| 2009 | UCLA7–6 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #88 (of 120 teams · 337.4 yds/g · 4,386 yards) | #94 (of 120 teams · 22.0 pts/g · 286 points) | #32 (of 120 teams · 334.0 yds/g allowed · 4,342 yards) | #27 (of 120 teams · 21.2 pts/g allowed · 276 points) | #66 (of 120 teams · +0.8 /g · +10 on the season) | #26 (of 120 teams · +6 on the season · 30 taken, 24 given · +0.46 /g) | #98 (of 120 teams · 17:33 /g · 3h 48m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing production returning) | — (— of last season's receiving production returning) | — (— of last season's rushing production returning) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #89 (of 120 teams · 0.017 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #22 (of 120 teams · -0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #72 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful) | #58 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #65 (of 120 teams · 0.915 average PPA on successful plays) | #13 (of 120 teams · 0.835 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| Median | of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | #55 (Total offense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range #19–#119. 0 of 10 in the top 10.) | #61 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range #8–#119. 1 of 10 in the top 10.) | #40 (Total defense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range #13–#120. 0 of 10 in the top 10.) | #53 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range #22–#118. 0 of 10 in the top 10.) | #50 (Point margin: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range #16–#120. 0 of 10 in the top 10.) | #52 (Turnover margin: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range #26–#102. 0 of 10 in the top 10.) | #66 (Possession: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range #10–#119. 1 of 10 in the top 10.) | — (No team has a rank for this) | — (No team has a rank for this) | — (No team has a rank for this) | — (No team has a rank for this) | #35 (Offensive EPA: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range #6–#119. 1 of 10 in the top 10.) | #35 (Defensive EPA: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range #19–#118. 0 of 10 in the top 10.) | #43 (Offensive success rate: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range #12–#120. 0 of 10 in the top 10.) | #58 (Defensive success rate: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range #8–#120. 1 of 10 in the top 10.) | #36 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range #7–#101. 1 of 10 in the top 10.) | #74 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range #13–#105. 0 of 10 in the top 10.) |
| 2009 | Arizona8–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #58 (of 120 teams · 384.5 yds/g · 4,999 yards) | #61 (of 120 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 356 points) | #25 (of 120 teams · 322.2 yds/g allowed · 4,189 yards) | #53 (of 120 teams · 23.9 pts/g allowed · 311 points) | #54 (of 120 teams · +3.5 /g · +45 on the season) | #68 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 19 taken, 20 given · -0.08 /g) | #45 (of 120 teams · 19:01 /g · 4h 07m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing production returning) | — (— of last season's receiving production returning) | — (— of last season's rushing production returning) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #62 (of 120 teams · 0.043 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #35 (of 120 teams · 0.007 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #43 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful) | #33 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #101 (of 120 teams · 0.861 average PPA on successful plays) | #43 (of 120 teams · 0.900 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2009 | Arizona State4–8 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #90 (of 120 teams · 334.4 yds/g · 4,013 yards) | #91 (of 120 teams · 22.3 pts/g · 268 points) | #13 (of 120 teams · 297.6 yds/g allowed · 3,571 yards) | #26 (of 120 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 253 points) | #63 (of 120 teams · +1.3 /g · +15 on the season) | #72 (of 120 teams · -2 on the season · 24 taken, 26 given · -0.17 /g) | #42 (of 120 teams · 19:10 /g · 3h 50m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing production returning) | — (— of last season's receiving production returning) | — (— of last season's rushing production returning) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #93 (of 120 teams · 0.008 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #19 (of 120 teams · -0.024 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #99 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful) | #8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #96 (of 120 teams · 0.867 average PPA on successful plays) | #77 (of 120 teams · 0.944 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2009 | California8–5 | 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #49 (of 120 teams · 392.1 yds/g · 5,098 yards) | #48 (of 120 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 378 points) | #72 (of 120 teams · 378.9 yds/g allowed · 4,925 yards) | #60 (of 120 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 331 points) | #50 (of 120 teams · +3.6 /g · +47 on the season) | #37 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 21 taken, 17 given · +0.31 /g) | #86 (of 120 teams · 17:51 /g · 3h 52m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing production returning) | — (— of last season's receiving production returning) | — (— of last season's rushing production returning) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #55 (of 120 teams · 0.052 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #32 (of 120 teams · 0.003 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #81 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful) | #22 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.039 average PPA on successful plays) | #105 (of 120 teams · 1.004 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2009 | Oregon10–3 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #33 (of 120 teams · 412.0 yds/g · 5,356 yards) | #8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 36.1 pts/g · 469 points) | #35 (of 120 teams · 336.3 yds/g allowed · 4,372 yards) | #51 (of 120 teams · 23.8 pts/g allowed · 309 points) | #16 (of 120 teams · +12.3 /g · +160 on the season) | #52 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 25 taken, 23 given · +0.15 /g) | #103 (of 120 teams · 17:25 /g · 3h 46m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing production returning) | — (— of last season's receiving production returning) | — (— of last season's rushing production returning) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #29 (of 120 teams · 0.085 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #23 (of 120 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #41 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful) | #18 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #17 (of 120 teams · 0.991 average PPA on successful plays) | #78 (of 120 teams · 0.944 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2009 | Oregon State8–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #34 (of 120 teams · 410.6 yds/g · 5,338 yards) | #26 (of 120 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 409 points) | #46 (of 120 teams · 349.5 yds/g allowed · 4,543 yards) | #57 (of 120 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 325 points) | #42 (of 120 teams · +6.5 /g · +84 on the season) | #32 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 16 taken, 11 given · +0.38 /g) | #31 (of 120 teams · 19:20 /g · 4h 11m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing production returning) | — (— of last season's receiving production returning) | — (— of last season's rushing production returning) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #12 (of 120 teams · 0.115 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #90 (of 120 teams · 0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #21 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful) | #75 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #28 (of 120 teams · 0.972 average PPA on successful plays) | #98 (of 120 teams · 0.974 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2009 | Stanford8–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #19 (of 120 teams · 427.6 yds/g · 5,559 yards) | #11 (of 120 teams · 35.5 pts/g · 461 points) | #90 (of 120 teams · 402.7 yds/g allowed · 5,235 yards) | #69 (of 120 teams · 26.5 pts/g allowed · 345 points) | #27 (of 120 teams · +8.9 /g · +116 on the season) | #60 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 17 taken, 17 given · +0.00 /g) | #10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:08 /g · 4h 22m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing production returning) | — (— of last season's receiving production returning) | — (— of last season's rushing production returning) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #109 (of 120 teams · 0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #12 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful) | #105 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #27 (of 120 teams · 0.974 average PPA on successful plays) | #86 (of 120 teams · 0.955 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2009 | USC9–4 | 5 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #55 (of 120 teams · 389.1 yds/g · 5,058 yards) | #64 (of 120 teams · 26.5 pts/g · 344 points) | #40 (of 120 teams · 340.5 yds/g allowed · 4,426 yards) | #22 (of 120 teams · 19.9 pts/g allowed · 258 points) | #41 (of 120 teams · +6.6 /g · +86 on the season) | #60 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 22 taken, 22 given · +0.00 /g) | #90 (of 120 teams · 17:45 /g · 3h 51m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing production returning) | — (— of last season's receiving production returning) | — (— of last season's rushing production returning) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #28 (of 120 teams · 0.087 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #63 (of 120 teams · 0.044 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #55 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful) | #70 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #37 (of 120 teams · 0.954 average PPA on successful plays) | #70 (of 120 teams · 0.935 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2009 | Washington5–7 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #62 (of 120 teams · 375.5 yds/g · 4,506 yards) | #69 (of 120 teams · 26.1 pts/g · 313 points) | #79 (of 120 teams · 389.5 yds/g allowed · 4,674 yards) | #70 (of 120 teams · 26.7 pts/g allowed · 320 points) | #72 (of 120 teams · -0.6 /g · -7 on the season) | #36 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 23 taken, 19 given · +0.33 /g) | #66 (of 120 teams · 18:24 /g · 3h 41m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing production returning) | — (— of last season's receiving production returning) | — (— of last season's rushing production returning) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #35 (of 120 teams · 0.079 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #105 (of 120 teams · 0.122 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #42 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful) | #102 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #36 (of 120 teams · 0.958 average PPA on successful plays) | #74 (of 120 teams · 0.940 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2009 | Washington State1–11 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Pac-10 teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #119 (of 120 teams · 248.6 yds/g · 2,983 yards) | #119 (of 120 teams · 12.0 pts/g · 144 points) | #120 (of 120 teams · 512.0 yds/g allowed · 6,144 yards) | #118 (of 120 teams · 38.5 pts/g allowed · 462 points) | #120 (of 120 teams · -26.5 /g · -318 on the season) | #102 (of 120 teams · -7 on the season · 24 taken, 31 given · -0.58 /g) | #119 (of 120 teams · 15:54 /g · 3h 11m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing production returning) | — (— of last season's receiving production returning) | — (— of last season's rushing production returning) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #119 (of 120 teams · -0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #118 (of 120 teams · 0.154 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #120 (of 120 teams · 32% of plays successful) | #120 (of 120 teams · 52% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #52 (of 120 teams · 0.933 average PPA on successful plays) | #20 (of 120 teams · 0.852 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |