 4,102 yards)#60 (of 119 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 273 points)#98 (of 119 teams · 418.9 yds/g allowed · 4,608 yards)#98 (of 119 teams · 32.3 pts/g allowed · 355 points)#93 (of 119 teams · -7.5 /g · -82 on the season)#44 (of 119 teams · +3 on the season · 24 taken, 21 given · +0.27 /g)#79 (of 119 teams · 17:41 /g · 3h 14m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#103 (of 119 teams · -0.162 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#112 (of 119 teams · 0.127 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#80 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#112 (of 119 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#111 (of 119 teams · 0.858 average PPA on successful plays)#26 (of 119 teams · 0.902 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#24 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #1–#97. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#25 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #1–#98. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#28 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #5–#82. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#18 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #1–#68. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#16 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #1–#45. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#33 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #1–#95. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#23 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #2–#102. 6 of 25 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#23 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #2–#74. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#26 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #2–#81. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#20 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #1–#92. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#28 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #2–#83. 4 of 25 in the top 10.)#52 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #8–#104. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)#56 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #17–#114. 0 of 25 in the top 10.)
2004USC1300 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#11 (of 119 teams · 449.1 yds/g · 5,838 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 38.1 pts/g · 496 points)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 280.4 yds/g allowed · 3,645 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 13.0 pts/g allowed · 169 points)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +25.1 /g · +327 on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +24 on the season · 43 taken, 19 given · +1.85 /g)#14 (of 119 teams · 19:17 /g · 4h 11m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 119 teams · 0.019 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#16 (of 119 teams · -0.121 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#21 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#58 (of 119 teams · 0.997 average PPA on successful plays)#31 (of 119 teams · 0.930 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Oklahoma1210 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 462.1 yds/g · 6,007 yards)#14 (of 119 teams · 34.8 pts/g · 452 points)#15 (of 119 teams · 299.0 yds/g allowed · 3,887 yards)#11 (of 119 teams · 16.9 pts/g allowed · 219 points)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17.9 /g · +233 on the season)#25 (of 119 teams · +8 on the season · 26 taken, 18 given · +0.62 /g)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:12 /g · 4h 23m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 119 teams · 0.040 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#26 (of 119 teams · -0.103 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#35 (of 119 teams · 1.036 average PPA on successful plays)#100 (of 119 teams · 1.060 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Auburn1300 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#24 (of 119 teams · 420.7 yds/g · 5,469 yards)#18 (of 119 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 417 points)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 277.6 yds/g allowed · 3,609 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 11.3 pts/g allowed · 147 points)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +20.8 /g · +270 on the season)#33 (of 119 teams · +7 on the season · 30 taken, 23 given · +0.54 /g)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:28 /g · 4h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.065 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 119 teams · -0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#82 (of 119 teams · 0.955 average PPA on successful plays)#52 (of 119 teams · 0.977 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004California1020 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 492.4 yds/g · 5,909 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 36.8 pts/g · 441 points)#28 (of 119 teams · 320.9 yds/g allowed · 3,851 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 16.0 pts/g allowed · 192 points)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +20.8 /g · +249 on the season)#51 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 22 taken, 20 given · +0.17 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:19 /g · 4h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.101 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#36 (of 119 teams · -0.074 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 45% of plays successful)#20 (of 119 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#81 (of 119 teams · 0.957 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 119 teams · 1.032 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Utah1200 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 499.8 yds/g · 5,997 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 45.3 pts/g · 544 points)#43 (of 119 teams · 343.4 yds/g allowed · 4,121 yards)#23 (of 119 teams · 19.5 pts/g allowed · 234 points)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +25.8 /g · +310 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +15 on the season · 29 taken, 14 given · +1.25 /g)#21 (of 119 teams · 19:04 /g · 3h 49m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.122 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 119 teams · -0.106 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 46% of plays successful)#37 (of 119 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#69 (of 119 teams · 0.979 average PPA on successful plays)#41 (of 119 teams · 0.950 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Texas1110 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 464.4 yds/g · 5,573 yards)#12 (of 119 teams · 35.3 pts/g · 423 points)#27 (of 119 teams · 320.1 yds/g allowed · 3,841 yards)#19 (of 119 teams · 17.9 pts/g allowed · 215 points)#11 (of 119 teams · +17.3 /g · +208 on the season)#36 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 24 taken, 19 given · +0.42 /g)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:39 /g · 3h 56m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 119 teams · 0.055 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#38 (of 119 teams · -0.072 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#31 (of 119 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#99 (of 119 teams · 0.908 average PPA on successful plays)#73 (of 119 teams · 1.016 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Louisville1110 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 539.0 yds/g · 6,468 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 49.8 pts/g · 597 points)#18 (of 119 teams · 305.9 yds/g allowed · 3,671 yards)#25 (of 119 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 236 points)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +30.1 /g · +361 on the season)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +12 on the season · 28 taken, 16 given · +1.00 /g)#24 (of 119 teams · 18:57 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.092 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 47% of plays successful)#34 (of 119 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 119 teams · 0.999 average PPA on successful plays)#39 (of 119 teams · 0.948 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Georgia1020 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#30 (of 119 teams · 404.5 yds/g · 4,854 yards)#45 (of 119 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 335 points)#11 (of 119 teams · 288.9 yds/g allowed · 3,467 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 16.5 pts/g allowed · 198 points)#16 (of 119 teams · +11.4 /g · +137 on the season)#57 (of 119 teams · +0 on the season · 20 taken, 20 given · +0.00 /g)#43 (of 119 teams · 18:27 /g · 3h 41m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 119 teams · 0.022 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#40 (of 119 teams · -0.071 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#31 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#25 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#17 (of 119 teams · 1.090 average PPA on successful plays)#81 (of 119 teams · 1.026 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Miami930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#64 (of 119 teams · 365.3 yds/g · 4,384 yards)#21 (of 119 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 380 points)#31 (of 119 teams · 328.1 yds/g allowed · 3,937 yards)#13 (of 119 teams · 17.0 pts/g allowed · 204 points)#12 (of 119 teams · +14.7 /g · +176 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17 on the season · 32 taken, 15 given · +1.42 /g)#57 (of 119 teams · 18:08 /g · 3h 38m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 119 teams · -0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#20 (of 119 teams · -0.116 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#61 (of 119 teams · 35% of plays successful)#24 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.133 average PPA on successful plays)#85 (of 119 teams · 1.034 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Virginia Tech1030 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#63 (of 119 teams · 365.5 yds/g · 4,752 yards)#25 (of 119 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 400 points)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 268.0 yds/g allowed · 3,484 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 12.8 pts/g allowed · 167 points)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17.9 /g · +233 on the season)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +13 on the season · 35 taken, 22 given · +1.00 /g)#18 (of 119 teams · 19:08 /g · 4h 09m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 119 teams · -0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.186 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#48 (of 119 teams · 36% of plays successful)#15 (of 119 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#62 (of 119 teams · 0.991 average PPA on successful plays)#29 (of 119 teams · 0.916 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Boise State1110 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 492.7 yds/g · 5,912 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 48.9 pts/g · 587 points)#50 (of 119 teams · 357.8 yds/g allowed · 4,294 yards)#65 (of 119 teams · 25.7 pts/g allowed · 308 points)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +23.3 /g · +279 on the season)#20 (of 119 teams · +8 on the season · 31 taken, 23 given · +0.67 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:45 /g · 3h 57m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 119 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.139 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#11 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#28 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#29 (of 119 teams · 1.045 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 119 teams · 0.993 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Iowa1020 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#97 (of 119 teams · 312.7 yds/g · 3,752 yards)#69 (of 119 teams · 24.3 pts/g · 292 points)#13 (of 119 teams · 293.8 yds/g allowed · 3,526 yards)#17 (of 119 teams · 17.6 pts/g allowed · 211 points)#33 (of 119 teams · +6.8 /g · +81 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +16 on the season · 35 taken, 19 given · +1.33 /g)#17 (of 119 teams · 19:12 /g · 3h 50m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#74 (of 119 teams · -0.100 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#12 (of 119 teams · -0.134 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#92 (of 119 teams · 32% of plays successful)#11 (of 119 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#46 (of 119 teams · 1.021 average PPA on successful plays)#37 (of 119 teams · 0.939 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004LSU930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#37 (of 119 teams · 395.6 yds/g · 4,747 yards)#41 (of 119 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 344 points)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 256.9 yds/g allowed · 3,083 yards)#15 (of 119 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 205 points)#15 (of 119 teams · +11.6 /g · +139 on the season)#63 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 25 taken, 26 given · -0.08 /g)#20 (of 119 teams · 19:04 /g · 3h 49m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 119 teams · 0.007 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#21 (of 119 teams · -0.115 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#13 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 27% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#79 (of 119 teams · 0.958 average PPA on successful plays)#102 (of 119 teams · 1.071 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Michigan930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#44 (of 119 teams · 386.5 yds/g · 4,638 yards)#24 (of 119 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 370 points)#36 (of 119 teams · 336.3 yds/g allowed · 4,035 yards)#43 (of 119 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 279 points)#29 (of 119 teams · +7.6 /g · +91 on the season)#26 (of 119 teams · +7 on the season · 29 taken, 22 given · +0.58 /g)#22 (of 119 teams · 19:03 /g · 3h 49m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 119 teams · -0.025 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.146 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#28 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#19 (of 119 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#104 (of 119 teams · 0.892 average PPA on successful plays)#34 (of 119 teams · 0.936 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Tennessee1030 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#33 (of 119 teams · 399.5 yds/g · 5,193 yards)#39 (of 119 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 378 points)#48 (of 119 teams · 356.4 yds/g allowed · 4,633 yards)#39 (of 119 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 295 points)#35 (of 119 teams · +6.4 /g · +83 on the season)#39 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 29 taken, 24 given · +0.38 /g)#51 (of 119 teams · 18:19 /g · 3h 58m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 119 teams · -0.007 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#80 (of 119 teams · -0.006 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#49 (of 119 teams · 36% of plays successful)#71 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.128 average PPA on successful plays)#33 (of 119 teams · 0.934 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Florida State930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#59 (of 119 teams · 372.5 yds/g · 4,470 yards)#57 (of 119 teams · 25.2 pts/g · 302 points)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 283.8 yds/g allowed · 3,406 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 14.1 pts/g allowed · 169 points)#17 (of 119 teams · +11.1 /g · +133 on the season)#26 (of 119 teams · +7 on the season · 31 taken, 24 given · +0.58 /g)#42 (of 119 teams · 18:28 /g · 3h 42m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 (of 119 teams · -0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.149 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#58 (of 119 teams · 35% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 27% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#86 (of 119 teams · 0.951 average PPA on successful plays)#114 (of 119 teams · 1.196 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Wisconsin930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#90 (of 119 teams · 328.1 yds/g · 3,937 yards)#98 (of 119 teams · 20.8 pts/g · 249 points)#12 (of 119 teams · 291.3 yds/g allowed · 3,495 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 15.4 pts/g allowed · 185 points)#37 (of 119 teams · +5.3 /g · +64 on the season)#57 (of 119 teams · +0 on the season · 23 taken, 23 given · +0.00 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:30 /g · 4h 06m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 119 teams · -0.079 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#30 (of 119 teams · -0.090 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#68 (of 119 teams · 34% of plays successful)#26 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#52 (of 119 teams · 1.010 average PPA on successful plays)#62 (of 119 teams · 0.990 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Virginia840 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#22 (of 119 teams · 423.4 yds/g · 5,081 yards)#27 (of 119 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 363 points)#22 (of 119 teams · 313.3 yds/g allowed · 3,760 yards)#18 (of 119 teams · 17.7 pts/g allowed · 212 points)#14 (of 119 teams · +12.6 /g · +151 on the season)#42 (of 119 teams · +4 on the season · 16 taken, 12 given · +0.33 /g)#23 (of 119 teams · 19:00 /g · 3h 48m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.090 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#68 (of 119 teams · -0.028 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#56 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 119 teams · 0.968 average PPA on successful plays)#87 (of 119 teams · 1.035 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Pittsburgh840 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#70 (of 119 teams · 357.8 yds/g · 4,294 yards)#48 (of 119 teams · 27.1 pts/g · 325 points)#82 (of 119 teams · 395.4 yds/g allowed · 4,745 yards)#45 (of 119 teams · 24.0 pts/g allowed · 288 points)#45 (of 119 teams · +3.1 /g · +37 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +15 on the season · 28 taken, 13 given · +1.25 /g)#27 (of 119 teams · 18:50 /g · 3h 46m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 119 teams · -0.039 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 119 teams · -0.081 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#66 (of 119 teams · 34% of plays successful)#46 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#16 (of 119 teams · 1.092 average PPA on successful plays)#91 (of 119 teams · 1.042 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Florida750 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#20 (of 119 teams · 426.9 yds/g · 5,123 yards)#19 (of 119 teams · 31.8 pts/g · 382 points)#46 (of 119 teams · 345.6 yds/g allowed · 4,147 yards)#33 (of 119 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 253 points)#18 (of 119 teams · +10.8 /g · +129 on the season)#42 (of 119 teams · +4 on the season · 25 taken, 21 given · +0.33 /g)#95 (of 119 teams · 17:08 /g · 3h 26m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 119 teams · 0.032 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#81 (of 119 teams · -0.006 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#12 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#65 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#53 (of 119 teams · 1.008 average PPA on successful plays)#47 (of 119 teams · 0.961 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Arizona State930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#15 (of 119 teams · 435.4 yds/g · 5,225 yards)#32 (of 119 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 358 points)#51 (of 119 teams · 358.9 yds/g allowed · 4,307 yards)#49 (of 119 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 294 points)#37 (of 119 teams · +5.3 /g · +64 on the season)#51 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 29 taken, 27 given · +0.17 /g)#35 (of 119 teams · 18:39 /g · 3h 44m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 119 teams · -0.072 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#45 (of 119 teams · -0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#56 (of 119 teams · 35% of plays successful)#42 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#18 (of 119 teams · 1.086 average PPA on successful plays)#89 (of 119 teams · 1.036 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Texas A&M750 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#19 (of 119 teams · 428.4 yds/g · 5,141 yards)#43 (of 119 teams · 28.4 pts/g · 341 points)#69 (of 119 teams · 386.8 yds/g allowed · 4,641 yards)#48 (of 119 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 292 points)#43 (of 119 teams · +4.1 /g · +49 on the season)#13 (of 119 teams · +10 on the season · 23 taken, 13 given · +0.83 /g)#102 (of 119 teams · 16:47 /g · 3h 21m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 119 teams · 0.042 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#44 (of 119 teams · -0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#19 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#83 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#23 (of 119 teams · 1.076 average PPA on successful plays)#17 (of 119 teams · 0.892 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Boston College930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#45 (of 119 teams · 385.4 yds/g · 4,625 yards)#62 (of 119 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 296 points)#34 (of 119 teams · 332.8 yds/g allowed · 3,994 yards)#12 (of 119 teams · 16.9 pts/g allowed · 203 points)#28 (of 119 teams · +7.8 /g · +93 on the season)#63 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 22 taken, 23 given · -0.08 /g)#40 (of 119 teams · 18:30 /g · 3h 42m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 119 teams · -0.022 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#34 (of 119 teams · -0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#54 (of 119 teams · 35% of plays successful)#50 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 119 teams · 1.036 average PPA on successful plays)#56 (of 119 teams · 0.981 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Texas Tech840 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 491.7 yds/g · 5,900 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 36.2 pts/g · 434 points)#49 (of 119 teams · 357.0 yds/g allowed · 4,284 yards)#68 (of 119 teams · 26.2 pts/g allowed · 314 points)#20 (of 119 teams · +10.0 /g · +120 on the season)#87 (of 119 teams · -5 on the season · 21 taken, 26 given · -0.42 /g)#61 (of 119 teams · 18:06 /g · 3h 37m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.070 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#59 (of 119 teams · -0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#64 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#43 (of 119 teams · 1.025 average PPA on successful plays)#19 (of 119 teams · 0.897 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Ohio State840 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#95 (of 119 teams · 320.8 yds/g · 3,850 yards)#72 (of 119 teams · 24.2 pts/g · 290 points)#33 (of 119 teams · 332.0 yds/g allowed · 3,984 yards)#20 (of 119 teams · 18.3 pts/g allowed · 219 points)#36 (of 119 teams · +5.9 /g · +71 on the season)#95 (of 119 teams · -7 on the season · 19 taken, 26 given · -0.58 /g)#69 (of 119 teams · 17:57 /g · 3h 35m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 119 teams · -0.080 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 119 teams · -0.104 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#83 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#43 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 119 teams · 1.018 average PPA on successful plays)#24 (of 119 teams · 0.900 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

AP Top 25, 20042004 New Mexico StateAP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #24
Total offense. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Louisville #1 of 119; 2004 Utah #3 of 119; 2004 Boise State #4 of 119; 2004 California #5 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #6 of 119; 2004 Texas #7 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #8 of 119; 2004 USC #11 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #15 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #19 of 119; 2004 Florida #20 of 119; 2004 Virginia #22 of 119; 2004 Auburn #24 of 119; 2004 Georgia #30 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #33 of 119; 2004 LSU #37 of 119; 2004 Michigan #44 of 119; 2004 Boston College #45 of 119; 2004 Florida State #59 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #63 of 119; 2004 Miami #64 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #70 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #90 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #95 of 119; 2004 Iowa #97 of 119. Marked: 2004 New Mexico State, ranked 56 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 24.
Scoring offensemedian #25
Scoring offense. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Louisville #1 of 119; 2004 Boise State #2 of 119; 2004 Utah #3 of 119; 2004 USC #6 of 119; 2004 California #7 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #8 of 119; 2004 Texas #12 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #14 of 119; 2004 Auburn #18 of 119; 2004 Florida #19 of 119; 2004 Miami #21 of 119; 2004 Michigan #24 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #25 of 119; 2004 Virginia #27 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #32 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #39 of 119; 2004 LSU #41 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #43 of 119; 2004 Georgia #45 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #48 of 119; 2004 Florida State #57 of 119; 2004 Boston College #62 of 119; 2004 Iowa #69 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #72 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #98 of 119. Marked: 2004 New Mexico State, ranked 60 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 25.
Total defensemedian #28
Total defense. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 LSU #5 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #7 of 119; 2004 Auburn #8 of 119; 2004 USC #9 of 119; 2004 Florida State #10 of 119; 2004 Georgia #11 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #12 of 119; 2004 Iowa #13 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #15 of 119; 2004 Louisville #18 of 119; 2004 Virginia #22 of 119; 2004 Texas #27 of 119; 2004 California #28 of 119; 2004 Miami #31 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #33 of 119; 2004 Boston College #34 of 119; 2004 Michigan #36 of 119; 2004 Utah #43 of 119; 2004 Florida #46 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #48 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #49 of 119; 2004 Boise State #50 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #51 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #69 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #82 of 119. Marked: 2004 New Mexico State, ranked 98 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 28.
Scoring defensemedian #18
Scoring defense. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Auburn #1 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #2 of 119; 2004 USC #3 of 119; 2004 Florida State #4 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #6 of 119; 2004 California #8 of 119; 2004 Georgia #9 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #11 of 119; 2004 Boston College #12 of 119; 2004 Miami #13 of 119; 2004 LSU #15 of 119; 2004 Iowa #17 of 119; 2004 Virginia #18 of 119; 2004 Texas #19 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #20 of 119; 2004 Utah #23 of 119; 2004 Louisville #25 of 119; 2004 Florida #33 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #39 of 119; 2004 Michigan #43 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #45 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #48 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #49 of 119; 2004 Boise State #65 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #68 of 119. Marked: 2004 New Mexico State, ranked 98 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 18.
Point marginmedian #16
Point margin. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Louisville #1 of 119; 2004 Utah #2 of 119; 2004 USC #3 of 119; 2004 Boise State #4 of 119; 2004 Auburn #6 of 119; 2004 California #7 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #9 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #9 of 119; 2004 Texas #11 of 119; 2004 Miami #12 of 119; 2004 Virginia #14 of 119; 2004 LSU #15 of 119; 2004 Georgia #16 of 119; 2004 Florida State #17 of 119; 2004 Florida #18 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #20 of 119; 2004 Boston College #28 of 119; 2004 Michigan #29 of 119; 2004 Iowa #33 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #35 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #36 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #37 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #37 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #43 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #45 of 119. Marked: 2004 New Mexico State, ranked 93 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 16.
Turnover marginmedian #33
Turnover margin. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 USC #1 of 119; 2004 Miami #3 of 119; 2004 Iowa #4 of 119; 2004 Utah #6 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #6 of 119; 2004 Louisville #9 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #9 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #13 of 119; 2004 Boise State #20 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #25 of 119; 2004 Michigan #26 of 119; 2004 Florida State #26 of 119; 2004 Auburn #33 of 119; 2004 Texas #36 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #39 of 119; 2004 Virginia #42 of 119; 2004 Florida #42 of 119; 2004 California #51 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #51 of 119; 2004 Georgia #57 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #57 of 119; 2004 LSU #63 of 119; 2004 Boston College #63 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #87 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #95 of 119. Marked: 2004 New Mexico State, ranked 44 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 33.
Possessionmedian #23
Possession. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Wisconsin #2 of 119; 2004 California #4 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #5 of 119; 2004 Boise State #6 of 119; 2004 Texas #8 of 119; 2004 Auburn #9 of 119; 2004 USC #14 of 119; 2004 Iowa #17 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #18 of 119; 2004 LSU #20 of 119; 2004 Utah #21 of 119; 2004 Michigan #22 of 119; 2004 Virginia #23 of 119; 2004 Louisville #24 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #27 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #35 of 119; 2004 Boston College #40 of 119; 2004 Florida State #42 of 119; 2004 Georgia #43 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #51 of 119; 2004 Miami #57 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #61 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #69 of 119; 2004 Florida #95 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #102 of 119. Marked: 2004 New Mexico State, ranked 79 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 23.
Returning passing
Returning passing. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #23
Offensive EPA. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Utah #2 of 119; 2004 California #4 of 119; 2004 Louisville #5 of 119; 2004 Virginia #6 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #8 of 119; 2004 Auburn #10 of 119; 2004 Texas #12 of 119; 2004 Boise State #13 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #15 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #17 of 119; 2004 Florida #19 of 119; 2004 Georgia #22 of 119; 2004 USC #23 of 119; 2004 LSU #24 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #28 of 119; 2004 Miami #33 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #34 of 119; 2004 Boston College #37 of 119; 2004 Michigan #40 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #46 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #58 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #61 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #62 of 119; 2004 Florida State #72 of 119; 2004 Iowa #74 of 119. Marked: 2004 New Mexico State, ranked 103 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 23.
Defensive EPAmedian #26
Defensive EPA. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Virginia Tech #2 of 119; 2004 Florida State #7 of 119; 2004 Michigan #8 of 119; 2004 Boise State #9 of 119; 2004 Louisville #10 of 119; 2004 Iowa #12 of 119; 2004 USC #16 of 119; 2004 Auburn #18 of 119; 2004 Miami #20 of 119; 2004 LSU #21 of 119; 2004 Utah #24 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #25 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #26 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #30 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #33 of 119; 2004 Boston College #34 of 119; 2004 California #36 of 119; 2004 Texas #38 of 119; 2004 Georgia #40 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #44 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #45 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #59 of 119; 2004 Virginia #68 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #80 of 119; 2004 Florida #81 of 119. Marked: 2004 New Mexico State, ranked 112 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 26.
Offensive success ratemedian #20
Offensive success rate. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Louisville #1 of 119; 2004 Utah #2 of 119; 2004 California #3 of 119; 2004 Virginia #4 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #5 of 119; 2004 Auburn #8 of 119; 2004 Texas #9 of 119; 2004 Boise State #11 of 119; 2004 Florida #12 of 119; 2004 LSU #13 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #18 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #19 of 119; 2004 USC #20 of 119; 2004 Michigan #28 of 119; 2004 Georgia #31 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #48 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #49 of 119; 2004 Boston College #54 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #56 of 119; 2004 Florida State #58 of 119; 2004 Miami #61 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #66 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #68 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #83 of 119; 2004 Iowa #92 of 119. Marked: 2004 New Mexico State, ranked 80 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 20.
Defensive success ratemedian #28
Defensive success rate. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Florida State #2 of 119; 2004 LSU #3 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #8 of 119; 2004 Auburn #10 of 119; 2004 Iowa #11 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #15 of 119; 2004 Michigan #19 of 119; 2004 California #20 of 119; 2004 USC #21 of 119; 2004 Miami #24 of 119; 2004 Georgia #25 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #26 of 119; 2004 Boise State #28 of 119; 2004 Texas #31 of 119; 2004 Louisville #34 of 119; 2004 Utah #37 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #42 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #43 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #46 of 119; 2004 Boston College #50 of 119; 2004 Virginia #56 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #64 of 119; 2004 Florida #65 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #71 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #83 of 119. Marked: 2004 New Mexico State, ranked 112 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 28.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #52
Offensive explosiveness. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Miami #8 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #10 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #16 of 119; 2004 Georgia #17 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #18 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #23 of 119; 2004 Boise State #29 of 119; 2004 Boston College #34 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #35 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #43 of 119; 2004 Iowa #46 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #47 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #52 of 119; 2004 Florida #53 of 119; 2004 Louisville #57 of 119; 2004 USC #58 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #62 of 119; 2004 Utah #69 of 119; 2004 Virginia #73 of 119; 2004 LSU #79 of 119; 2004 California #81 of 119; 2004 Auburn #82 of 119; 2004 Florida State #86 of 119; 2004 Texas #99 of 119; 2004 Michigan #104 of 119. Marked: 2004 New Mexico State, ranked 111 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 52.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #56
Defensive explosiveness. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Texas A&M #17 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #19 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #24 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #29 of 119; 2004 USC #31 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #33 of 119; 2004 Michigan #34 of 119; 2004 Iowa #37 of 119; 2004 Louisville #39 of 119; 2004 Utah #41 of 119; 2004 Florida #47 of 119; 2004 Auburn #52 of 119; 2004 Boston College #56 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #62 of 119; 2004 Boise State #65 of 119; 2004 Texas #73 of 119; 2004 Georgia #81 of 119; 2004 California #84 of 119; 2004 Miami #85 of 119; 2004 Virginia #87 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #89 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #91 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #100 of 119; 2004 LSU #102 of 119; 2004 Florida State #114 of 119. Marked: 2004 New Mexico State, ranked 26 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 56.