Metrics

UCLABruins

Season
Current

Pac-10

Pac-10, 2008

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2008UCLA480 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#111 (of 120 teams · 283.3 yds/g · 3,399 yards)#109 (of 120 teams · 17.7 pts/g · 212 points)#49 (of 120 teams · 337.4 yds/g allowed · 4,049 yards)#86 (of 120 teams · 29.0 pts/g allowed · 348 points)#107 (of 120 teams · -11.3 /g · -136 on the season)#109 (of 120 teams · -12 on the season · 20 taken, 32 given · -1.00 /g)#90 (of 120 teams · 17:26 /g · 3h 29m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#108 (of 120 teams · -0.040 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#20 (of 120 teams · -0.023 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#85 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#35 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#117 (of 120 teams · 0.761 average PPA on successful plays)#70 (of 120 teams · 0.916 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Pac-10 teams in 20080 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#47 (Total offense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range #7–#118. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#32 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range #7–#119. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#45 (Total defense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range #2–#111. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#47 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range #1–#119. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#30 (Point margin: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range #2–#120. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#30 (Turnover margin: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range #5–#119. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#83 (Possession: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range #14–#119. 0 of 10 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#60 (Offensive EPA: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range #9–#119. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#28 (Defensive EPA: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range #1–#116. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#62 (Offensive success rate: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range #10–#119. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive success rate: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range #2–#120. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#48 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range #11–#117. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#42 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range #10–#90. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)
2008Arizona850 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#33 (of 120 teams · 402.4 yds/g · 5,231 yards)#16 (of 120 teams · 36.6 pts/g · 476 points)#25 (of 120 teams · 313.0 yds/g allowed · 4,069 yards)#33 (of 120 teams · 21.3 pts/g allowed · 277 points)#13 (of 120 teams · +15.3 /g · +199 on the season)#24 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 28 taken, 21 given · +0.54 /g)#38 (of 120 teams · 18:47 /g · 4h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.054 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#64 (of 120 teams · 0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#57 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#63 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#81 (of 120 teams · 0.884 average PPA on successful plays)#18 (of 120 teams · 0.838 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Arizona State570 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#99 (of 120 teams · 309.4 yds/g · 3,713 yards)#84 (of 120 teams · 22.8 pts/g · 274 points)#45 (of 120 teams · 335.2 yds/g allowed · 4,022 yards)#45 (of 120 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 272 points)#63 (of 120 teams · +0.2 /g · +2 on the season)#28 (of 120 teams · +6 on the season · 25 taken, 19 given · +0.50 /g)#98 (of 120 teams · 17:06 /g · 3h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#86 (of 120 teams · -0.008 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#28 (of 120 teams · -0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#83 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#50 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#101 (of 120 teams · 0.843 average PPA on successful plays)#36 (of 120 teams · 0.873 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008California941 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#47 (of 120 teams · 376.0 yds/g · 4,888 yards)#27 (of 120 teams · 32.6 pts/g · 424 points)#27 (of 120 teams · 315.2 yds/g allowed · 4,098 yards)#23 (of 120 teams · 19.9 pts/g allowed · 259 points)#20 (of 120 teams · +12.7 /g · +165 on the season)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +18 on the season · 37 taken, 19 given · +1.38 /g)#83 (of 120 teams · 17:36 /g · 3h 49m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#87 (of 120 teams · -0.009 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.053 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#95 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#19 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#26 (of 120 teams · 0.966 average PPA on successful plays)#42 (of 120 teams · 0.884 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Oregon1030 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 484.9 yds/g · 6,303 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 41.9 pts/g · 545 points)#84 (of 120 teams · 389.6 yds/g allowed · 5,065 yards)#79 (of 120 teams · 28.2 pts/g allowed · 367 points)#16 (of 120 teams · +13.7 /g · +178 on the season)#30 (of 120 teams · +6 on the season · 32 taken, 26 given · +0.46 /g)#119 (of 120 teams · 15:27 /g · 3h 21m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 120 teams · 0.036 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 120 teams · -0.016 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#62 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#18 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#11 (of 120 teams · 1.005 average PPA on successful plays)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.945 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Oregon State940 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#29 (of 120 teams · 407.1 yds/g · 5,292 yards)#32 (of 120 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 397 points)#24 (of 120 teams · 312.1 yds/g allowed · 4,058 yards)#47 (of 120 teams · 23.1 pts/g allowed · 300 points)#30 (of 120 teams · +7.5 /g · +97 on the season)#54 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 24 taken, 23 given · +0.08 /g)#14 (of 120 teams · 19:22 /g · 4h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 120 teams · -0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#36 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#14 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#76 (of 120 teams · 0.893 average PPA on successful plays)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.954 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Stanford570 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#65 (of 120 teams · 351.8 yds/g · 4,221 yards)#54 (of 120 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 315 points)#76 (of 120 teams · 379.6 yds/g allowed · 4,555 yards)#72 (of 120 teams · 27.4 pts/g allowed · 329 points)#73 (of 120 teams · -1.2 /g · -14 on the season)#74 (of 120 teams · -2 on the season · 24 taken, 26 given · -0.17 /g)#68 (of 120 teams · 18:09 /g · 3h 38m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 120 teams · 0.045 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#99 (of 120 teams · 0.085 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#46 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#92 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#79 (of 120 teams · 0.886 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 120 teams · 0.910 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008USC1214 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#11 (of 120 teams · 454.7 yds/g · 5,911 yards)#14 (of 120 teams · 37.5 pts/g · 488 points)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 221.8 yds/g allowed · 2,883 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 9.0 pts/g allowed · 117 points)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +28.5 /g · +371 on the season)#24 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 31 taken, 24 given · +0.54 /g)#24 (of 120 teams · 19:08 /g · 4h 09m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.144 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.106 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 47% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#27 (of 120 teams · 0.965 average PPA on successful plays)#13 (of 120 teams · 0.827 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Washington0120 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#116 (of 120 teams · 263.2 yds/g · 3,158 yards)#118 (of 120 teams · 13.3 pts/g · 159 points)#111 (of 120 teams · 451.8 yds/g allowed · 5,421 yards)#117 (of 120 teams · 38.6 pts/g allowed · 463 points)#118 (of 120 teams · -25.3 /g · -304 on the season)#118 (of 120 teams · -20 on the season · 10 taken, 30 given · -1.67 /g)#94 (of 120 teams · 17:08 /g · 3h 26m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#111 (of 120 teams · -0.043 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#116 (of 120 teams · 0.118 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#114 (of 120 teams · 34% of plays successful)#120 (of 120 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 120 teams · 0.990 average PPA on successful plays)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.816 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Washington State2110 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2008. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#118 (of 120 teams · 241.1 yds/g · 3,134 yards)#119 (of 120 teams · 12.7 pts/g · 165 points)#109 (of 120 teams · 443.4 yds/g allowed · 5,764 yards)#119 (of 120 teams · 43.9 pts/g allowed · 570 points)#120 (of 120 teams · -31.1 /g · -405 on the season)#119 (of 120 teams · -27 on the season · 13 taken, 40 given · -2.08 /g)#106 (of 120 teams · 16:52 /g · 3h 39m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#119 (of 120 teams · -0.084 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#94 (of 120 teams · 0.081 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#119 (of 120 teams · 32% of plays successful)#88 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#48 (of 120 teams · 0.927 average PPA on successful plays)#56 (of 120 teams · 0.899 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Pac-10, 20082008 UCLAPac-10 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #47
Total offense. Pac-10, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Oregon #7 of 120; 2008 USC #11 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #29 of 120; 2008 Arizona #33 of 120; 2008 California #47 of 120; 2008 Stanford #65 of 120; 2008 Arizona State #99 of 120; 2008 Washington #116 of 120; 2008 Washington State #118 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCLA, ranked 111 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 47.
Scoring offensemedian #32
Scoring offense. Pac-10, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Oregon #7 of 120; 2008 USC #14 of 120; 2008 Arizona #16 of 120; 2008 California #27 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #32 of 120; 2008 Stanford #54 of 120; 2008 Arizona State #84 of 120; 2008 Washington #118 of 120; 2008 Washington State #119 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCLA, ranked 109 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 32.
Total defensemedian #45
Total defense. Pac-10, 2008, best rank first: 2008 USC #2 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #24 of 120; 2008 Arizona #25 of 120; 2008 California #27 of 120; 2008 Arizona State #45 of 120; 2008 Stanford #76 of 120; 2008 Oregon #84 of 120; 2008 Washington State #109 of 120; 2008 Washington #111 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCLA, ranked 49 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 45.
Scoring defensemedian #47
Scoring defense. Pac-10, 2008, best rank first: 2008 USC #1 of 120; 2008 California #23 of 120; 2008 Arizona #33 of 120; 2008 Arizona State #45 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #47 of 120; 2008 Stanford #72 of 120; 2008 Oregon #79 of 120; 2008 Washington #117 of 120; 2008 Washington State #119 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCLA, ranked 86 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 47.
Point marginmedian #30
Point margin. Pac-10, 2008, best rank first: 2008 USC #2 of 120; 2008 Arizona #13 of 120; 2008 Oregon #16 of 120; 2008 California #20 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #30 of 120; 2008 Arizona State #63 of 120; 2008 Stanford #73 of 120; 2008 Washington #118 of 120; 2008 Washington State #120 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCLA, ranked 107 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 30.
Turnover marginmedian #30
Turnover margin. Pac-10, 2008, best rank first: 2008 California #5 of 120; 2008 Arizona #24 of 120; 2008 USC #24 of 120; 2008 Arizona State #28 of 120; 2008 Oregon #30 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #54 of 120; 2008 Stanford #74 of 120; 2008 Washington #118 of 120; 2008 Washington State #119 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCLA, ranked 109 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 30.
Possessionmedian #83
Possession. Pac-10, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Oregon State #14 of 120; 2008 USC #24 of 120; 2008 Arizona #38 of 120; 2008 Stanford #68 of 120; 2008 California #83 of 120; 2008 Washington #94 of 120; 2008 Arizona State #98 of 120; 2008 Washington State #106 of 120; 2008 Oregon #119 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCLA, ranked 90 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 83.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Pac-10, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 UCLA, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Pac-10, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 UCLA, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Pac-10, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 UCLA, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Pac-10, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 UCLA, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #60
Offensive EPA. Pac-10, 2008, best rank first: 2008 USC #9 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #39 of 120; 2008 Arizona #41 of 120; 2008 Stanford #53 of 120; 2008 Oregon #60 of 120; 2008 Arizona State #86 of 120; 2008 California #87 of 120; 2008 Washington #111 of 120; 2008 Washington State #119 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCLA, ranked 108 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 60.
Defensive EPAmedian #28
Defensive EPA. Pac-10, 2008, best rank first: 2008 USC #1 of 120; 2008 California #8 of 120; 2008 Oregon #25 of 120; 2008 Arizona State #28 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #35 of 120; 2008 Arizona #64 of 120; 2008 Washington State #94 of 120; 2008 Stanford #99 of 120; 2008 Washington #116 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCLA, ranked 20 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 28.
Offensive success ratemedian #62
Offensive success rate. Pac-10, 2008, best rank first: 2008 USC #10 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #36 of 120; 2008 Stanford #46 of 120; 2008 Arizona #57 of 120; 2008 Oregon #62 of 120; 2008 Arizona State #83 of 120; 2008 California #95 of 120; 2008 Washington #114 of 120; 2008 Washington State #119 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCLA, ranked 85 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 62.
Defensive success ratemedian #35
Defensive success rate. Pac-10, 2008, best rank first: 2008 USC #2 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #14 of 120; 2008 Oregon #18 of 120; 2008 California #19 of 120; 2008 Arizona State #50 of 120; 2008 Arizona #63 of 120; 2008 Washington State #88 of 120; 2008 Stanford #92 of 120; 2008 Washington #120 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCLA, ranked 35 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 35.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #48
Offensive explosiveness. Pac-10, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Oregon #11 of 120; 2008 Washington #15 of 120; 2008 California #26 of 120; 2008 USC #27 of 120; 2008 Washington State #48 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #76 of 120; 2008 Stanford #79 of 120; 2008 Arizona #81 of 120; 2008 Arizona State #101 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCLA, ranked 117 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 48.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #42
Defensive explosiveness. Pac-10, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Washington #10 of 120; 2008 USC #13 of 120; 2008 Arizona #18 of 120; 2008 Arizona State #36 of 120; 2008 California #42 of 120; 2008 Washington State #56 of 120; 2008 Stanford #67 of 120; 2008 Oregon #87 of 120; 2008 Oregon State #90 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCLA, ranked 70 of 120. Pac-10 median rank 42.