Metrics

New Mexico StateAggies

Season
Current

Western Athletic

Peers are the 26 teams ranked in the last regular-season AP poll of 2005, released in week 14.

AP Top 25, 2005

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2005New Mexico State0120 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#78 (of 119 teams · 344.4 yds/g · 4,133 yards)#109 (of 119 teams · 16.5 pts/g · 198 points)#118 (of 119 teams · 480.3 yds/g allowed · 5,764 yards)#116 (of 119 teams · 38.8 pts/g allowed · 465 points)#117 (of 119 teams · -22.3 /g · -267 on the season)#119 (of 119 teams · -27 on the season · 14 taken, 41 given · -2.25 /g)#107 (of 119 teams · 15:59 /g · 3h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 119 teams · -0.003 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#107 (of 119 teams · 0.145 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#104 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#110 (of 119 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#17 (of 119 teams · 1.093 average PPA on successful plays)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.843 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#44 (Total offense: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #1–#93. 5 of 26 in the top 10.)#26 (Scoring offense: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #1–#104. 7 of 26 in the top 10.)#19 (Total defense: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #1–#115. 9 of 26 in the top 10.)#15 (Scoring defense: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #1–#110. 10 of 26 in the top 10.)#14 (Point margin: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #1–#74. 10 of 26 in the top 10.)#23 (Turnover margin: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #1–#106. 5 of 26 in the top 10.)#39 (Possession: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #1–#119. 5 of 26 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#30 (Offensive EPA: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #1–#87. 4 of 26 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive EPA: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #2–#114. 4 of 26 in the top 10.)#32 (Offensive success rate: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #1–#84. 6 of 26 in the top 10.)#32 (Defensive success rate: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #2–#107. 6 of 26 in the top 10.)#60 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #24–#118. 0 of 26 in the top 10.)#85 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range #8–#116. 1 of 26 in the top 10.)
2005USC1211 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 522.5 yds/g · 6,792 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 49.1 pts/g · 638 points)#40 (of 119 teams · 339.1 yds/g allowed · 4,408 yards)#35 (of 119 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 297 points)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +26.2 /g · +341 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +22 on the season · 37 taken, 15 given · +1.69 /g)#100 (of 119 teams · 16:17 /g · 3h 32m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.244 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#89 (of 119 teams · 0.105 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 50% of plays successful)#82 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#45 (of 119 teams · 1.024 average PPA on successful plays)#85 (of 119 teams · 1.041 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Texas1301 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 512.1 yds/g · 6,657 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 50.1 pts/g · 652 points)#15 (of 119 teams · 302.9 yds/g allowed · 3,938 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 16.4 pts/g allowed · 213 points)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +33.8 /g · +439 on the season)#20 (of 119 teams · +10 on the season · 31 taken, 21 given · +0.77 /g)#28 (of 119 teams · 18:52 /g · 4h 05m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.181 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 119 teams · 0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 48% of plays successful)#21 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#67 (of 119 teams · 0.990 average PPA on successful plays)#54 (of 119 teams · 0.995 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005LSU1121 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#53 (of 119 teams · 374.1 yds/g · 4,863 yards)#43 (of 119 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 383 points)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 266.9 yds/g allowed · 3,469 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 14.2 pts/g allowed · 185 points)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +15.2 /g · +198 on the season)#100 (of 119 teams · -10 on the season · 16 taken, 26 given · -0.77 /g)#12 (of 119 teams · 19:27 /g · 4h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 119 teams · 0.116 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#30 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#63 (of 119 teams · 0.999 average PPA on successful plays)#63 (of 119 teams · 1.005 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Penn State1110 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#27 (of 119 teams · 421.5 yds/g · 5,058 yards)#13 (of 119 teams · 34.4 pts/g · 413 points)#17 (of 119 teams · 304.7 yds/g allowed · 3,656 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 17.0 pts/g allowed · 204 points)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17.4 /g · +209 on the season)#42 (of 119 teams · +4 on the season · 27 taken, 23 given · +0.33 /g)#58 (of 119 teams · 17:54 /g · 3h 35m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 119 teams · 0.112 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#28 (of 119 teams · 0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#12 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#60 (of 119 teams · 1.005 average PPA on successful plays)#71 (of 119 teams · 1.014 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Virginia Tech1120 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#51 (of 119 teams · 380.9 yds/g · 4,952 yards)#17 (of 119 teams · 33.9 pts/g · 440 points)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 247.6 yds/g allowed · 3,219 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 12.9 pts/g allowed · 168 points)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +20.9 /g · +272 on the season)#23 (of 119 teams · +9 on the season · 29 taken, 20 given · +0.69 /g)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:59 /g · 4h 20m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 119 teams · 0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#40 (of 119 teams · 0.035 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#24 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#106 (of 119 teams · 0.907 average PPA on successful plays)#106 (of 119 teams · 1.088 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Ohio State1020 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#25 (of 119 teams · 422.3 yds/g · 5,068 yards)#26 (of 119 teams · 32.7 pts/g · 392 points)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 281.3 yds/g allowed · 3,376 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 15.3 pts/g allowed · 183 points)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17.4 /g · +209 on the season)#106 (of 119 teams · -11 on the season · 13 taken, 24 given · -0.92 /g)#13 (of 119 teams · 19:24 /g · 3h 53m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 119 teams · 0.130 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#20 (of 119 teams · 0.011 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 48% of plays successful)#18 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#118 (of 119 teams · 0.814 average PPA on successful plays)#62 (of 119 teams · 1.003 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Notre Dame930 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 477.3 yds/g · 5,728 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 36.7 pts/g · 440 points)#81 (of 119 teams · 396.9 yds/g allowed · 4,763 yards)#53 (of 119 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 294 points)#16 (of 119 teams · +12.2 /g · +146 on the season)#16 (of 119 teams · +11 on the season · 25 taken, 14 given · +0.92 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:01 /g · 4h 00m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 119 teams · 0.119 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#85 (of 119 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#16 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#38 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 119 teams · 1.008 average PPA on successful plays)#116 (of 119 teams · 1.151 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Oregon1020 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#60 (of 119 teams · 360.8 yds/g · 4,330 yards)#12 (of 119 teams · 34.5 pts/g · 414 points)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 275.3 yds/g allowed · 3,303 yards)#38 (of 119 teams · 23.2 pts/g allowed · 278 points)#19 (of 119 teams · +11.3 /g · +136 on the season)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +14 on the season · 30 taken, 16 given · +1.17 /g)#115 (of 119 teams · 14:57 /g · 2h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#87 (of 119 teams · 0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#84 (of 119 teams · 36% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#36 (of 119 teams · 1.036 average PPA on successful plays)#104 (of 119 teams · 1.088 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Auburn930 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#59 (of 119 teams · 362.2 yds/g · 4,346 yards)#30 (of 119 teams · 32.2 pts/g · 386 points)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 296.9 yds/g allowed · 3,563 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 15.5 pts/g allowed · 186 points)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +16.7 /g · +200 on the season)#78 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 15 taken, 19 given · -0.33 /g)#72 (of 119 teams · 17:27 /g · 3h 29m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 119 teams · 0.109 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#70 (of 119 teams · 0.077 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#35 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#41 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 119 teams · 1.020 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 119 teams · 1.076 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Miami931 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#93 (of 119 teams · 324.2 yds/g · 3,890 yards)#55 (of 119 teams · 27.1 pts/g · 325 points)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 237.6 yds/g allowed · 2,851 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 14.3 pts/g allowed · 171 points)#15 (of 119 teams · +12.8 /g · +154 on the season)#30 (of 119 teams · +6 on the season · 31 taken, 25 given · +0.50 /g)#39 (of 119 teams · 18:26 /g · 3h 41m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 119 teams · 0.043 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#79 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#27 (of 119 teams · 1.062 average PPA on successful plays)#109 (of 119 teams · 1.112 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005UCLA1020 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#19 (of 119 teams · 431.0 yds/g · 5,172 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 39.1 pts/g · 469 points)#115 (of 119 teams · 468.1 yds/g allowed · 5,617 yards)#110 (of 119 teams · 34.2 pts/g allowed · 410 points)#42 (of 119 teams · +4.9 /g · +59 on the season)#26 (of 119 teams · +7 on the season · 24 taken, 17 given · +0.58 /g)#99 (of 119 teams · 16:20 /g · 3h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 119 teams · 0.110 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#114 (of 119 teams · 0.168 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#37 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#107 (of 119 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#35 (of 119 teams · 1.041 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 119 teams · 1.006 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005West Virginia1110 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#44 (of 119 teams · 388.9 yds/g · 4,667 yards)#31 (of 119 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 385 points)#20 (of 119 teams · 310.8 yds/g allowed · 3,729 yards)#13 (of 119 teams · 17.8 pts/g allowed · 214 points)#12 (of 119 teams · +14.3 /g · +171 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +15 on the season · 32 taken, 17 given · +1.25 /g)#27 (of 119 teams · 18:55 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 119 teams · 0.089 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 119 teams · 0.014 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#56 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#54 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 119 teams · 0.983 average PPA on successful plays)#27 (of 119 teams · 0.938 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Georgia1031 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#43 (of 119 teams · 391.1 yds/g · 5,085 yards)#42 (of 119 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 384 points)#23 (of 119 teams · 313.5 yds/g allowed · 4,075 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 16.4 pts/g allowed · 213 points)#14 (of 119 teams · +13.2 /g · +171 on the season)#13 (of 119 teams · +13 on the season · 31 taken, 18 given · +1.00 /g)#75 (of 119 teams · 17:20 /g · 3h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 119 teams · 0.108 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#76 (of 119 teams · 0.087 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#23 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#56 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#48 (of 119 teams · 1.018 average PPA on successful plays)#60 (of 119 teams · 1.000 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Alabama1020 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#62 (of 119 teams · 358.9 yds/g · 4,307 yards)#86 (of 119 teams · 21.9 pts/g · 263 points)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 255.1 yds/g allowed · 3,061 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 10.7 pts/g allowed · 128 points)#20 (of 119 teams · +11.3 /g · +135 on the season)#24 (of 119 teams · +8 on the season · 21 taken, 13 given · +0.67 /g)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:06 /g · 4h 01m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 119 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.020 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#51 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#72 (of 119 teams · 0.984 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 119 teams · 1.131 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005TCU1110 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#35 (of 119 teams · 399.9 yds/g · 4,799 yards)#22 (of 119 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 398 points)#30 (of 119 teams · 329.1 yds/g allowed · 3,949 yards)#15 (of 119 teams · 18.6 pts/g allowed · 223 points)#11 (of 119 teams · +14.6 /g · +175 on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +24 on the season · 43 taken, 19 given · +2.00 /g)#38 (of 119 teams · 18:27 /g · 3h 41m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 119 teams · 0.057 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#38 (of 119 teams · 0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#45 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#33 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#113 (of 119 teams · 0.869 average PPA on successful plays)#92 (of 119 teams · 1.058 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Louisville930 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 482.1 yds/g · 5,785 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 43.4 pts/g · 521 points)#27 (of 119 teams · 324.0 yds/g allowed · 3,888 yards)#47 (of 119 teams · 23.8 pts/g allowed · 285 points)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +19.7 /g · +236 on the season)#11 (of 119 teams · +13 on the season · 36 taken, 23 given · +1.08 /g)#103 (of 119 teams · 16:13 /g · 3h 15m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.189 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 119 teams · 0.028 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 48% of plays successful)#26 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#80 (of 119 teams · 0.972 average PPA on successful plays)#97 (of 119 teams · 1.073 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Florida931 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#54 (of 119 teams · 373.4 yds/g · 4,481 yards)#49 (of 119 teams · 28.6 pts/g · 343 points)#14 (of 119 teams · 299.8 yds/g allowed · 3,598 yards)#18 (of 119 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 226 points)#25 (of 119 teams · +9.8 /g · +117 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +18 on the season · 32 taken, 14 given · +1.50 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:58 /g · 4h 00m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 119 teams · 0.092 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 119 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#53 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#32 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 119 teams · 1.044 average PPA on successful plays)#100 (of 119 teams · 1.077 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Texas Tech930 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 495.8 yds/g · 5,950 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 39.4 pts/g · 473 points)#38 (of 119 teams · 335.8 yds/g allowed · 4,030 yards)#18 (of 119 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 226 points)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +20.6 /g · +247 on the season)#17 (of 119 teams · +10 on the season · 30 taken, 20 given · +0.83 /g)#67 (of 119 teams · 17:40 /g · 3h 32m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.219 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#34 (of 119 teams · 0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 48% of plays successful)#61 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 119 teams · 1.062 average PPA on successful plays)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.879 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Boston College930 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#45 (of 119 teams · 387.8 yds/g · 4,653 yards)#64 (of 119 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 310 points)#21 (of 119 teams · 311.7 yds/g allowed · 3,740 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 15.9 pts/g allowed · 191 points)#24 (of 119 teams · +9.9 /g · +119 on the season)#78 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 19 taken, 23 given · -0.33 /g)#93 (of 119 teams · 16:38 /g · 3h 20m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 119 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#19 (of 119 teams · 0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#32 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#31 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#108 (of 119 teams · 0.894 average PPA on successful plays)#20 (of 119 teams · 0.917 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Michigan751 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#49 (of 119 teams · 384.3 yds/g · 4,611 yards)#45 (of 119 teams · 28.8 pts/g · 345 points)#45 (of 119 teams · 345.2 yds/g allowed · 4,142 yards)#24 (of 119 teams · 20.3 pts/g allowed · 244 points)#30 (of 119 teams · +8.4 /g · +101 on the season)#37 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 26 taken, 21 given · +0.42 /g)#33 (of 119 teams · 18:41 /g · 3h 44m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 (of 119 teams · 0.047 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#78 (of 119 teams · 0.092 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#43 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#75 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#111 (of 119 teams · 0.880 average PPA on successful plays)#23 (of 119 teams · 0.924 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Wisconsin1030 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#39 (of 119 teams · 396.5 yds/g · 5,155 yards)#14 (of 119 teams · 34.3 pts/g · 446 points)#97 (of 119 teams · 417.4 yds/g allowed · 5,426 yards)#48 (of 119 teams · 23.8 pts/g allowed · 309 points)#21 (of 119 teams · +10.5 /g · +137 on the season)#14 (of 119 teams · +12 on the season · 28 taken, 16 given · +0.92 /g)#18 (of 119 teams · 19:08 /g · 4h 09m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 119 teams · 0.087 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#91 (of 119 teams · 0.111 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#47 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#73 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#54 (of 119 teams · 1.010 average PPA on successful plays)#57 (of 119 teams · 0.997 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Clemson840 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#70 (of 119 teams · 353.1 yds/g · 4,237 yards)#61 (of 119 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 316 points)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 287.7 yds/g allowed · 3,452 yards)#11 (of 119 teams · 17.6 pts/g allowed · 211 points)#29 (of 119 teams · +8.8 /g · +105 on the season)#24 (of 119 teams · +8 on the season · 25 taken, 17 given · +0.67 /g)#41 (of 119 teams · 18:24 /g · 3h 41m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 119 teams · 0.096 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#48 (of 119 teams · 0.044 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#25 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#43 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#115 (of 119 teams · 0.863 average PPA on successful plays)#86 (of 119 teams · 1.041 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Florida State851 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#88 (of 119 teams · 328.4 yds/g · 4,269 yards)#44 (of 119 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 376 points)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 262.1 yds/g allowed · 3,407 yards)#28 (of 119 teams · 22.0 pts/g allowed · 286 points)#32 (of 119 teams · +6.9 /g · +90 on the season)#66 (of 119 teams · -2 on the season · 21 taken, 23 given · -0.15 /g)#119 (of 119 teams · 13:41 /g · 2h 58m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#70 (of 119 teams · 0.037 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#16 (of 119 teams · 0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#70 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#31 (of 119 teams · 1.049 average PPA on successful plays)#91 (of 119 teams · 1.056 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Fresno State850 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#50 (of 119 teams · 384.1 yds/g · 4,994 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 37.8 pts/g · 491 points)#19 (of 119 teams · 309.1 yds/g allowed · 4,018 yards)#32 (of 119 teams · 22.5 pts/g allowed · 292 points)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +15.3 /g · +199 on the season)#86 (of 119 teams · -5 on the season · 20 taken, 25 given · -0.38 /g)#96 (of 119 teams · 16:28 /g · 3h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 119 teams · 0.128 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#50 (of 119 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#39 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#51 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#24 (of 119 teams · 1.063 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 119 teams · 1.006 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Georgia Tech750 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#74 (of 119 teams · 349.0 yds/g · 4,188 yards)#104 (of 119 teams · 18.5 pts/g · 222 points)#26 (of 119 teams · 317.5 yds/g allowed · 3,810 yards)#23 (of 119 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 241 points)#74 (of 119 teams · -1.6 /g · -19 on the season)#11 (of 119 teams · +13 on the season · 32 taken, 19 given · +1.08 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:51 /g · 3h 58m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 (of 119 teams · 0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#29 (of 119 teams · 0.018 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#80 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#15 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#62 (of 119 teams · 1.000 average PPA on successful plays)#102 (of 119 teams · 1.085 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Iowa750 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 26 teams in 2005's final AP poll. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#18 (of 119 teams · 432.4 yds/g · 5,189 yards)#36 (of 119 teams · 30.0 pts/g · 360 points)#73 (of 119 teams · 382.7 yds/g allowed · 4,592 yards)#22 (of 119 teams · 20.0 pts/g allowed · 240 points)#23 (of 119 teams · +10.0 /g · +120 on the season)#67 (of 119 teams · -2 on the season · 16 taken, 18 given · -0.17 /g)#105 (of 119 teams · 16:04 /g · 3h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 119 teams · 0.113 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#73 (of 119 teams · 0.080 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 47% of plays successful)#55 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#110 (of 119 teams · 0.883 average PPA on successful plays)#87 (of 119 teams · 1.045 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

AP Top 25, 20052005 New Mexico StateAP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #44
Total offense. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 USC #1 of 119; 2005 Texas #3 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #5 of 119; 2005 Louisville #7 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #8 of 119; 2005 Iowa #18 of 119; 2005 UCLA #19 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #25 of 119; 2005 Penn State #27 of 119; 2005 TCU #35 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #39 of 119; 2005 Georgia #43 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #44 of 119; 2005 Boston College #45 of 119; 2005 Michigan #49 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #50 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #51 of 119; 2005 LSU #53 of 119; 2005 Florida #54 of 119; 2005 Auburn #59 of 119; 2005 Oregon #60 of 119; 2005 Alabama #62 of 119; 2005 Clemson #70 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #74 of 119; 2005 Florida State #88 of 119; 2005 Miami #93 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 78 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 44.
Scoring offensemedian #26
Scoring offense. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Texas #1 of 119; 2005 USC #2 of 119; 2005 Louisville #3 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #4 of 119; 2005 UCLA #5 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #6 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #8 of 119; 2005 Oregon #12 of 119; 2005 Penn State #13 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #14 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #17 of 119; 2005 TCU #22 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #26 of 119; 2005 Auburn #30 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #31 of 119; 2005 Iowa #36 of 119; 2005 Georgia #42 of 119; 2005 LSU #43 of 119; 2005 Florida State #44 of 119; 2005 Michigan #45 of 119; 2005 Florida #49 of 119; 2005 Miami #55 of 119; 2005 Clemson #61 of 119; 2005 Boston College #64 of 119; 2005 Alabama #86 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #104 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 109 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 26.
Total defensemedian #19
Total defense. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Miami #1 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #2 of 119; 2005 Alabama #3 of 119; 2005 Florida State #4 of 119; 2005 LSU #5 of 119; 2005 Oregon #6 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #8 of 119; 2005 Clemson #9 of 119; 2005 Auburn #10 of 119; 2005 Florida #14 of 119; 2005 Texas #15 of 119; 2005 Penn State #17 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #19 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #20 of 119; 2005 Boston College #21 of 119; 2005 Georgia #23 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #26 of 119; 2005 Louisville #27 of 119; 2005 TCU #30 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #38 of 119; 2005 USC #40 of 119; 2005 Michigan #45 of 119; 2005 Iowa #73 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #81 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #97 of 119; 2005 UCLA #115 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 118 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 19.
Scoring defensemedian #15
Scoring defense. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Alabama #1 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #2 of 119; 2005 LSU #3 of 119; 2005 Miami #4 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #5 of 119; 2005 Auburn #6 of 119; 2005 Boston College #7 of 119; 2005 Texas #8 of 119; 2005 Georgia #8 of 119; 2005 Penn State #10 of 119; 2005 Clemson #11 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #13 of 119; 2005 TCU #15 of 119; 2005 Florida #18 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #18 of 119; 2005 Iowa #22 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #23 of 119; 2005 Michigan #24 of 119; 2005 Florida State #28 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #32 of 119; 2005 USC #35 of 119; 2005 Oregon #38 of 119; 2005 Louisville #47 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #48 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #53 of 119; 2005 UCLA #110 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 116 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 15.
Point marginmedian #14
Point margin. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Texas #1 of 119; 2005 USC #2 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #3 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #4 of 119; 2005 Louisville #5 of 119; 2005 Penn State #6 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #6 of 119; 2005 Auburn #8 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #9 of 119; 2005 LSU #10 of 119; 2005 TCU #11 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #12 of 119; 2005 Georgia #14 of 119; 2005 Miami #15 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #16 of 119; 2005 Oregon #19 of 119; 2005 Alabama #20 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #21 of 119; 2005 Iowa #23 of 119; 2005 Boston College #24 of 119; 2005 Florida #25 of 119; 2005 Clemson #29 of 119; 2005 Michigan #30 of 119; 2005 Florida State #32 of 119; 2005 UCLA #42 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #74 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 117 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 14.
Turnover marginmedian #23
Turnover margin. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 TCU #1 of 119; 2005 USC #2 of 119; 2005 Florida #3 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #7 of 119; 2005 Oregon #8 of 119; 2005 Louisville #11 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #11 of 119; 2005 Georgia #13 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #14 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #16 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #17 of 119; 2005 Texas #20 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #23 of 119; 2005 Alabama #24 of 119; 2005 Clemson #24 of 119; 2005 UCLA #26 of 119; 2005 Miami #30 of 119; 2005 Michigan #37 of 119; 2005 Penn State #42 of 119; 2005 Florida State #66 of 119; 2005 Iowa #67 of 119; 2005 Auburn #78 of 119; 2005 Boston College #78 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #86 of 119; 2005 LSU #100 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #106 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 119 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 23.
Possessionmedian #39
Possession. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Alabama #1 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #2 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #3 of 119; 2005 Florida #4 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #6 of 119; 2005 LSU #12 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #13 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #18 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #27 of 119; 2005 Texas #28 of 119; 2005 Michigan #33 of 119; 2005 TCU #38 of 119; 2005 Miami #39 of 119; 2005 Clemson #41 of 119; 2005 Penn State #58 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #67 of 119; 2005 Auburn #72 of 119; 2005 Georgia #75 of 119; 2005 Boston College #93 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #96 of 119; 2005 UCLA #99 of 119; 2005 USC #100 of 119; 2005 Louisville #103 of 119; 2005 Iowa #105 of 119; 2005 Oregon #115 of 119; 2005 Florida State #119 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 107 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 39.
Returning passing
Returning passing. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #30
Offensive EPA. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 USC #1 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #2 of 119; 2005 Louisville #5 of 119; 2005 Texas #6 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #16 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #19 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #23 of 119; 2005 LSU #24 of 119; 2005 Iowa #25 of 119; 2005 Penn State #26 of 119; 2005 UCLA #28 of 119; 2005 Auburn #29 of 119; 2005 Georgia #30 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #36 of 119; 2005 Clemson #37 of 119; 2005 Florida #39 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #41 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #42 of 119; 2005 Boston College #46 of 119; 2005 Alabama #52 of 119; 2005 TCU #55 of 119; 2005 Michigan #63 of 119; 2005 Miami #65 of 119; 2005 Florida State #70 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #73 of 119; 2005 Oregon #87 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 99 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 30.
Defensive EPAmedian #35
Defensive EPA. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Oregon #2 of 119; 2005 Miami #6 of 119; 2005 Alabama #7 of 119; 2005 LSU #9 of 119; 2005 Florida State #16 of 119; 2005 Boston College #19 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #20 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #23 of 119; 2005 Penn State #28 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #29 of 119; 2005 Florida #33 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #34 of 119; 2005 Louisville #35 of 119; 2005 Texas #37 of 119; 2005 TCU #38 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #40 of 119; 2005 Clemson #48 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #50 of 119; 2005 Auburn #70 of 119; 2005 Iowa #73 of 119; 2005 Georgia #76 of 119; 2005 Michigan #78 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #85 of 119; 2005 USC #89 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #91 of 119; 2005 UCLA #114 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 107 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 35.
Offensive success ratemedian #32
Offensive success rate. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 USC #1 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #2 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #3 of 119; 2005 Louisville #4 of 119; 2005 Texas #5 of 119; 2005 Iowa #8 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #16 of 119; 2005 Penn State #18 of 119; 2005 Georgia #23 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #24 of 119; 2005 Clemson #25 of 119; 2005 LSU #30 of 119; 2005 Boston College #32 of 119; 2005 Auburn #35 of 119; 2005 UCLA #37 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #39 of 119; 2005 Michigan #43 of 119; 2005 TCU #45 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #47 of 119; 2005 Alabama #51 of 119; 2005 Florida #53 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #56 of 119; 2005 Florida State #70 of 119; 2005 Miami #79 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #80 of 119; 2005 Oregon #84 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 104 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 32.
Defensive success ratemedian #32
Defensive success rate. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Oregon #2 of 119; 2005 Alabama #4 of 119; 2005 Miami #5 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #8 of 119; 2005 LSU #9 of 119; 2005 Florida State #10 of 119; 2005 Penn State #12 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #15 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #18 of 119; 2005 Texas #21 of 119; 2005 Louisville #26 of 119; 2005 Boston College #31 of 119; 2005 Florida #32 of 119; 2005 TCU #33 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #38 of 119; 2005 Auburn #41 of 119; 2005 Clemson #43 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #51 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #54 of 119; 2005 Iowa #55 of 119; 2005 Georgia #56 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #61 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #73 of 119; 2005 Michigan #75 of 119; 2005 USC #82 of 119; 2005 UCLA #107 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 110 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 32.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #60
Offensive explosiveness. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Fresno State #24 of 119; 2005 Texas Tech #25 of 119; 2005 Miami #27 of 119; 2005 Florida State #31 of 119; 2005 Florida #34 of 119; 2005 UCLA #35 of 119; 2005 Oregon #36 of 119; 2005 USC #45 of 119; 2005 Auburn #47 of 119; 2005 Georgia #48 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #54 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #57 of 119; 2005 Penn State #60 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #62 of 119; 2005 LSU #63 of 119; 2005 Texas #67 of 119; 2005 Alabama #72 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #73 of 119; 2005 Louisville #80 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #106 of 119; 2005 Boston College #108 of 119; 2005 Iowa #110 of 119; 2005 Michigan #111 of 119; 2005 TCU #113 of 119; 2005 Clemson #115 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #118 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 17 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 60.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #85
Defensive explosiveness. AP Top 25, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Texas Tech #8 of 119; 2005 Boston College #20 of 119; 2005 Michigan #23 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #27 of 119; 2005 Texas #54 of 119; 2005 Wisconsin #57 of 119; 2005 Georgia #60 of 119; 2005 Ohio State #62 of 119; 2005 LSU #63 of 119; 2005 UCLA #65 of 119; 2005 Fresno State #67 of 119; 2005 Penn State #71 of 119; 2005 USC #85 of 119; 2005 Clemson #86 of 119; 2005 Iowa #87 of 119; 2005 Florida State #91 of 119; 2005 TCU #92 of 119; 2005 Louisville #97 of 119; 2005 Auburn #98 of 119; 2005 Florida #100 of 119; 2005 Georgia Tech #102 of 119; 2005 Oregon #104 of 119; 2005 Virginia Tech #106 of 119; 2005 Miami #109 of 119; 2005 Alabama #112 of 119; 2005 Notre Dame #116 of 119. Marked: 2005 New Mexico State, ranked 3 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 85.