THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

UL MonroeWarhawks

Season
‹
›Current

Sun Belt

Peers are the 64 teams in 2018’s 5 power conferences: ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, SEC. Each figure is a team’s national rank.

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. UL Monroe played 2 such games.

Power 5, 2018

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2018UL Monroe6–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (377.5 yds/g · 755 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (15.5 pts/g · 31 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (678.0 yds/g allowed · 1,356 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (59.0 pts/g allowed · 118 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-43.5 /g · -87 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-3 in these games · 0 taken, 3 given · -1.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27:25 /g · 0h 55m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#51 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 130 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 326.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.627 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (67% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.383 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.256 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
Medianof 64 Power 5 teams in 20180 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#33 (Total offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#73. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Scoring offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#73. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#38 (Total defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#73. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Scoring defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#73. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Point margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#73. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#32 (Turnover margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #2–#73. 8 of 64 in the top 10.)#38 (Possession: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#74. 8 of 64 in the top 10.)#55 (Returning passing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#127. 5 of 64 in the top 10.)#66 (Returning receiving: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #4–#129. 3 of 64 in the top 10.)#64 (Returning rushing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#127. 5 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Team talent: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#72. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Offensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#73. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#73. 8 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Offensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#73. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#74. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#74. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range #1–#74. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)
2018Alabama14–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)5 (5 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #11 LSU, #18 Mississippi State, #19 Texas A&M, #23 Missouri · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 520.7 yds/g · 4,686 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 47.2 pts/g · 425 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 270.1 yds/g allowed · 2,431 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 14.1 pts/g allowed · 127 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +33.1 /g · +298 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +8 in these games · 17 taken, 9 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 31:03 /g · 4h 39m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 978.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.375 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 51% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 1.327 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 1.342 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Clemson15–01 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Notre Dame)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #19 Texas A&M, #20 Syracuse · postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Notre Dame)#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 534.2 yds/g · 5,342 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 46.2 pts/g · 462 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 310.1 yds/g allowed · 3,101 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 15.4 pts/g allowed · 154 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +30.8 /g · +308 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 29:04 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 893.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.362 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 1.354 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 1.282 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Georgia11–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida, #14 Kentucky, #23 Missouri)#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 453.0 yds/g · 4,077 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35.7 pts/g · 321 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 312.4 yds/g allowed · 2,812 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 19.1 pts/g allowed · 172 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +16.6 /g · +149 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 11 taken, 10 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 32:17 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 130 teams · 94% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 964.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.300 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 0.087 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 1.206 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.080 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Michigan10–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Penn State, #22 Northwestern)#21 (of 74 teams · 424.2 yds/g · 4,242 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34.8 pts/g · 348 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 262.1 yds/g allowed · 2,621 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 188 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +16.0 /g · +160 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 15 taken, 9 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35:43 /g · 5h 57m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#92 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 862.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 74 teams · 0.217 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 1.171 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.454 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Iowa9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #24 Iowa State · postseason: #18 Mississippi State)#41 (of 74 teams · 373.2 yds/g · 3,732 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 30.7 pts/g · 307 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 305.1 yds/g allowed · 3,051 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 188 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11.9 /g · +119 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +8 in these games · 20 taken, 12 given · +0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:32 /g · 5h 25m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 130 teams · 615.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 74 teams · 0.162 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.062 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 1.279 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.115 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018West Virginia8–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Texas)#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 509.5 yds/g · 5,095 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 41.3 pts/g · 413 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 414.0 yds/g allowed · 4,140 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 27.5 pts/g allowed · 275 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +13.8 /g · +138 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 20 taken, 15 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 28:42 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 130 teams · 646.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.316 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 0.192 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.383 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 1.266 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Mississippi State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Texas A&M)#56 (of 74 teams · 341.2 yds/g · 3,071 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 20.6 pts/g · 185 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 268.9 yds/g allowed · 2,420 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 13.9 pts/g allowed · 125 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · +6.7 /g · +60 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 15 taken, 9 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 30:55 /g · 4h 07m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 130 teams · 730.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 74 teams · 0.172 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.131 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.099 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Ohio State13–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #7 Michigan · postseason: #9 Washington)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #7 Michigan, #12 Penn State, #22 Northwestern · postseason: #9 Washington)#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 539.9 yds/g · 5,939 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 42.8 pts/g · 471 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 411.9 yds/g allowed · 4,531 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 304 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +15.2 /g · +167 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 20 taken, 15 given · +0.45 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 30:45 /g · 5h 38m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#96 (of 130 teams · 16% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 984.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.282 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 0.146 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 1.229 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.426 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Oklahoma12–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Texas, #16 West Virginia, #24 Iowa State)#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 600.7 yds/g · 6,007 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 51.3 pts/g · 513 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 468.9 yds/g allowed · 4,689 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 35.9 pts/g allowed · 359 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +15.4 /g · +154 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 7 taken, 10 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 30:24 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#106 (of 130 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 130 teams · 843.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.516 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.322 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 54% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.458 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 1.330 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Purdue6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ohio State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ohio State)#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 457.4 yds/g · 5,032 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 33.1 pts/g · 364 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 447.8 yds/g allowed · 4,926 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 307 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +5.2 /g · +57 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 12 taken, 15 given · -0.27 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 29:56 /g · 5h 29m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 130 teams · 520.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 74 teams · 0.233 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 0.197 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 1.368 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.142 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Miami7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#61 (of 74 teams · 336.1 yds/g · 3,025 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 214 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 290.1 yds/g allowed · 2,611 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 177 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +4.1 /g · +37 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 18 taken, 17 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 28:38 /g · 4h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#79 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 753.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 74 teams · 0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.032 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.403 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 1.258 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Washington10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Washington State, #17 Utah, #17 Utah)#35 (of 74 teams · 396.3 yds/g · 3,963 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 25.6 pts/g · 256 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 327.9 yds/g allowed · 3,279 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 188 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · +6.8 /g · +68 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 15 taken, 14 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 31:41 /g · 5h 17m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 130 teams · 772.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 74 teams · 0.205 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 1.234 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.135 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Washington State11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #17 Utah · postseason: #24 Iowa State)#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 448.8 yds/g · 4,039 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 36.6 pts/g · 329 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 381.0 yds/g allowed · 3,429 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 26.0 pts/g allowed · 234 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · +10.6 /g · +95 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 14 taken, 9 given · +0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 32:03 /g · 4h 48m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#123 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 130 teams · 554.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.286 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 0.183 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 1.263 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 1.340 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018California7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Washington)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Washington)#63 (of 74 teams · 330.0 yds/g · 3,300 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 20.7 pts/g · 207 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 321.5 yds/g allowed · 3,215 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 21.4 pts/g allowed · 214 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · -0.7 /g · -7 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 21 taken, 19 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 30:17 /g · 5h 03m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 130 teams · 596.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.027 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.139 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.163 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Kansas3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#50 (of 74 teams · 358.3 yds/g · 3,583 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 23.2 pts/g · 232 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 441.2 yds/g allowed · 4,412 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 32.7 pts/g allowed · 327 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · -9.5 /g · -95 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +10 in these games · 20 taken, 10 given · +1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 29:15 /g · 4h 52m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 130 teams · 517.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 74 teams · 0.122 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 0.233 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 1.371 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 1.237 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Kansas State5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#64 (of 74 teams · 327.9 yds/g · 3,279 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 20.2 pts/g · 202 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 420.7 yds/g allowed · 4,207 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · -6.2 /g · -62 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +7 in these games · 18 taken, 11 given · +0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 31:55 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 130 teams · 547.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 74 teams · 0.116 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 0.223 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 1.191 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.157 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Kentucky10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #10 Florida, #18 Mississippi State, #23 Missouri · postseason: #12 Penn State)#55 (of 74 teams · 344.9 yds/g · 3,104 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 202 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 330.9 yds/g allowed · 2,978 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 15.8 pts/g allowed · 142 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · +6.7 /g · +60 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 15 taken, 14 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 30:41 /g · 4h 36m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#119 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 130 teams · 670.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 74 teams · 0.115 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 0.125 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 1.178 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 1.300 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Maryland5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Texas)#45 (of 74 teams · 369.7 yds/g · 3,697 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 28.3 pts/g · 283 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 409.8 yds/g allowed · 4,098 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 295 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · -1.2 /g · -12 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +10 in these games · 21 taken, 11 given · +1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 29:07 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 130 teams · 725.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 74 teams · 0.193 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 0.142 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.579 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 1.202 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Pittsburgh7–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #20 Syracuse)#34 (of 74 teams · 397.1 yds/g · 3,971 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 289 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 390.7 yds/g allowed · 3,907 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 281 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · +0.8 /g · +8 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34:05 /g · 5h 41m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#95 (of 130 teams · 18% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 130 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 130 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 638.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 74 teams · 0.224 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 0.141 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.433 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 1.317 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Stanford9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#33 (of 74 teams · 399.3 yds/g · 3,993 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 29.4 pts/g · 294 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 441.5 yds/g allowed · 4,415 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 26.5 pts/g allowed · 265 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · +2.9 /g · +29 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · +3 in these games · 15 taken, 12 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 30:00 /g · 5h 00m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 130 teams · 786.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.247 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 0.216 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 1.317 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 1.264 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Syracuse10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #16 West Virginia)#15 (of 74 teams · 440.2 yds/g · 3,962 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35.7 pts/g · 321 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 424.2 yds/g allowed · 3,818 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 260 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +6.8 /g · +61 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +9 in these games · 22 taken, 13 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 30:56 /g · 4h 38m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 130 teams · 570.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 74 teams · 0.144 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 0.123 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 1.215 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 1.215 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Arizona5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#12 (of 74 teams · 445.4 yds/g · 4,009 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 273 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 419.8 yds/g allowed · 3,778 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 31.9 pts/g allowed · 287 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · -1.6 /g · -14 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · -2 in these games · 14 taken, 16 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 28:49 /g · 3h 51m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 580.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 74 teams · 0.200 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 0.166 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.383 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 1.339 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018LSU10–35 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia · postseason: #8 UCF)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #18 Mississippi State · postseason: #8 UCF)#40 (of 74 teams · 375.1 yds/g · 3,376 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 30.0 pts/g · 270 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 364.9 yds/g allowed · 3,284 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 24.4 pts/g allowed · 220 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · +5.6 /g · +50 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +9 in these games · 18 taken, 9 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 31:52 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#103 (of 130 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 10% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 889.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 74 teams · 0.101 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 37% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 1.249 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 1.190 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Michigan State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Penn State)#62 (of 74 teams · 331.9 yds/g · 3,319 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 16.8 pts/g · 168 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 315.1 yds/g allowed · 3,151 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 16.5 pts/g allowed · 165 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +0.3 /g · +3 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 19 taken, 18 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 31:25 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 130 teams · 658.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.033 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.007 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 1.190 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018NC State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#37 (of 74 teams · 381.0 yds/g · 3,048 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 33.4 pts/g · 267 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 427.6 yds/g allowed · 3,421 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 28.6 pts/g allowed · 229 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · +4.8 /g · +38 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 10 taken, 9 given · +0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33:27 /g · 3h 54m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 130 teams · 629.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 74 teams · 0.238 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 0.227 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.133 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 1.337 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Nebraska4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 464.2 yds/g · 4,642 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 29.6 pts/g · 296 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 459.5 yds/g allowed · 4,595 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 34.2 pts/g allowed · 342 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · -4.6 /g · -46 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · -2 in these games · 15 taken, 17 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 27:34 /g · 4h 36m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#126 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 130 teams · 711.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 74 teams · 0.221 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 0.199 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 1.226 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 1.288 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Oklahoma State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #15 Texas, #16 West Virginia, #25 Boise State · postseason: #23 Missouri)#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 468.6 yds/g · 4,217 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33.8 pts/g · 304 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 484.1 yds/g allowed · 4,357 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 37.6 pts/g allowed · 338 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · -3.8 /g · -34 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · -6 in these games · 8 taken, 14 given · -0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:12 /g · 4h 05m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#113 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#99 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 130 teams · 645.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.265 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 0.287 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 1.312 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 1.353 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Penn State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#32 (of 74 teams · 401.2 yds/g · 4,012 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 30.7 pts/g · 307 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 358.1 yds/g allowed · 3,581 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 192 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11.5 /g · +115 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 19 taken, 17 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:17 /g · 4h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 130 teams · 834.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 74 teams · 0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 1.239 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 1.198 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Texas10–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #4 Oklahoma · postseason: #5 Georgia)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #4 Oklahoma, #24 Iowa State · postseason: #5 Georgia)#30 (of 74 teams · 407.4 yds/g · 4,481 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 32.0 pts/g · 352 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 396.6 yds/g allowed · 4,362 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 281 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +6.5 /g · +71 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 14 taken, 8 given · +0.55 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 31:58 /g · 5h 52m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 861.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 74 teams · 0.221 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 0.160 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 1.179 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 1.281 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018USC5–74 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Washington State)#43 (of 74 teams · 371.8 yds/g · 4,090 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 24.6 pts/g · 270 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 386.2 yds/g allowed · 4,248 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 303 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · -3.0 /g · -33 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · -10 in these games · 9 taken, 19 given · -0.91 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 28:33 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#116 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 130 teams · 35% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 933.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 74 teams · 0.147 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 0.157 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 1.276 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 1.342 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Virginia8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#54 (of 74 teams · 350.4 yds/g · 3,154 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 23.3 pts/g · 210 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 345.1 yds/g allowed · 3,106 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 21.4 pts/g allowed · 193 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · +1.9 /g · +17 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · +0 in these games · 12 taken, 12 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33:09 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#120 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 542.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 74 teams · 0.148 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 0.132 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 1.168 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 1.341 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Wisconsin8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#22 (of 74 teams · 421.2 yds/g · 3,791 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 251 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 383.4 yds/g allowed · 3,451 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 250 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · +0.1 /g · +1 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · -4 in these games · 15 taken, 19 given · -0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 30:15 /g · 4h 32m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 130 teams · 653.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 74 teams · 0.229 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 0.150 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.100 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Arizona State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #17 Utah)#20 (of 74 teams · 424.3 yds/g · 4,243 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 29.9 pts/g · 299 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 416.1 yds/g allowed · 4,161 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 26.6 pts/g allowed · 266 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · +3.3 /g · +33 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 14 taken, 9 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 30:03 /g · 5h 00m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#118 (of 130 teams · 30% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 130 teams · 687.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 74 teams · 0.243 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 0.221 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 1.299 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 1.237 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Auburn8–55 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Washington)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Washington, #19 Texas A&M)#60 (of 74 teams · 338.2 yds/g · 3,044 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 22.1 pts/g · 199 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 417.6 yds/g allowed · 3,758 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 23.7 pts/g allowed · 213 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · -1.6 /g · -14 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 9 taken, 8 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 26:05 /g · 3h 55m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 130 teams · 827.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 74 teams · 0.113 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 0.163 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 1.186 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 1.316 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Baylor7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#24 (of 74 teams · 419.7 yds/g · 4,197 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 247 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 421.5 yds/g allowed · 4,215 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 32.7 pts/g allowed · 327 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -8.0 /g · -80 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -10 in these games · 6 taken, 16 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:27 /g · 5h 25m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#83 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 94% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 130 teams · 668.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 74 teams · 0.190 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 0.267 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 1.219 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.438 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Colorado5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#48 (of 74 teams · 362.5 yds/g · 3,625 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 23.5 pts/g · 235 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 400.9 yds/g allowed · 4,009 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 30.0 pts/g allowed · 300 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · -6.5 /g · -65 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -5 in these games · 10 taken, 15 given · -0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 31:09 /g · 5h 11m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 24% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#120 (of 130 teams · 29% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 130 teams · 575.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 74 teams · 0.072 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 0.174 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 36% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.435 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 1.270 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Florida10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #7 Michigan)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #11 LSU, #18 Mississippi State · postseason: #7 Michigan)#26 (of 74 teams · 414.8 yds/g · 3,733 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 27.8 pts/g · 250 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 367.2 yds/g allowed · 3,305 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 219 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · +3.4 /g · +31 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 16 taken, 12 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 31:08 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 130 teams · 831.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 74 teams · 0.212 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 0.167 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 1.179 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Florida State5–74 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#57 (of 74 teams · 341.2 yds/g · 3,412 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 19.0 pts/g · 190 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 424.9 yds/g allowed · 4,249 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 33.3 pts/g allowed · 333 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · -14.3 /g · -143 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -11 in these games · 10 taken, 21 given · -1.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 26:09 /g · 4h 22m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 888.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 74 teams · 0.076 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 0.131 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 31% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.513 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 1.300 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Georgia Tech7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 74 teams · 372.7 yds/g · 3,354 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 285 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 383.1 yds/g allowed · 3,448 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 31.2 pts/g allowed · 281 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · +0.4 /g · +4 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +8 in these games · 18 taken, 10 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34:38 /g · 5h 12m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 130 teams · 583.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 74 teams · 0.209 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 0.283 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 47% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.113 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 1.202 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Indiana5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#31 (of 74 teams · 405.5 yds/g · 4,055 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 241 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 441.5 yds/g allowed · 4,415 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 32.1 pts/g allowed · 321 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -8.0 /g · -80 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 21 taken, 19 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 28:02 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#84 (of 130 teams · 41% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 130 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 130 teams · 564.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 74 teams · 0.109 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 0.227 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 1.335 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Iowa State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 West Virginia)#47 (of 74 teams · 363.8 yds/g · 3,638 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 26.9 pts/g · 269 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 367.5 yds/g allowed · 3,675 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 233 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · +3.6 /g · +36 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 28:00 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 130 teams · 575.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 74 teams · 0.209 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 0.123 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 1.343 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 1.230 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018North Carolina2–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#18 (of 74 teams · 424.8 yds/g · 3,823 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 25.9 pts/g · 233 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 442.3 yds/g allowed · 3,981 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 34.8 pts/g allowed · 313 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · -8.9 /g · -80 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · -5 in these games · 15 taken, 20 given · -0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 28:07 /g · 4h 13m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 130 teams · 688.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 74 teams · 0.093 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 0.203 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 1.319 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 1.286 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Northwestern9–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #17 Utah)#59 (of 74 teams · 339.1 yds/g · 3,730 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 22.7 pts/g · 250 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 373.2 yds/g allowed · 4,105 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 221 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · +2.6 /g · +29 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 17 taken, 12 given · +0.45 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 30:22 /g · 5h 34m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 130 teams · 608.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 74 teams · 0.083 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 39% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 1.170 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Oregon9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Washington)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Washington)#17 (of 74 teams · 426.7 yds/g · 3,840 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 32.3 pts/g · 291 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 419.7 yds/g allowed · 3,777 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 264 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · +3.0 /g · +27 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 18 taken, 13 given · +0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 29:00 /g · 4h 21m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 130 teams · 695.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 74 teams · 0.210 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 0.184 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 1.299 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 1.229 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018TCU7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #24 Iowa State)#49 (of 74 teams · 360.2 yds/g · 3,602 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 19.9 pts/g · 199 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 370.6 yds/g allowed · 3,706 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 27.4 pts/g allowed · 274 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · -7.5 /g · -75 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · -8 in these games · 12 taken, 20 given · -0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 29:18 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#104 (of 130 teams · 8% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 130 teams · 53% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 130 teams · 671.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 74 teams · 0.066 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 0.163 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 1.218 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 1.310 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018UCLA3–91 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#28 (of 74 teams · 413.0 yds/g · 4,130 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 458.4 yds/g allowed · 4,584 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 34.5 pts/g allowed · 345 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · -8.1 /g · -81 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 27:42 /g · 4h 37m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#97 (of 130 teams · 15% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#99 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 754.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 74 teams · 0.203 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 0.259 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 1.268 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 1.283 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Utah9–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#27 (of 74 teams · 413.2 yds/g · 3,719 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 277 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 350.7 yds/g allowed · 3,156 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 20.9 pts/g allowed · 188 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · +9.9 /g · +89 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 30:41 /g · 4h 36m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#116 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 594.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 74 teams · 0.206 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 1.165 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.396 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Vanderbilt6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#39 (of 74 teams · 378.4 yds/g · 3,406 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 225 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 457.9 yds/g allowed · 4,121 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 28.6 pts/g allowed · 257 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · -3.6 /g · -32 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 15 taken, 9 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 31:18 /g · 4h 42m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 130 teams · 30% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 130 teams · 612.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 74 teams · 0.180 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 0.275 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 1.205 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 1.188 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Duke8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Northwestern)#44 (of 74 teams · 370.2 yds/g · 3,702 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 23.7 pts/g · 237 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 448.1 yds/g allowed · 4,481 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 30.2 pts/g allowed · 302 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · -6.5 /g · -65 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · -6 in these games · 9 taken, 15 given · -0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:00 /g · 4h 30m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 130 teams · 635.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 74 teams · 0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 0.181 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 1.279 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 1.335 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Minnesota7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Fresno State)#38 (of 74 teams · 380.3 yds/g · 3,423 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 247 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 440.3 yds/g allowed · 3,963 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 34.2 pts/g allowed · 308 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · -6.8 /g · -61 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · -7 in these games · 14 taken, 21 given · -0.78 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 31:11 /g · 4h 41m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 130 teams · 589.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 74 teams · 0.134 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 0.294 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 1.224 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 1.318 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Missouri8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)#19 (of 74 teams · 424.6 yds/g · 3,821 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 287 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 401.4 yds/g allowed · 3,613 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 233 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · +6.0 /g · +54 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 10 taken, 13 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 30:29 /g · 4h 34m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 130 teams · 595.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 74 teams · 0.190 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.088 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.388 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018South Carolina7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #23 Missouri)#25 (of 74 teams · 416.2 yds/g · 3,746 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 29.4 pts/g · 265 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 473.2 yds/g allowed · 4,259 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 33.2 pts/g allowed · 299 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · -3.8 /g · -34 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · -6 in these games · 9 taken, 15 given · -0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 24:44 /g · 3h 43m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 130 teams · 750.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 74 teams · 0.218 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 0.262 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 1.341 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.103 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Tennessee5–72 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Kentucky)#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 309.7 yds/g · 2,787 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 19.6 pts/g · 176 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 439.7 yds/g allowed · 3,957 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 36.6 pts/g allowed · 329 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · -17.0 /g · -153 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 11 taken, 14 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 28:47 /g · 4h 19m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 130 teams · 827.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 74 teams · 0.081 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 0.274 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.394 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Texas A&M9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 LSU, #14 Kentucky)#16 (of 74 teams · 428.4 yds/g · 3,856 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 268 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 362.2 yds/g allowed · 3,260 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 31.0 pts/g allowed · 279 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · -1.2 /g · -11 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -9 in these games · 5 taken, 14 given · -1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35:20 /g · 5h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 130 teams · 805.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 74 teams · 0.135 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 0.208 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.458 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Virginia Tech6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#36 (of 74 teams · 387.0 yds/g · 3,483 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 24.3 pts/g · 219 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 432.6 yds/g allowed · 3,893 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 31.3 pts/g allowed · 282 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · -7.0 /g · -63 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 30:05 /g · 4h 31m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 130 teams · 675.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 74 teams · 0.132 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 0.223 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 1.296 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.466 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Wake Forest7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#23 (of 74 teams · 421.1 yds/g · 3,790 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 260 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 485.3 yds/g allowed · 4,368 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 37.6 pts/g allowed · 338 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · -8.7 /g · -78 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · -2 in these games · 9 taken, 11 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 28:55 /g · 4h 20m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#99 (of 130 teams · 13% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 525.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 74 teams · 0.136 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 0.249 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 1.239 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 1.383 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Boston College7–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 74 teams · 357.1 yds/g · 3,214 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 222 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 419.8 yds/g allowed · 3,778 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 238 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · -1.8 /g · -16 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 26:55 /g · 4h 02m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 130 teams · 71% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 130 teams · 63% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 130 teams · 533.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 74 teams · 0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 0.115 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 1.359 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 1.248 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Texas Tech5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#14 (of 74 teams · 443.5 yds/g · 4,435 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 308 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 456.4 yds/g allowed · 4,564 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 32.4 pts/g allowed · 324 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · -1.6 /g · -16 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · -6 in these games · 14 taken, 20 given · -0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 29:25 /g · 4h 54m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#102 (of 130 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#129 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 21% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 130 teams · 561.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 74 teams · 0.158 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 0.224 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.128 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 1.264 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Ole Miss5–72 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#13 (of 74 teams · 445.0 yds/g · 4,005 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 223 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 483.8 yds/g allowed · 4,354 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 39.4 pts/g allowed · 355 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · -14.7 /g · -132 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · -5 in these games · 8 taken, 13 given · -0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 26:30 /g · 3h 59m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#85 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#100 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 130 teams · 734.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 74 teams · 0.185 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 0.251 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 1.263 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 1.218 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Arkansas2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 311.0 yds/g · 2,488 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 17.3 pts/g · 138 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 442.3 yds/g allowed · 3,538 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 39.9 pts/g allowed · 319 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -22.6 /g · -181 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -10 in these games · 6 taken, 16 given · -1.25 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 28:55 /g · 3h 51m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#82 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 89% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 694.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 74 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.301 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 34% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 1.372 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.169 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Louisville2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#51 (of 74 teams · 357.6 yds/g · 3,576 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 18.6 pts/g · 186 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 464.5 yds/g allowed · 4,645 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50.5 pts/g allowed · 505 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -31.9 /g · -319 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -10 in these games · 12 taken, 22 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 30:26 /g · 4h 34m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#105 (of 130 teams · 8% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 19% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 130 teams · 632.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 (of 74 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.399 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 55% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 1.335 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 1.224 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Oregon State2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#46 (of 74 teams · 366.9 yds/g · 3,669 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 23.0 pts/g · 230 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 559.4 yds/g allowed · 5,594 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 48.6 pts/g allowed · 486 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -25.6 /g · -256 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · -7 in these games · 7 taken, 14 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 30:04 /g · 5h 01m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#88 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 130 teams · 535.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 74 teams · 0.105 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.450 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 55% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 1.345 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 1.350 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Illinois4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#29 (of 74 teams · 410.4 yds/g · 3,694 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 228 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 517.2 yds/g allowed · 4,655 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 45.6 pts/g allowed · 410 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -20.2 /g · -182 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -9 in these games · 13 taken, 22 given · -1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 27:40 /g · 4h 09m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#124 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 562.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 74 teams · 0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.397 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 1.290 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 1.383 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Rutgers1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 248.8 yds/g · 2,488 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 11.4 pts/g · 114 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 418.4 yds/g allowed · 4,184 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 32.8 pts/g allowed · 328 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -21.4 /g · -214 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -15 in these games · 10 taken, 25 given · -1.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 27:53 /g · 4h 39m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 28% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 130 teams · 555.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -0.033 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 0.202 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 31% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 1.198 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 1.236 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Power 5, 20182018 UL MonroePower 5 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #33
Total offense. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Oklahoma #1 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 Alabama #4 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #5 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #6 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #7 of 74; 2018 Purdue #8 of 74; 2018 Georgia #9 of 74; 2018 Washington State #10 of 74; 2018 Arizona #12 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #13 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #14 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #15 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #16 of 74; 2018 Oregon #17 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #18 of 74; 2018 Missouri #19 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #20 of 74; 2018 Michigan #21 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #22 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #23 of 74; 2018 Baylor #24 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #25 of 74; 2018 Florida #26 of 74; 2018 Utah #27 of 74; 2018 UCLA #28 of 74; 2018 Illinois #29 of 74; 2018 Texas #30 of 74; 2018 Indiana #31 of 74; 2018 Penn State #32 of 74; 2018 Stanford #33 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #34 of 74; 2018 Washington #35 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #36 of 74; 2018 NC State #37 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #38 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #39 of 74; 2018 LSU #40 of 74; 2018 Iowa #41 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #42 of 74; 2018 USC #43 of 74; 2018 Duke #44 of 74; 2018 Maryland #45 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #46 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #47 of 74; 2018 Colorado #48 of 74; 2018 TCU #49 of 74; 2018 Kansas #50 of 74; 2018 Louisville #51 of 74; 2018 Boston College #52 of 74; 2018 Virginia #54 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #55 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #56 of 74; 2018 Florida State #57 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #59 of 74; 2018 Auburn #60 of 74; 2018 Miami #61 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #62 of 74; 2018 California #63 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #64 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #67 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #68 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 UL Monroe, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 33.
Scoring offensemedian #33
Scoring offense. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Oklahoma #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #4 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #5 of 74; 2018 Washington State #6 of 74; 2018 Georgia #7 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #7 of 74; 2018 Michigan #9 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #10 of 74; 2018 NC State #12 of 74; 2018 Purdue #13 of 74; 2018 Oregon #14 of 74; 2018 Texas #15 of 74; 2018 Missouri #16 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #17 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #18 of 74; 2018 Utah #19 of 74; 2018 Iowa #20 of 74; 2018 Penn State #20 of 74; 2018 Arizona #22 of 74; 2018 LSU #23 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #24 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #25 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #26 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #27 of 74; 2018 Stanford #28 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #29 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #30 of 74; 2018 Maryland #31 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #32 of 74; 2018 Florida #33 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #34 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #35 of 74; 2018 UCLA #36 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #37 of 74; 2018 Washington #38 of 74; 2018 Illinois #39 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #40 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #41 of 74; 2018 Baylor #42 of 74; 2018 Boston College #43 of 74; 2018 USC #44 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #45 of 74; 2018 Indiana #46 of 74; 2018 Miami #47 of 74; 2018 Duke #48 of 74; 2018 Colorado #49 of 74; 2018 Virginia #50 of 74; 2018 Kansas #51 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #52 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #53 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #54 of 74; 2018 Auburn #55 of 74; 2018 California #57 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #58 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #59 of 74; 2018 TCU #60 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #61 of 74; 2018 Florida State #62 of 74; 2018 Louisville #64 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #67 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #69 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 UL Monroe, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 33.
Total defensemedian #38
Total defense. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #1 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #2 of 74; 2018 Alabama #3 of 74; 2018 Miami #4 of 74; 2018 Iowa #5 of 74; 2018 Clemson #6 of 74; 2018 Georgia #7 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #8 of 74; 2018 California #9 of 74; 2018 Washington #10 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #12 of 74; 2018 Virginia #13 of 74; 2018 Utah #14 of 74; 2018 Penn State #15 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #16 of 74; 2018 LSU #17 of 74; 2018 Florida #18 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #19 of 74; 2018 TCU #20 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #21 of 74; 2018 Washington State #24 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #25 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #26 of 74; 2018 USC #28 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #29 of 74; 2018 Texas #31 of 74; 2018 Colorado #32 of 74; 2018 Missouri #33 of 74; 2018 Maryland #34 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #35 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #37 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #38 of 74; 2018 Auburn #39 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #40 of 74; 2018 Oregon #41 of 74; 2018 Arizona #42 of 74; 2018 Boston College #42 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #44 of 74; 2018 Baylor #45 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #46 of 74; 2018 Florida State #47 of 74; 2018 NC State #48 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #49 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #50 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #51 of 74; 2018 Kansas #52 of 74; 2018 Indiana #53 of 74; 2018 Stanford #53 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #55 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #56 of 74; 2018 Purdue #57 of 74; 2018 Duke #58 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #59 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #60 of 74; 2018 UCLA #62 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #63 of 74; 2018 Louisville #64 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #65 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #66 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #68 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #69 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #70 of 74; 2018 Illinois #71 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 UL Monroe, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 38.
Scoring defensemedian #34
Scoring defense. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Mississippi State #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #4 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #5 of 74; 2018 Iowa #7 of 74; 2018 Michigan #7 of 74; 2018 Washington #7 of 74; 2018 Georgia #10 of 74; 2018 Penn State #11 of 74; 2018 Miami #12 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #13 of 74; 2018 Utah #14 of 74; 2018 California #15 of 74; 2018 Virginia #16 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #17 of 74; 2018 Auburn #18 of 74; 2018 Florida #19 of 74; 2018 LSU #20 of 74; 2018 Texas #21 of 74; 2018 Missouri #22 of 74; 2018 Washington State #23 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #24 of 74; 2018 Boston College #25 of 74; 2018 Stanford #26 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #27 of 74; 2018 TCU #29 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #30 of 74; 2018 USC #31 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #32 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #33 of 74; 2018 Purdue #34 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #35 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #36 of 74; 2018 NC State #37 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #38 of 74; 2018 Oregon #40 of 74; 2018 Maryland #42 of 74; 2018 Colorado #43 of 74; 2018 Duke #44 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #45 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #46 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #47 of 74; 2018 Arizona #48 of 74; 2018 Indiana #49 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #51 of 74; 2018 Baylor #52 of 74; 2018 Kansas #52 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #54 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #55 of 74; 2018 Florida State #56 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #57 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #58 of 74; 2018 UCLA #59 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #60 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #61 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #62 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #63 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #63 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #66 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #67 of 74; 2018 Illinois #71 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #72 of 74; 2018 Louisville #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 UL Monroe, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 34.
Point marginmedian #33
Point margin. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Alabama #1 of 74; 2018 Clemson #2 of 74; 2018 Georgia #4 of 74; 2018 Michigan #5 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #6 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #7 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #8 of 74; 2018 Iowa #9 of 74; 2018 Penn State #10 of 74; 2018 Washington State #11 of 74; 2018 Utah #12 of 74; 2018 Washington #13 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #14 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #15 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #15 of 74; 2018 Texas #17 of 74; 2018 Missouri #18 of 74; 2018 LSU #19 of 74; 2018 Purdue #20 of 74; 2018 NC State #21 of 74; 2018 Miami #22 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #23 of 74; 2018 Florida #24 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #25 of 74; 2018 Oregon #26 of 74; 2018 Stanford #27 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #28 of 74; 2018 Virginia #29 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #30 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #31 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #32 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #33 of 74; 2018 California #34 of 74; 2018 Maryland #35 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #36 of 74; 2018 Arizona #37 of 74; 2018 Auburn #37 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #39 of 74; 2018 Boston College #40 of 74; 2018 USC #41 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #42 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #43 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #43 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #45 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #46 of 74; 2018 Colorado #48 of 74; 2018 Duke #48 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #50 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #51 of 74; 2018 TCU #52 of 74; 2018 Baylor #53 of 74; 2018 Indiana #53 of 74; 2018 UCLA #55 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #56 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #57 of 74; 2018 Kansas #58 of 74; 2018 Florida State #60 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #61 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #63 of 74; 2018 Illinois #65 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #67 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #68 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #69 of 74; 2018 Louisville #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 UL Monroe, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 33.
Turnover marginmedian #32
Turnover margin. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Kansas #2 of 74; 2018 LSU #2 of 74; 2018 Maryland #2 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #2 of 74; 2018 Alabama #7 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #7 of 74; 2018 Iowa #9 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #10 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #11 of 74; 2018 Utah #11 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #11 of 74; 2018 Michigan #14 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #14 of 74; 2018 Oregon #17 of 74; 2018 Washington State #17 of 74; 2018 Texas #19 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #20 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #20 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #22 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #22 of 74; 2018 Florida #24 of 74; 2018 Stanford #26 of 74; 2018 Boston College #27 of 74; 2018 California #28 of 74; 2018 Indiana #28 of 74; 2018 Penn State #28 of 74; 2018 NC State #31 of 74; 2018 Auburn #32 of 74; 2018 Georgia #32 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #32 of 74; 2018 Miami #32 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #32 of 74; 2018 Clemson #37 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #37 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #37 of 74; 2018 UCLA #37 of 74; 2018 Washington #37 of 74; 2018 Virginia #42 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #43 of 74; 2018 Arizona #44 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #44 of 74; 2018 Purdue #46 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #47 of 74; 2018 Missouri #48 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #48 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #52 of 74; 2018 Colorado #53 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #54 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #54 of 74; 2018 Duke #56 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #56 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #58 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #58 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #61 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #62 of 74; 2018 TCU #63 of 74; 2018 USC #64 of 74; 2018 Baylor #65 of 74; 2018 Illinois #65 of 74; 2018 Louisville #65 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #65 of 74; 2018 Florida State #71 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #72 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 UL Monroe, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 32.
Possessionmedian #38
Possession. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #1 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #2 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #3 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #4 of 74; 2018 NC State #5 of 74; 2018 Virginia #7 of 74; 2018 Iowa #9 of 74; 2018 Baylor #10 of 74; 2018 Georgia #11 of 74; 2018 Washington State #13 of 74; 2018 Texas #14 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #15 of 74; 2018 LSU #16 of 74; 2018 Washington #17 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #18 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #19 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #20 of 74; 2018 Colorado #21 of 74; 2018 Florida #22 of 74; 2018 Alabama #23 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #26 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #27 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #28 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #29 of 74; 2018 Utah #29 of 74; 2018 Missouri #32 of 74; 2018 Louisville #33 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #34 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #35 of 74; 2018 California #36 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #37 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #38 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #39 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #40 of 74; 2018 Stanford #41 of 74; 2018 Purdue #42 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #44 of 74; 2018 TCU #45 of 74; 2018 Kansas #47 of 74; 2018 Maryland #48 of 74; 2018 Clemson #49 of 74; 2018 Oregon #50 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #51 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #52 of 74; 2018 Arizona #53 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #54 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #55 of 74; 2018 Miami #56 of 74; 2018 USC #57 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #58 of 74; 2018 Indiana #59 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #60 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #61 of 74; 2018 UCLA #62 of 74; 2018 Illinois #63 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #64 of 74; 2018 Penn State #65 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #66 of 74; 2018 Duke #67 of 74; 2018 Boston College #68 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #70 of 74; 2018 Florida State #71 of 74; 2018 Auburn #72 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #74 of 74. Marked: 2018 UL Monroe, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 38.
Returning passingmedian #55
Returning passing. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 California #1 of 130; 2018 Kansas #1 of 130; 2018 Missouri #1 of 130; 2018 Purdue #1 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #1 of 130; 2018 Texas #14 of 130; 2018 Auburn #15 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #15 of 130; 2018 Duke #17 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #18 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #18 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #20 of 130; 2018 Colorado #21 of 130; 2018 Iowa #21 of 130; 2018 NC State #24 of 130; 2018 Alabama #26 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #27 of 130; 2018 Penn State #27 of 130; 2018 Georgia Tech #29 of 130; 2018 Miami #33 of 130; 2018 Washington #35 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #36 of 130; 2018 Virginia Tech #37 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #38 of 130; 2018 Florida State #40 of 130; 2018 Georgia #42 of 130; 2018 Oregon #46 of 130; 2018 Clemson #49 of 130; 2018 Maryland #50 of 130; 2018 Syracuse #52 of 130; 2018 North Carolina #53 of 130; 2018 West Virginia #55 of 130; 2018 Utah #58 of 130; 2018 Florida #60 of 130; 2018 Boston College #61 of 130; 2018 Iowa State #66 of 130; 2018 Kansas State #67 of 130; 2018 Arizona #68 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #70 of 130; 2018 Stanford #72 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #75 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #82 of 130; 2018 Baylor #83 of 130; 2018 Indiana #84 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #85 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #88 of 130; 2018 Michigan #92 of 130; 2018 Pittsburgh #95 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #96 of 130; 2018 UCLA #97 of 130; 2018 Wake Forest #99 of 130; 2018 Texas Tech #102 of 130; 2018 LSU #103 of 130; 2018 TCU #104 of 130; 2018 Louisville #105 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma #106 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma State #113 of 130; 2018 USC #116 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #119 of 130; 2018 Virginia #120 of 130; 2018 Washington State #123 of 130; 2018 Illinois #124 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #126 of 130; 2018 Minnesota #127 of 130. Marked: 2018 UL Monroe, ranked 51 of 130. Power 5 median rank 55.
Returning receivingmedian #66
Returning receiving. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Baylor #4 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #8 of 130; 2018 Auburn #10 of 130; 2018 Stanford #11 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #12 of 130; 2018 Duke #16 of 130; 2018 Arizona #18 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #19 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #20 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #20 of 130; 2018 Boston College #22 of 130; 2018 California #30 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #32 of 130; 2018 Minnesota #34 of 130; 2018 Kansas #35 of 130; 2018 North Carolina #36 of 130; 2018 Purdue #38 of 130; 2018 Michigan #40 of 130; 2018 Oregon #40 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #43 of 130; 2018 Washington State #45 of 130; 2018 Louisville #46 of 130; 2018 NC State #47 of 130; 2018 Illinois #48 of 130; 2018 Georgia #50 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #51 of 130; 2018 Iowa #54 of 130; 2018 Florida State #57 of 130; 2018 West Virginia #59 of 130; 2018 Texas #63 of 130; 2018 Florida #65 of 130; 2018 Kansas State #66 of 130; 2018 Wake Forest #67 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #68 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #69 of 130; 2018 Clemson #70 of 130; 2018 Virginia Tech #70 of 130; 2018 Virginia #72 of 130; 2018 Missouri #74 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #75 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma #77 of 130; 2018 Washington #77 of 130; 2018 Miami #79 of 130; 2018 Indiana #81 of 130; 2018 Pittsburgh #82 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #84 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #91 of 130; 2018 TCU #94 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #94 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #96 of 130; 2018 Maryland #98 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma State #99 of 130; 2018 UCLA #99 of 130; 2018 USC #101 of 130; 2018 Iowa State #105 of 130; 2018 Alabama #108 of 130; 2018 Georgia Tech #110 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #111 of 130; 2018 Penn State #112 of 130; 2018 Syracuse #114 of 130; 2018 LSU #115 of 130; 2018 Utah #116 of 130; 2018 Colorado #127 of 130; 2018 Texas Tech #129 of 130. Marked: 2018 UL Monroe, ranked 27 of 130. Power 5 median rank 66.
Returning rushingmedian #64
Returning rushing. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Mississippi State #1 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #5 of 130; 2018 Florida State #8 of 130; 2018 Stanford #9 of 130; 2018 Purdue #10 of 130; 2018 Maryland #11 of 130; 2018 Syracuse #14 of 130; 2018 North Carolina #15 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #19 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #20 of 130; 2018 Georgia Tech #21 of 130; 2018 Iowa State #24 of 130; 2018 Utah #24 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma State #26 of 130; 2018 Clemson #27 of 130; 2018 Miami #30 of 130; 2018 Kansas State #31 of 130; 2018 Virginia #33 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #34 of 130; 2018 Texas #35 of 130; 2018 Florida #38 of 130; 2018 Washington #39 of 130; 2018 Alabama #42 of 130; 2018 UCLA #43 of 130; 2018 Virginia Tech #45 of 130; 2018 Kansas #47 of 130; 2018 Baylor #50 of 130; 2018 Wake Forest #55 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma #60 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #61 of 130; 2018 Duke #62 of 130; 2018 Michigan #64 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #66 of 130; 2018 Minnesota #68 of 130; 2018 California #70 of 130; 2018 Pittsburgh #71 of 130; 2018 Boston College #72 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #74 of 130; 2018 Missouri #77 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #78 of 130; 2018 Arizona #80 of 130; 2018 West Virginia #82 of 130; 2018 TCU #83 of 130; 2018 Indiana #84 of 130; 2018 Illinois #85 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #94 of 130; 2018 Penn State #98 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #100 of 130; 2018 Texas Tech #103 of 130; 2018 Auburn #106 of 130; 2018 Oregon #106 of 130; 2018 Georgia #108 of 130; 2018 Washington State #109 of 130; 2018 NC State #110 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #112 of 130; 2018 USC #114 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #118 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #119 of 130; 2018 Colorado #120 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #121 of 130; 2018 Iowa #124 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #125 of 130; 2018 Louisville #126 of 130; 2018 LSU #127 of 130. Marked: 2018 UL Monroe, ranked 37 of 130. Power 5 median rank 64.
Team talentmedian #33
Team talent. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #1 of 130; 2018 Alabama #2 of 130; 2018 Georgia #3 of 130; 2018 USC #4 of 130; 2018 Clemson #5 of 130; 2018 LSU #6 of 130; 2018 Florida State #7 of 130; 2018 Michigan #8 of 130; 2018 Texas #9 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma #11 of 130; 2018 Penn State #12 of 130; 2018 Florida #13 of 130; 2018 Auburn #14 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #15 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #16 of 130; 2018 Stanford #17 of 130; 2018 Washington #18 of 130; 2018 UCLA #19 of 130; 2018 Miami #20 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #21 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #22 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #23 of 130; 2018 Maryland #24 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #25 of 130; 2018 Oregon #26 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #27 of 130; 2018 North Carolina #28 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #29 of 130; 2018 Virginia Tech #30 of 130; 2018 TCU #31 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #32 of 130; 2018 Baylor #33 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #34 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #35 of 130; 2018 West Virginia #36 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma State #37 of 130; 2018 Pittsburgh #38 of 130; 2018 Duke #39 of 130; 2018 Louisville #40 of 130; 2018 NC State #41 of 130; 2018 Iowa #42 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #43 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #44 of 130; 2018 California #45 of 130; 2018 Missouri #46 of 130; 2018 Utah #47 of 130; 2018 Minnesota #48 of 130; 2018 Georgia Tech #49 of 130; 2018 Arizona #50 of 130; 2018 Iowa State #52 of 130; 2018 Colorado #53 of 130; 2018 Syracuse #54 of 130; 2018 Indiana #57 of 130; 2018 Illinois #58 of 130; 2018 Texas Tech #59 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #60 of 130; 2018 Washington State #61 of 130; 2018 Kansas State #63 of 130; 2018 Virginia #66 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #68 of 130; 2018 Boston College #69 of 130; 2018 Wake Forest #70 of 130; 2018 Purdue #71 of 130; 2018 Kansas #72 of 130. Marked: 2018 UL Monroe, ranked 122 of 130. Power 5 median rank 33.
Offensive EPAmedian #33
Offensive EPA. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Oklahoma #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #4 of 74; 2018 Georgia #5 of 74; 2018 Washington State #6 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #7 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #8 of 74; 2018 Stanford #9 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #11 of 74; 2018 NC State #12 of 74; 2018 Purdue #13 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #14 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #15 of 74; 2018 Texas #16 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #17 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #18 of 74; 2018 Michigan #19 of 74; 2018 Florida #20 of 74; 2018 Oregon #21 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #22 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #23 of 74; 2018 Utah #24 of 74; 2018 Washington #25 of 74; 2018 UCLA #26 of 74; 2018 Arizona #27 of 74; 2018 Maryland #28 of 74; 2018 Missouri #29 of 74; 2018 Baylor #30 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #31 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #32 of 74; 2018 Illinois #33 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #34 of 74; 2018 Iowa #35 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #36 of 74; 2018 Penn State #37 of 74; 2018 Virginia #38 of 74; 2018 USC #39 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #40 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #41 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #42 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #43 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #44 of 74; 2018 Kansas #45 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #46 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #47 of 74; 2018 Auburn #48 of 74; 2018 Indiana #49 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #51 of 74; 2018 LSU #52 of 74; 2018 Duke #53 of 74; 2018 Miami #54 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #55 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #56 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #57 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #58 of 74; 2018 Florida State #59 of 74; 2018 Colorado #61 of 74; 2018 TCU #62 of 74; 2018 Louisville #63 of 74; 2018 Boston College #64 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #66 of 74; 2018 California #67 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 UL Monroe, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 33.
Defensive EPAmedian #36
Defensive EPA. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Mississippi State #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Miami #4 of 74; 2018 Clemson #5 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #6 of 74; 2018 Michigan #7 of 74; 2018 California #8 of 74; 2018 Iowa #10 of 74; 2018 Penn State #11 of 74; 2018 Georgia #12 of 74; 2018 Washington #13 of 74; 2018 LSU #14 of 74; 2018 Utah #15 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #16 of 74; 2018 Boston College #18 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #19 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #20 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #21 of 74; 2018 Missouri #23 of 74; 2018 Florida State #24 of 74; 2018 Virginia #25 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #26 of 74; 2018 Maryland #27 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #28 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #29 of 74; 2018 USC #30 of 74; 2018 Texas #31 of 74; 2018 TCU #32 of 74; 2018 Auburn #33 of 74; 2018 Arizona #34 of 74; 2018 Florida #35 of 74; 2018 Colorado #36 of 74; 2018 Duke #37 of 74; 2018 Washington State #38 of 74; 2018 Oregon #39 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #40 of 74; 2018 Purdue #41 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #42 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #43 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #44 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #45 of 74; 2018 Stanford #46 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #47 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #48 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #49 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #51 of 74; 2018 Indiana #52 of 74; 2018 NC State #53 of 74; 2018 Kansas #54 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #55 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #56 of 74; 2018 UCLA #57 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #58 of 74; 2018 Baylor #59 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #60 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #61 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #62 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #63 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #64 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #65 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #67 of 74; 2018 Illinois #70 of 74; 2018 Louisville #71 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 UL Monroe, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 36.
Offensive success ratemedian #33
Offensive success rate. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Oklahoma #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Georgia #3 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #4 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #5 of 74; 2018 NC State #6 of 74; 2018 Clemson #7 of 74; 2018 Washington State #8 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #9 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #10 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #11 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #12 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #13 of 74; 2018 Michigan #14 of 74; 2018 Missouri #15 of 74; 2018 Washington #16 of 74; 2018 Florida #17 of 74; 2018 Stanford #18 of 74; 2018 Utah #19 of 74; 2018 Texas #20 of 74; 2018 Baylor #21 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #22 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #24 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #25 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #26 of 74; 2018 UCLA #27 of 74; 2018 Purdue #28 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #29 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #30 of 74; 2018 Penn State #31 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #32 of 74; 2018 Oregon #33 of 74; 2018 Illinois #34 of 74; 2018 USC #35 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #36 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #37 of 74; 2018 Virginia #38 of 74; 2018 Indiana #39 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #41 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #42 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #43 of 74; 2018 Auburn #45 of 74; 2018 Iowa #46 of 74; 2018 Arizona #47 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #48 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #49 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #50 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #51 of 74; 2018 Duke #52 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #53 of 74; 2018 California #54 of 74; 2018 TCU #55 of 74; 2018 Louisville #56 of 74; 2018 Kansas #58 of 74; 2018 LSU #60 of 74; 2018 Maryland #61 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #63 of 74; 2018 Colorado #64 of 74; 2018 Miami #65 of 74; 2018 Boston College #66 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #67 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #68 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #71 of 74; 2018 Florida State #73 of 74. Marked: 2018 UL Monroe, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 33.
Defensive success ratemedian #36
Defensive success rate. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Alabama #1 of 74; 2018 Clemson #2 of 74; 2018 Michigan #3 of 74; 2018 Miami #4 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #5 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #6 of 74; 2018 Utah #7 of 74; 2018 Penn State #9 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #10 of 74; 2018 Missouri #11 of 74; 2018 Virginia #12 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #13 of 74; 2018 California #14 of 74; 2018 USC #16 of 74; 2018 Washington #17 of 74; 2018 Florida State #18 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #19 of 74; 2018 TCU #20 of 74; 2018 Florida #22 of 74; 2018 LSU #23 of 74; 2018 Boston College #24 of 74; 2018 Auburn #25 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #26 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #27 of 74; 2018 Arizona #28 of 74; 2018 Iowa #29 of 74; 2018 Duke #30 of 74; 2018 Washington State #31 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #32 of 74; 2018 Colorado #33 of 74; 2018 Georgia #35 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #36 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #37 of 74; 2018 Baylor #38 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #39 of 74; 2018 NC State #40 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #41 of 74; 2018 Indiana #42 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #43 of 74; 2018 Texas #44 of 74; 2018 Maryland #45 of 74; 2018 Oregon #46 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #47 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #48 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #49 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #50 of 74; 2018 Stanford #51 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #52 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #53 of 74; 2018 Purdue #54 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #56 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #57 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #58 of 74; 2018 UCLA #59 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #60 of 74; 2018 Kansas #62 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #64 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #66 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #67 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #68 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #69 of 74; 2018 Illinois #70 of 74; 2018 Louisville #73 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #74 of 74. Marked: 2018 UL Monroe, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 36.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #34
Offensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Maryland #1 of 74; 2018 Florida State #2 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #4 of 74; 2018 Colorado #5 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #6 of 74; 2018 Miami #7 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #8 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #9 of 74; 2018 Arizona #10 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #11 of 74; 2018 Kansas #12 of 74; 2018 Purdue #13 of 74; 2018 Boston College #14 of 74; 2018 Clemson #15 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #16 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #17 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #18 of 74; 2018 Louisville #20 of 74; 2018 Alabama #21 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #22 of 74; 2018 Stanford #23 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #24 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #25 of 74; 2018 Oregon #26 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #27 of 74; 2018 Illinois #28 of 74; 2018 Duke #29 of 74; 2018 Iowa #30 of 74; 2018 USC #31 of 74; 2018 UCLA #32 of 74; 2018 Washington State #33 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #34 of 74; 2018 LSU #35 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #36 of 74; 2018 Penn State #37 of 74; 2018 Washington #38 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #39 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #40 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #42 of 74; 2018 Baylor #44 of 74; 2018 TCU #45 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #46 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #47 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #48 of 74; 2018 Indiana #49 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #50 of 74; 2018 Georgia #51 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #52 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #54 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #55 of 74; 2018 Auburn #57 of 74; 2018 Texas #58 of 74; 2018 Florida #59 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #60 of 74; 2018 Michigan #62 of 74; 2018 Virginia #63 of 74; 2018 Utah #64 of 74; 2018 California #65 of 74; 2018 NC State #66 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #68 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #69 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #70 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #72 of 74; 2018 Missouri #74 of 74. Marked: 2018 UL Monroe, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 34.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #36
Defensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Georgia #1 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #2 of 74; 2018 South Carolina #3 of 74; 2018 Iowa #4 of 74; 2018 Washington #6 of 74; 2018 Purdue #7 of 74; 2018 Kansas State #8 of 74; 2018 California #9 of 74; 2018 Arkansas #10 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #11 of 74; 2018 Vanderbilt #13 of 74; 2018 Wisconsin #14 of 74; 2018 Tennessee #15 of 74; 2018 Michigan State #16 of 74; 2018 LSU #17 of 74; 2018 Penn State #18 of 74; 2018 Georgia Tech #19 of 74; 2018 Maryland #20 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #21 of 74; 2018 Ole Miss #22 of 74; 2018 Louisville #23 of 74; 2018 Oregon #24 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #25 of 74; 2018 Rutgers #27 of 74; 2018 Arizona State #28 of 74; 2018 Kansas #29 of 74; 2018 Florida #30 of 74; 2018 Boston College #32 of 74; 2018 Miami #33 of 74; 2018 Texas Tech #34 of 74; 2018 Stanford #35 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #36 of 74; 2018 Colorado #37 of 74; 2018 Texas #38 of 74; 2018 Clemson #40 of 74; 2018 UCLA #41 of 74; 2018 North Carolina #42 of 74; 2018 Nebraska #43 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #45 of 74; 2018 Florida State #46 of 74; 2018 TCU #47 of 74; 2018 Auburn #48 of 74; 2018 Pittsburgh #49 of 74; 2018 Minnesota #50 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #51 of 74; 2018 Indiana #52 of 74; 2018 Duke #53 of 74; 2018 NC State #54 of 74; 2018 Arizona #55 of 74; 2018 Washington State #56 of 74; 2018 Virginia #57 of 74; 2018 USC #58 of 74; 2018 Alabama #59 of 74; 2018 Oregon State #60 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma State #62 of 74; 2018 Illinois #63 of 74; 2018 Wake Forest #64 of 74; 2018 Missouri #65 of 74; 2018 Utah #66 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #69 of 74; 2018 Baylor #70 of 74; 2018 Michigan #71 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #72 of 74; 2018 Virginia Tech #74 of 74. Marked: 2018 UL Monroe, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 36.